HAL 2

Developer: CEDETi UC

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

4.9K installs

Ratings not yet available

229 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +7.00

Steady

Monthly +14

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 49 keywords for HAL 2 in Google Play

Developer: CEDETi UC Category: tools

HAL 2 tracks 49 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 49 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.6, difficulty 42.3.

HAL 2 - Assessment Battery Accident proneness

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 49 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.6

Top keyword: presence

Avg difficulty

42.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

presence

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 293
63.7
aimed

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 172
61.9
applied

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 420
62.9
assessment

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 127
61.2
tested

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 430
61.2

Unranked opportunities

presence

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 293
aimed

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 172
applied

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 420
assessment

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Competitors: 127
tested

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 430

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 284,047 • Major competitors: 15,704

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
designed

Total apps: 259,915 • Major competitors: 8,468

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
different

Total apps: 188,762 • Major competitors: 15,094

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
allows

Total apps: 177,150 • Major competitors: 6,464

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
people

Total apps: 104,282 • Major competitors: 5,797

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
single	69	100	51	78 76,030 competing apps Median installs: 2,322 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4,305 major competitor apps
individual	71	100	49	73 38,315 competing apps Median installs: 1,430 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,151 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	54	86 259,915 competing apps Median installs: 857 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	8,468 major competitor apps
aimed	74	100	38	62 7,772 competing apps Median installs: 977 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	172 major competitor apps
people	68	100	54	80 104,282 competing apps Median installs: 2,912 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,797 major competitor apps
help	65	100	58	87 284,047 competing apps Median installs: 2,040 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	15,704 major competitor apps
score	70	100	48	74 43,064 competing apps Median installs: 1,557 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,053 major competitor apps
individuals	73	100	41	67 17,088 competing apps Median installs: 593 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	400 major competitor apps
test	68	100	51	79 98,002 competing apps Median installs: 2,188 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,377 major competitor apps
format	73	100	45	68 19,902 competing apps Median installs: 2,583 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,058 major competitor apps
presence	75	100	40	64 10,062 competing apps Median installs: 1,428 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	293 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	53	84 177,150 competing apps Median installs: 1,475 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	6,464 major competitor apps
case	72	100	45	71 28,030 competing apps Median installs: 2,152 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,121 major competitor apps
applied	74	100	42	63 8,888 competing apps Median installs: 6,795 Avg rating: 4.4	—	—	420 major competitor apps
tablet	72	100	56	70 23,976 competing apps Median installs: 5,286 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,524 major competitor apps
identify	72	100	48	70 25,181 competing apps Median installs: 1,506 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,093 major competitor apps
different	66	100	56	84 188,762 competing apps Median installs: 5,234 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	15,094 major competitor apps
assessment	74	100	37	61 7,028 competing apps Median installs: 1,160 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	127 major competitor apps
result	73	100	43	68 19,634 competing apps Median installs: 2,120 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	790 major competitor apps
instrument	73	100	38	57 3,572 competing apps Median installs: 4,386 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	242 major competitor apps
accident	72	100	38	55 2,723 competing apps Median installs: 7,908 Avg rating: 3.8	—	—	208 major competitor apps
developed	70	100	46	75 51,460 competing apps Median installs: 1,368 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,361 major competitor apps
attention	73	100	44	69 20,785 competing apps Median installs: 3,146 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,261 major competitor apps
automatically	69	100	54	77 66,856 competing apps Median installs: 2,765 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	3,504 major competitor apps
types	70	100	51	74 44,800 competing apps Median installs: 4,531 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,870 major competitor apps

App Description

HAL 2 - Assessment Battery Accident proneness

Battery Evaluation Accident proneness (HAL 2) is an individual assessment instrument in CEDETI Tablet format developed by UC, which aims to identify individuals who are prone to having accidents. 2 Battery HAL is aimed at evaluating people from years 18 0 months onwards. It is designed to be applied independently and self-guided workers, advancing automatically and successively different types of test. Despite being self-guided, the presence of an evaluator who can help evaluated in case of difficulties is recommended.

As a result of evaluating a single score that discriminates the presence or not of the propensity to accidentarse in each of the workers tested is obtained. This score is called indicator Propensity to Accident (IPA), which allows discrimination in the study population. The IPA is composed of 4 indices: respect for rules, attention to detail, intelligence and attention test errors.