TENI
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 66 keywords for TENI in Google Play
TENI tracks 66 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 66 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 72.1, difficulty 41.0.
To build profiles of cognitive strengths and weaknesses
Tracked keywords
66
0 ranked • 66 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
72.1
Top keyword: obtain
Avg difficulty
41.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.7
obtain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 601
- 62.9
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 420
- 62.8
lasting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 393
- 63.5
response
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 315
- 65.4
speech
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 674
Unranked opportunities
obtain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 601
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 420
lasting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 393
response
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 315
speech
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.9 • Competitors: 674
High competition keywords
designed
Total apps: 259,915 • Major competitors: 8,468
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
test
Total apps: 98,002 • Major competitors: 5,377
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
build
Total apps: 83,393 • Major competitors: 6,399
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
performance
Total apps: 66,808 • Major competitors: 2,014
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.0
levels
Total apps: 66,335 • Major competitors: 5,448
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| internal | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 16,941 competing apps Median installs: 1,067 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 613 major competitor apps |
| external | 73 | 100 | 47 | 67 16,916 competing apps Median installs: 1,511 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 53 | 76 62,481 competing apps Median installs: 3,040 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,702 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 61,391 competing apps Median installs: 966 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,314 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 259,915 competing apps Median installs: 857 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,468 major competitor apps |
| profile | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 39,261 competing apps Median installs: 1,055 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,755 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 13,361 competing apps Median installs: 2,965 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 601 major competitor apps |
| operation | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,533 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 757 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 37,292 competing apps Median installs: 4,235 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,000 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 98,002 competing apps Median installs: 2,188 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,377 major competitor apps |
| professionals | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 27,305 competing apps Median installs: 473 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 396 major competitor apps |
| performance | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 66,808 competing apps Median installs: 957 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,014 major competitor apps |
| applied | 74 | 100 | 42 | 63 8,888 competing apps Median installs: 6,795 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 420 major competitor apps |
| functions | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 31,260 competing apps Median installs: 3,047 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,454 major competitor apps |
| tablet | 72 | 100 | 56 | 70 23,976 competing apps Median installs: 5,286 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,524 major competitor apps |
| done | 73 | 100 | 48 | 68 17,870 competing apps Median installs: 3,022 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 871 major competitor apps |
| delivers | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 21,022 competing apps Median installs: 1,303 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 855 major competitor apps |
| allowing | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 55,914 competing apps Median installs: 1,148 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,118 major competitor apps |
| build | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 83,393 competing apps Median installs: 2,491 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6,399 major competitor apps |
| description | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 14,625 competing apps Median installs: 1,400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 495 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 47 | 69 22,488 competing apps Median installs: 2,896 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,262 major competitor apps |
| levels | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 66,335 competing apps Median installs: 3,966 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,448 major competitor apps |
| scales | 72 | 100 | 33 | 51 1,594 competing apps Median installs: 1,528 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 64 major competitor apps |
| lasting | 74 | 100 | 41 | 63 8,804 competing apps Median installs: 982 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 393 major competitor apps |
| memory | 72 | 100 | 49 | 70 23,425 competing apps Median installs: 3,437 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,442 major competitor apps |
App Description
To build profiles of cognitive strengths and weaknesses
TENI is a neuropsychological evaluation test designed to build profiles of cognitive strengths and weaknesses.
With this battery operation is evaluated attention, visuospatial development, systems memory, language and executive functions in children from 3: 0 to the 9:11 years
Who can apply?
It is designed to be applied by psychologists, speech therapists and professionals trained in neuropsychology.
Psychometric characteristics
TENI has been standardized with 608 children, from three socio-economic levels. Each of its scales shows levels of reliability ranges ranging from "good" to "excellent".
evidence of validity from the content, the response process, the internal consistency and relationship with external variables is provided. It is oriented to the standard and has been designed with a functional modular conception of cognition.
Description
TENI consists of 8 sets of ten components that assess psychological processes (visuospatial development, attention, memory systems, language and executive functions). Delivers a performance profile for function with standardized scores.
The evaluation is done through a tablet individually lasting between 20 to 30 minutes. Correction is automatic, allowing to obtain reliable results quickly.