ARCF

Developer: Denver Saldanha

Category: Education

Add App to Comparison

4.00 installs

Ratings not yet available

MAU not available

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 24 keywords for ARCF in Google Play

Developer: Denver Saldanha Category: education

ARCF tracks 24 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 24 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 42.0.

Project ARCF helps you chose more eco-friendly products using AR

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 24 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.1

Top keyword: university

Avg difficulty

42.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

university

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 169
66.1
ar

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 271
59.8
initiative

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 34.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 77
55.8
attempt

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 151
58.4
label

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 36.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 164
56.2

Unranked opportunities

university

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 169
ar

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.5 • Competitors: 271
initiative

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 34.5 • Competitors: 77
attempt

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.0 • Competitors: 151
label

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 36.4 • Competitors: 164

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 282,188 • Major competitors: 14,387

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
using

Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
choose

Total apps: 195,566 • Major competitors: 12,116

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
friendly

Total apps: 148,889 • Major competitors: 4,755

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.0
helps

Total apps: 121,520 • Major competitors: 4,496

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
choose	66	100	56	84 195,566 competing apps Median installs: 2,302 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	12,116 major competitor apps
using	66	100	58	85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	10,965 major competitor apps
help	65	100	60	87 282,188 competing apps Median installs: 1,657 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	14,387 major competitor apps
university	74	100	41	66 14,157 competing apps Median installs: 1,522 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	169 major competitor apps
visit	70	100	52	75 53,466 competing apps Median installs: 1,842 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	2,823 major competitor apps
products	69	100	51	77 66,925 competing apps Median installs: 933 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	2,336 major competitor apps
customers	70	100	48	76 57,594 competing apps Median installs: 608 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,530 major competitor apps
develop	71	100	47	71 30,032 competing apps Median installs: 2,457 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,657 major competitor apps
initiative	73	100	35	56 3,210 competing apps Median installs: 1,302 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	77 major competitor apps
project	72	100	44	69 22,048 competing apps Median installs: 662 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	508 major competitor apps
carbon footprint	70	100	32	44 558 competing apps Median installs: 571 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	16 major competitor apps
friendly	67	100	52	82 148,889 competing apps Median installs: 925 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	4,755 major competitor apps
carbon	72	100	37	54 2,455 competing apps Median installs: 872 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	68 major competitor apps
uses	71	100	51	73 37,714 competing apps Median installs: 2,366 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,728 major competitor apps
helps	68	100	57	81 121,520 competing apps Median installs: 1,144 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,496 major competitor apps
ar	74	100	48	60 5,660 competing apps Median installs: 946 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	271 major competitor apps
attempt	73	100	38	58 4,650 competing apps Median installs: 825 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	151 major competitor apps
footprint	71	100	33	49 1,251 competing apps Median installs: 915 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	40 major competitor apps
chose	72	100	35	54 2,506 competing apps Median installs: 7,541 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	116 major competitor apps
denver	69	100	25	39 271 competing apps Median installs: 1,018 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	9 major competitor apps
products using	69	100	27	41 392 competing apps Median installs: 943 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	13 major competitor apps
label	73	100	36	56 3,375 competing apps Median installs: 1,676 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	164 major competitor apps
help customers	70	100	27	43 469 competing apps Median installs: 1,121 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	20 major competitor apps
customers choose	67	100	20	31 89 competing apps Median installs: 814 Avg rating: 1.4	—	—	5 major competitor apps

App Description

Project ARCF helps you chose more eco-friendly products using AR

Project ARCF is an initiative by Denver Saldanha for the University of Limerick. Project ARCF is an attempt to develop a Carbon Footprint Label that uses AR to help customers choose more eco-friendly products during their visit to a supermarket.