Virtual Enkarterri
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 83 keywords for Virtual Enkarterri in Google Play
Virtual Enkarterri tracks 83 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 83 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.5, difficulty 46.0.
App for the virtual reconstruction of Enkarterri's historical heritage
Tracked keywords
83
0 ranked • 83 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.5
Top keyword: age
Avg difficulty
46.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.4
age
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,318
- 62.8
town
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 953
- 62.6
la
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 415
- 66.0
de
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 644
- 68.8
documents
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 71.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,198
Unranked opportunities
age
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 1,318
town
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Competitors: 953
la
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 415
de
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 644
documents
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 71.2 • Competitors: 1,198
High competition keywords
experience
Total apps: 118,077 • Major competitors: 15,561
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.8
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
information
Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
designed
Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
available
Total apps: 92,463 • Major competitors: 9,952
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| experience | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 118,077 competing apps Median installs: 39,819 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 15,561 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 42,168 competing apps Median installs: 26,988 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,209 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 64 | 81 56,908 competing apps Median installs: 30,274 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,627 major competitor apps |
| modern | 70 | 100 | 52 | 76 27,345 competing apps Median installs: 33,314 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,186 major competitor apps |
| age | 73 | 100 | 48 | 68 10,050 competing apps Median installs: 46,004 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,318 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| town | 72 | 100 | 51 | 63 4,715 competing apps Median installs: 70,448 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 953 major competitor apps |
| la | 72 | 100 | 42 | 63 4,593 competing apps Median installs: 25,239 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 415 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 57 | 79 40,681 competing apps Median installs: 35,653 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,828 major competitor apps |
| de | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 7,241 competing apps Median installs: 22,978 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 644 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 55 | 74 20,442 competing apps Median installs: 54,128 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,169 major competitor apps |
| pro | 71 | 100 | 64 | 72 16,544 competing apps Median installs: 52,159 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,522 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 64 | 83 74,834 competing apps Median installs: 53,568 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 11,689 major competitor apps |
| unique experience | 70 | 100 | 36 | 54 1,485 competing apps Median installs: 28,021 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 126 major competitor apps |
| el | 70 | 100 | 38 | 56 1,956 competing apps Median installs: 28,590 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 165 major competitor apps |
| original | 71 | 100 | 58 | 73 18,382 competing apps Median installs: 49,188 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,593 major competitor apps |
| immersive | 71 | 100 | 64 | 72 15,658 competing apps Median installs: 53,616 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,420 major competitor apps |
| interpretation | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,102 competing apps Median installs: 25,462 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 88 major competitor apps |
| possible | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 23,344 competing apps Median installs: 31,057 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,330 major competitor apps |
| documents | 72 | 100 | 71 | 69 10,646 competing apps Median installs: 29,384 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,198 major competitor apps |
| show | 69 | 100 | 60 | 79 39,281 competing apps Median installs: 56,395 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,243 major competitor apps |
App Description
App for the virtual reconstruction of Enkarterri's historical heritage
The virtual reconstruction included in this app aims to show how three outstanding historical sites from Enkarterri (Bizkaia, Basque Country), may have looked in the past, in an immersive and unique experience that shows, in a realistic way, ancient architecture and scenes of selected locations that are key to understand the history and evolution of the region. The three sites are the medieval town and castle of Balmaseda, and the pre-roman hillfort and the Modern Age ironworks-mill of Bolunburu.
All the digital content on the mobile app has been developed based on real graphic, documentary and archaeological sources for the reconstructed spaces. Where such original documents for particular elements are no longer available, parallel architectural and/or decorative examples from the same period of time, region and style have been used to ensure the greatest possible historical accuracy. The reconstructions included show an interpretation of the historical surroundings designed in conjunction with specialists based on the information available when the app was created. Future investigations may subsequently alter these interpretations.
Acknowledgements: Valentín Ibarra (Asociación Pro Balma), José Luis Solaun (UPV/EHU), Juanjo Cepeda (Universidad de Cantabria), María José Torrecilla (La Encartada Fabrika-Museoa), Marta Zabala (El Pobaleko Burdinola), Koldo Díez de Mena, Ttak! Drone Works, Asociación de Recreación Histórica Mitos.