miniMAGIC

Developer: Griffith University

Category: Medical

1.5K installs

ratings

+2 weekly installs

trend steady

+48 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 37 keywords for miniMAGIC in Google Play

Developer: Griffith University Category: medical

miniMAGIC tracks 37 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 37 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.2, difficulty 45.3.

Safe IV selection

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 37 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.2

Top keyword: saving

Avg difficulty

45.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

saving

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,633
70.4
decision

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 470
62.3
guidance

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 600
66.6
highly

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,489
69.0
totally

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,133
66.3

Unranked opportunities

saving

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Competitors: 1,633
decision

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 470
guidance

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 600
highly

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 1,489
totally

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 1,133

High competition keywords

access

Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
provides

Total apps: 71,787 • Major competitors: 6,088

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
based

Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
receive

Total apps: 56,666 • Major competitors: 5,489

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
device

Total apps: 52,389 • Major competitors: 6,390

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 72.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
device	68	100	72	81 52,389 competing apps Median installs: 37,519 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	6,390 major competitor apps
range	69	100	53	78 37,225 competing apps Median installs: 32,979 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	4,354 major competitor apps
michigan	67	100	26	39 190 competing apps Median installs: 19,018 Avg rating: 3.8	—	—	9 major competitor apps
access	65	100	67	87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	11,667 major competitor apps
patients	71	100	39	60 3,336 competing apps Median installs: 19,052 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	203 major competitor apps
technique	70	100	35	55 1,653 competing apps Median installs: 32,169 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	145 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	60	83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,088 major competitor apps
devices	70	100	67	75 25,598 competing apps Median installs: 36,807 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	3,146 major competitor apps
guide	70	100	49	76 27,742 competing apps Median installs: 22,659 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	2,061 major competitor apps
receive	68	100	57	81 56,666 competing apps Median installs: 28,494 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,489 major competitor apps
across	69	100	81	78 38,391 competing apps Median installs: 39,224 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	5,234 major competitor apps
saving	72	100	52	70 13,263 competing apps Median installs: 38,092 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,633 major competitor apps
safe	70	100	65	76 27,975 competing apps Median installs: 36,001 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	3,609 major competitor apps
decision	72	100	42	62 4,410 competing apps Median installs: 35,836 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	470 major competitor apps
based	67	100	63	82 67,175 competing apps Median installs: 30,073 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,592 major competitor apps
children	71	100	49	72 15,339 competing apps Median installs: 40,066 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,968 major competitor apps
placement	70	100	36	55 1,594 competing apps Median installs: 28,970 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	135 major competitor apps
blood	71	100	44	62 4,267 competing apps Median installs: 37,430 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	450 major competitor apps
selection	71	100	53	73 19,807 competing apps Median installs: 34,067 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,378 major competitor apps
making	68	100	56	81 52,261 competing apps Median installs: 35,859 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,194 major competitor apps
guidance	72	100	43	67 7,888 competing apps Median installs: 24,858 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	600 major competitor apps
highly	72	100	50	69 10,931 competing apps Median installs: 44,837 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,489 major competitor apps
clinical	71	100	36	58 2,562 competing apps Median installs: 15,804 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	74 major competitor apps
totally	72	100	48	66 7,570 competing apps Median installs: 50,634 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,133 major competitor apps
iv	68	100	27	43 307 competing apps Median installs: 28,508 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	19 major competitor apps

App Description

Safe IV selection

The majority of all hospitalized children require placement of a vascular access device to receive medications, for life-saving therapies and blood tests. But vascular access decision making in pediatric patients remains a complex, highly variable process.

The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravascular Catheters in Pediatrics (miniMAGIC) provides evidence-based guidance on intravenous catheter selection, device characteristics and insertion technique – from umbilical catheters to totally implanted venous devices – in pediatric patients, across a range of clinical indications.