Soil Consolidation
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 101 keywords for Soil Consolidation in Google Play
Soil Consolidation tracks 101 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 101 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 44.4.
Testing app for up to 4 Consolidometers simultaneously using the GCTS DataCube-C
Tracked keywords
101
0 ranked • 101 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: units
Avg difficulty
44.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.9
units
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 397
- 63.5
calling
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 61.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 744
- 64.9
mobile device
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 539
- 60.2
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 250
- 65.5
commercial
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 392
Unranked opportunities
units
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 397
calling
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 61.7 • Competitors: 744
mobile device
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 539
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 250
commercial
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 392
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 385,850 • Major competitors: 16,372
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
mobile
Total apps: 280,152 • Major competitors: 10,258
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4
designed
Total apps: 261,871 • Major competitors: 7,629
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
using
Total apps: 222,760 • Major competitors: 11,093
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
easily
Total apps: 214,726 • Major competitors: 8,338
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ready | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 106,923 competing apps Median installs: 3,244 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 8,467 major competitor apps |
| changes | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 27,896 competing apps Median installs: 1,246 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,027 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 63 | 80 107,472 competing apps Median installs: 2,652 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,156 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,709 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 261,871 competing apps Median installs: 726 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 7,629 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 222,760 competing apps Median installs: 2,297 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 11,093 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 59 | 89 385,850 competing apps Median installs: 1,264 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 16,372 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 35,726 competing apps Median installs: 1,361 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,403 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,152 competing apps Median installs: 1,245 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 10,258 major competitor apps |
| program | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 43,195 competing apps Median installs: 1,483 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,234 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,038 competing apps Median installs: 2,121 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,024 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 63,818 competing apps Median installs: 523 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,633 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 96,461 competing apps Median installs: 2,011 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| effective | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 37,617 competing apps Median installs: 938 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,137 major competitor apps |
| tests | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,961 competing apps Median installs: 1,590 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 596 major competitor apps |
| consolidation | 69 | 100 | 25 | 40 317 competing apps Median installs: 2,467 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 166,176 competing apps Median installs: 1,227 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,004 major competitor apps |
| easily | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 214,726 competing apps Median installs: 1,310 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 8,338 major competitor apps |
| together | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 43,067 competing apps Median installs: 1,751 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,243 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 54 | 84 178,103 competing apps Median installs: 1,251 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,820 major competitor apps |
| next | 69 | 100 | 55 | 79 87,064 competing apps Median installs: 1,762 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,136 major competitor apps |
| files | 72 | 100 | 65 | 71 28,419 competing apps Median installs: 5,605 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,391 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 143,402 competing apps Median installs: 1,605 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,128 major competitor apps |
| units | 74 | 100 | 41 | 63 8,901 competing apps Median installs: 1,679 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 397 major competitor apps |
| includes | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 66,636 competing apps Median installs: 2,094 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,571 major competitor apps |
App Description
Testing app for up to 4 Consolidometers simultaneously using the GCTS DataCube-C
Cons-4 is designed to easily and inexpensively automate existing incremental-loading consolidometer or oedometer apparatuses including traditional dead weight units as well as pneumatic devices.
This program automatically acquires deformation rates on one-dimensional oedometer test data during incremental loading of a saturated soil sample. Cons-4 software, together with the GCTS DataCube-C* wireless data acquisition device can simultaneously monitor up to 4 different oedometer tests on your mobile device through Bluetooth connection.
Cons-4 provides real-time graphs of all ongoing tests and is also capable to display previous tests. It also performs real-time calculations of the relevant parameters including the end of primary consolidation. By calling your attention on your mobile device that the test is ready for the next load increment, it allows to significantly reduce total testing time while minimizing potential user errors increasing data reliability.
Complete PDF test reports including Taylor’s (Root Square) and Casagrande’s (Logarithm) calculations are automatically produced and easily displayed, printed, or e-mailed. Raw data files can also be exported for further analysis or manipulation.
*GCTS Testing Systems offers an inexpensive Consolidation Test Upgrade kit that includes the DataCube-C Data Acquisition device together with 4 displacement sensors and mounting hardware that adapts to most commercial consolidation apparatuses.
Relevant Standards:
ASTM D2435 / D2435M - 11(2020)
Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading
ASTM D4546 - 14e1
Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional Swell or Collapse of Soils
AASHTO T216
One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils
ISO/TS 17892-5:2004
Incremental Loading Oedometer Test
BS 1377-5:1990
Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. Compressibility, permeability, and durability tests