miniMAGIC

Developer: Griffith University

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

1.5K installs

ratings

+3.00 weekly installs

trend steady

+14 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 37 keywords for miniMAGIC in Google Play

Developer: Griffith University Category: medical

miniMAGIC tracks 37 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 37 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 41.9.

Safe IV selection

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 37 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.5

Top keyword: patients

Avg difficulty

41.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

patients

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 198
63.6
decision

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 560
64.6
blood

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 471
62.4
clinical

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 75
62.0
totally

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,069
65.2

Unranked opportunities

patients

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 198
decision

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 560
blood

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 471
clinical

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 75
totally

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 1,069

High competition keywords

access

Total apps: 333,757 • Major competitors: 12,342

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
provides

Total apps: 167,241 • Major competitors: 5,649

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
based

Total apps: 154,090 • Major competitors: 5,983

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
receive

Total apps: 148,378 • Major competitors: 4,838

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
making

Total apps: 122,454 • Major competitors: 6,584

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
device	68	100	60	80 106,231 competing apps Median installs: 3,375 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	6,738 major competitor apps
range	68	100	50	79 89,596 competing apps Median installs: 1,447 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	4,541 major competitor apps
michigan	70	100	28	44 597 competing apps Median installs: 758 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	11 major competitor apps
access	65	100	59	88 333,757 competing apps Median installs: 1,158 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	12,342 major competitor apps
patients	74	100	39	64 9,763 competing apps Median installs: 726 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	198 major competitor apps
technique	73	100	36	57 3,871 competing apps Median installs: 1,697 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	151 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	54	83 167,241 competing apps Median installs: 1,409 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	5,649 major competitor apps
devices	70	100	55	75 53,868 competing apps Median installs: 2,006 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	2,891 major competitor apps
guide	69	100	48	77 70,510 competing apps Median installs: 1,424 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	2,173 major competitor apps
receive	67	100	52	82 148,378 competing apps Median installs: 855 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	4,838 major competitor apps
across	69	100	61	79 84,826 competing apps Median installs: 1,690 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	4,649 major competitor apps
saving	71	100	47	72 31,143 competing apps Median installs: 1,771 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,720 major competitor apps
safe	69	100	55	77 66,155 competing apps Median installs: 1,936 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	3,892 major competitor apps
decision	74	100	41	65 11,208 competing apps Median installs: 1,953 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	560 major competitor apps
based	67	100	55	83 154,090 competing apps Median installs: 1,414 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	5,983 major competitor apps
children	71	100	46	72 31,622 competing apps Median installs: 2,794 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	2,023 major competitor apps
placement	73	100	36	58 4,161 competing apps Median installs: 1,365 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	147 major competitor apps
blood	74	100	41	62 8,248 competing apps Median installs: 4,230 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	471 major competitor apps
selection	70	100	48	74 45,315 competing apps Median installs: 1,876 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	2,471 major competitor apps
making	68	100	52	81 122,454 competing apps Median installs: 1,889 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	6,584 major competitor apps
guidance	72	100	43	69 21,990 competing apps Median installs: 1,040 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	635 major competitor apps
highly	72	100	45	69 20,971 competing apps Median installs: 2,812 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,354 major competitor apps
clinical	74	100	37	62 7,743 competing apps Median installs: 817 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	75 major competitor apps
totally	74	100	44	65 12,216 competing apps Median installs: 7,797 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,069 major competitor apps
iv	70	100	28	45 676 competing apps Median installs: 2,531 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	22 major competitor apps

App Description

Safe IV selection

The majority of all hospitalized children require placement of a vascular access device to receive medications, for life-saving therapies and blood tests. But vascular access decision making in pediatric patients remains a complex, highly variable process.

The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravascular Catheters in Pediatrics (miniMAGIC) provides evidence-based guidance on intravenous catheter selection, device characteristics and insertion technique – from umbilical catheters to totally implanted venous devices – in pediatric patients, across a range of clinical indications.