Swift-Track

Developer: Aniruddha Telemetry Systems

Category: Business

Add App to Comparison

218 installs

ratings

+8.00 weekly installs

trend steady

+19 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 65 keywords for Swift-Track in Google Play

Developer: Aniruddha Telemetry Systems Category: business

Swift-Track tracks 65 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 65 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.3, difficulty 44.6.

Swift-Track is an app designed for vehicle transporters for efficiently tracking

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 65 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.3

Top keyword: expenses

Avg difficulty

44.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

expenses

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 353
63.9
simplifies

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 278
65.8
spot

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 837
66.2
expense

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 225
62.0
unnecessary

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 451
64.6

Unranked opportunities

expenses

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 353
simplifies

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 278
spot

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 837
expense

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 225
unnecessary

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 451

High competition keywords

easy

Total apps: 331,281 • Major competitors: 16,423

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
make

Total apps: 330,586 • Major competitors: 20,510

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
designed

Total apps: 264,262 • Major competitors: 8,563

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
every

Total apps: 262,875 • Major competitors: 14,709

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.0
features

Total apps: 250,085 • Major competitors: 14,980

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
easy	65	100	56	88 331,281 competing apps Median installs: 2,450 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	16,423 major competitor apps
make	65	100	58	88 330,586 competing apps Median installs: 2,478 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	20,510 major competitor apps
users	67	100	53	82 137,724 competing apps Median installs: 1,379 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	5,538 major competitor apps
designed	65	100	54	86 264,262 competing apps Median installs: 799 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	8,563 major competitor apps
management	68	100	50	80 109,326 competing apps Median installs: 566 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,578 major competitor apps
process	70	100	48	76 55,954 competing apps Median installs: 997 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,908 major competitor apps
including	67	100	56	82 131,253 competing apps Median installs: 2,547 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	7,753 major competitor apps
tracking	69	100	48	77 66,593 competing apps Median installs: 412 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,655 major competitor apps
helping	71	100	45	73 36,548 competing apps Median installs: 984 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	1,240 major competitor apps
accurate	70	100	48	75 50,895 competing apps Median installs: 1,434 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	2,486 major competitor apps
track	66	100	53	84 192,873 competing apps Median installs: 539 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	6,108 major competitor apps
quickly	68	100	57	81 120,122 competing apps Median installs: 1,281 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	5,242 major competitor apps
financial	70	100	47	75 48,434 competing apps Median installs: 1,249 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	1,932 major competitor apps
vehicle	71	100	46	72 33,653 competing apps Median installs: 1,698 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,785 major competitor apps
easily	66	100	57	85 218,634 competing apps Median installs: 1,492 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	9,428 major competitor apps
business	68	100	50	79 87,867 competing apps Median installs: 832 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	3,012 major competitor apps
informed	69	100	47	77 63,558 competing apps Median installs: 384 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,279 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	53	84 179,097 competing apps Median installs: 1,436 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	6,599 major competitor apps
without	66	100	56	85 214,258 competing apps Median installs: 3,453 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	11,627 major competitor apps
feature	69	100	53	78 77,446 competing apps Median installs: 3,090 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	4,688 major competitor apps
every	65	100	56	86 262,875 competing apps Median installs: 2,262 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	14,709 major competitor apps
expenses	74	100	40	64 10,169 competing apps Median installs: 1,085 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	353 major competitor apps
identify	72	100	50	70 25,704 competing apps Median installs: 1,431 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	1,117 major competitor apps
features	66	100	58	86 250,085 competing apps Median installs: 2,692 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	14,980 major competitor apps
allowing	70	100	49	76 59,182 competing apps Median installs: 901 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	2,156 major competitor apps

App Description

Swift-Track is an app designed for vehicle transporters for efficiently tracking

One of the primary features of Swift-Track is its ability to track and categorize expenses associated with vehicle transportation. The app allows transporters to easily log every expense tied to their trips, including fuel, tolls, repairs, maintenance, insurance, and more. Without proper expense tracking, these costs can quickly accumulate, negatively impacting profitability. Swift-Track simplifies this process by allowing users to input expenses as they occur, making it easy to maintain an accurate record of all costs.

The app categorizes expenses in real-time, helping users identify which areas of their business incur the highest costs. By reviewing detailed expense logs, transporters can spot patterns, optimize routes, and make better-informed decisions to reduce unnecessary spending. This feature not only aids in daily financial management but also helps with long-term cost forecasting and budgeting.