DWB 2.0

Developer: JLL

Category: Business

125 installs

ratings

+2 weekly installs

trend steady

+4 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 77 keywords for DWB 2.0 in Google Play

Developer: JLL Category: business

DWB 2.0 tracks 77 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 77 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 48.7.

eFit QA Inspections are used to audit the facilities.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 77 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.8

Top keyword: task

Avg difficulty

48.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

task

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 61.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,156
67.6
mobile phone

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 983
68.3
effective

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,180
71.0
area

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,388
70.8
case

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,094
70.1

Unranked opportunities

task

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 61.2 • Competitors: 1,156
mobile phone

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.3 • Competitors: 983
effective

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 1,180
area

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.1 • Competitors: 1,388
case

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Competitors: 1,094

High competition keywords

using

Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
different

Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
way

Total apps: 89,339 • Major competitors: 10,854

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.0
allows

Total apps: 77,278 • Major competitors: 7,086

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
offline	68	100	60	81 54,787 competing apps Median installs: 36,532 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,486 major competitor apps
level	68	100	60	80 47,860 competing apps Median installs: 42,032 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	6,533 major competitor apps
phone	67	100	69	83 75,756 competing apps Median installs: 37,780 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	9,010 major competitor apps
date	69	100	60	77 31,688 competing apps Median installs: 26,732 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,809 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
way	66	100	61	85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	10,854 major competitor apps
using	65	100	64	86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	13,323 major competitor apps
connectivity	71	100	47	59 2,723 competing apps Median installs: 27,936 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	255 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
various	67	100	58	83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	9,464 major competitor apps
task	73	100	61	68 9,006 competing apps Median installs: 39,110 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,156 major competitor apps
services	69	100	64	78 38,598 competing apps Median installs: 28,828 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	4,045 major competitor apps
audit	69	100	30	48 604 competing apps Median installs: 17,652 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	27 major competitor apps
monitor	71	100	48	73 19,087 competing apps Median installs: 23,470 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,617 major competitor apps
code	71	100	53	73 19,267 competing apps Median installs: 32,705 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	2,141 major competitor apps
effective	72	100	46	71 14,246 competing apps Median installs: 26,024 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,180 major competitor apps
efficient	71	100	54	72 16,594 competing apps Median installs: 15,694 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,185 major competitor apps
track	67	100	57	81 58,055 competing apps Median installs: 25,840 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,673 major competitor apps
text	69	100	65	79 40,134 competing apps Median installs: 37,748 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,404 major competitor apps
area	72	100	54	71 13,871 competing apps Median installs: 28,178 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,388 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	53	78 38,943 competing apps Median installs: 28,037 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,793 major competitor apps
meet	70	100	65	75 24,878 competing apps Median installs: 46,672 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,573 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	58	84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	7,086 major competitor apps
case	72	100	46	70 12,727 competing apps Median installs: 25,350 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,094 major competitor apps
facility	71	100	40	60 3,454 competing apps Median installs: 20,831 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	244 major competitor apps

App Description

eFit QA Inspections are used to audit the facilities.

To deliver our services in an efficient way and to meet SLAs, we use various checklists for tasks and inspection of different areas and assets at client facilities.

To ensure that the checks & tasks on these lists are carried out in an effective way, we have developed the eFit Facility Inspection tool, which is a web-based application that helps to ensure 100% completion of tasks and inspections. The tool also generates a report on non-compliance to scheduled tasks and inspection observations.

This tool can be used at task level or supervision level and makes use of tablet/mobile phone using Android apps. As soon as the bar code in the area or on the asset to be checked is scanned using the application, the checklist for that particular area or asset pops up. The status of various parameters in the checklist can then be entered or updated.on the tablet. The Android app also allows for offline input, date for which can be uploaded whenever connectivity is restored. In case of non-compliance, this tool has a capability of sending an e-mail or text message alert to a pre-assigned JLL Manager/client Manager. This helps the manager to track and monitor the completion of tasks.