AAGL Endo Classification

Developer: Medicinia Atividades de

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

3.4K installs

Ratings not yet available

170 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Monthly +10

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 40 keywords for AAGL Endo Classification in Google Play

Developer: Medicinia Atividades de Internet Ltda Category: medical Rating: 2.02

AAGL Endo Classification tracks 40 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 39 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.0, difficulty 44.4, best rank 4.

Allows surgeons to calculate AAGL’s endometriosis severity score.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 39 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

100%

Best rank 4 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.0

Top keyword: chosen

Avg difficulty

44.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

chosen

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 570
65.3
scoring

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 243
60.4
distribution

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 216
62.6
determine

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 512
65.7
scale

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 494
63.8

Unranked opportunities

chosen

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 570
scoring

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 243
distribution

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 216
determine

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 512
scale

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 494

High competition keywords

designed

Total apps: 260,960 • Major competitors: 7,547

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
using

Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
create

Total apps: 201,739 • Major competitors: 13,289

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.5
allows

Total apps: 177,711 • Major competitors: 5,773

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
used

Total apps: 116,194 • Major competitors: 4,649

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
complexity	73	100	36	56 3,219 competing apps Median installs: 1,128 Avg rating: 2.0	4	4	149 major competitor apps
level	68	100	55	80 109,650 competing apps Median installs: 1,859 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	6,423 major competitor apps
within	68	100	52	80 102,786 competing apps Median installs: 1,281 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	3,681 major competitor apps
used	68	100	55	81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,649 major competitor apps
designed	65	100	54	86 260,960 competing apps Median installs: 723 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	7,547 major competitor apps
using	66	100	58	85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	10,965 major competitor apps
score	71	100	49	74 42,475 competing apps Median installs: 1,452 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,898 major competitor apps
create	66	100	62	84 201,739 competing apps Median installs: 2,495 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	13,289 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	53	84 177,711 competing apps Median installs: 1,248 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,773 major competitor apps
across	69	100	64	78 83,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,631 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,203 major competitor apps
calculate	72	100	44	70 24,727 competing apps Median installs: 1,193 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	699 major competitor apps
points	70	100	48	76 56,017 competing apps Median installs: 1,881 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,333 major competitor apps
component	72	100	72	54 2,487 competing apps Median installs: 954 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	102 major competitor apps
chosen	74	100	42	65 12,529 competing apps Median installs: 2,514 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	570 major competitor apps
along	71	100	50	74 42,109 competing apps Median installs: 2,073 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	2,234 major competitor apps
scoring	74	100	39	60 6,187 competing apps Median installs: 1,159 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	243 major competitor apps
distribution	74	100	39	63 8,529 competing apps Median installs: 1,073 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	216 major competitor apps
system	68	100	53	80 101,213 competing apps Median installs: 1,229 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	3,591 major competitor apps
operating	73	100	48	68 18,178 competing apps Median installs: 1,482 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	757 major competitor apps
determine	74	100	41	66 13,262 competing apps Median installs: 2,328 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	512 major competitor apps
scale	74	100	42	64 10,122 competing apps Median installs: 1,250 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	494 major competitor apps
scores	73	100	44	68 18,225 competing apps Median installs: 1,552 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	663 major competitor apps
total	71	100	47	72 32,896 competing apps Median installs: 1,736 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,666 major competitor apps
basis	74	100	43	62 7,984 competing apps Median installs: 2,033 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	247 major competitor apps
closely	73	100	54	56 3,238 competing apps Median installs: 1,365 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	113 major competitor apps

App Description

Allows surgeons to calculate AAGL’s endometriosis severity score.

The sum of the component scores across all anatomic sites defines the total score, which is used to determine the complexity stage.

The 3 cut points along the distribution of the AAGL total score were chosen using receiver operating characteristic curves to create 4 stages within the AAGL scoring system that most closely corresponded with the 4-level scale of surgical complexity for endometriosis designed to categorize each surgery on the basis of its highest-complexity task.

Stage 1 ≤ 8 points
Stage 2 9-15 points
Stage 3 16-21 points
Stage 4 >21 points