Arkikus - Vitoria-Gasteiz 1850
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 72 keywords for Arkikus - Vitoria-Gasteiz 1850 in Google Play
Arkikus - Vitoria-Gasteiz 1850 tracks 72 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 72 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 67.8, difficulty 44.3.
App for the virtual reconstruction of the city of Vitoria-Gasteiz in 1850 AD
Tracked keywords
72
0 ranked • 72 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
67.8
Top keyword: upon
Avg difficulty
44.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.5
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 753
- 68.3
certain
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,225
- 70.9
environment
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,983
- 62.8
town
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 953
- 62.6
la
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 415
Unranked opportunities
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 753
certain
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,225
environment
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Competitors: 1,983
town
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Competitors: 953
la
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 415
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
different
Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| environment | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 14,040 competing apps Median installs: 47,768 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,983 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 42,168 competing apps Median installs: 26,988 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,209 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 60 | 77 31,688 competing apps Median installs: 26,732 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,809 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 64 | 81 56,908 competing apps Median installs: 30,274 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,627 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| town | 72 | 100 | 51 | 63 4,715 competing apps Median installs: 70,448 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 953 major competitor apps |
| la | 72 | 100 | 42 | 63 4,593 competing apps Median installs: 25,239 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 415 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| de | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 7,241 competing apps Median installs: 22,978 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 644 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 55 | 74 20,442 competing apps Median installs: 54,128 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,169 major competitor apps |
| city | 70 | 100 | 55 | 76 26,771 competing apps Median installs: 51,496 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,390 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 8,881 competing apps Median installs: 28,496 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 753 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 16,618 competing apps Median installs: 30,552 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,742 major competitor apps |
| devices | 70 | 100 | 67 | 75 25,598 competing apps Median installs: 36,807 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,146 major competitor apps |
| display | 70 | 100 | 57 | 75 23,879 competing apps Median installs: 32,093 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,298 major competitor apps |
| interpretation | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,102 competing apps Median installs: 25,462 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 88 major competitor apps |
| municipal | 69 | 100 | 33 | 51 985 competing apps Median installs: 13,475 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 61 major competitor apps |
| spaces | 71 | 100 | 48 | 58 2,440 competing apps Median installs: 25,928 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 267 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 100,748 competing apps Median installs: 49,942 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,575 major competitor apps |
| show | 69 | 100 | 60 | 79 39,281 competing apps Median installs: 56,395 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,243 major competitor apps |
| present | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 13,302 competing apps Median installs: 25,259 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 981 major competitor apps |
| main | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 32,327 competing apps Median installs: 33,651 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,349 major competitor apps |
App Description
App for the virtual reconstruction of the city of Vitoria-Gasteiz in 1850 AD
The virtual reconstruction included in this app aims to show the architectural atmosphere that the town of Vitoria-Gasteiz (Basque Country, Spain) showed in 1850, before the demolition of the gateways that protected the medieval walls and its subsequent modernisation.
All digital content included in this application has been elaborated on the basis of the main image, documentary and archeological resources available at the present time for the reconstructed spaces or, where sources are lacking for certain elements, by using chronologically, geographically and stylistically proximate architectural and/or ornamental parallels, in an attempt to achieve the maximum degree of historical accuracy.The reconstructions that are included display an interpretation of the heritage environment agreed upon by different specialists at the date of creation of the app; new research may well refine this interpretation further.
Acknowledgments: Binary Soul SCP, Ismael García (Enklabe KST), María José Marinas (Archivo Municipal de Vitoria-Gasteiz), José Antonio Sáinz (Archivo Histórico Provincial de Álava), Javier Niso and Miguel Loza (Iterbide SC), Egoitz Alfaro and Francisca Vives (UPV/EHU), Nagore González, François Monciero, Nick Gardner, Fernando Izar de la Fuente, Enrique Loza, Joseba Ordoño.