Unconfined Test
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 99 keywords for Unconfined Test in Google Play
Unconfined Test tracks 99 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 99 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 44.1.
Unconfined Compression Test App For the PLT-2W
Tracked keywords
99
0 ranked • 99 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: equipped
Avg difficulty
44.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.2
equipped
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 514
- 59.3
calculates
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 128
- 62.7
wireless
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 463
- 65.7
direction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 752
- 65.8
load
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 900
Unranked opportunities
equipped
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 514
calculates
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.5 • Competitors: 128
wireless
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.3 • Competitors: 463
direction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 752
load
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Competitors: 900
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 385,850 • Major competitors: 16,372
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
designed
Total apps: 261,871 • Major competitors: 7,629
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
easily
Total apps: 214,726 • Major competitors: 8,338
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
data
Total apps: 180,122 • Major competitors: 6,588
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
real
Total apps: 178,133 • Major competitors: 11,974
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| connected | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 73,623 competing apps Median installs: 574 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,172 major competitor apps |
| place | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 99,560 competing apps Median installs: 942 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,191 major competitor apps |
| simply | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 84,171 competing apps Median installs: 1,452 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,387 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,709 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 261,871 competing apps Median installs: 726 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 7,629 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 59 | 89 385,850 competing apps Median installs: 1,264 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 16,372 major competitor apps |
| connect | 67 | 100 | 56 | 81 128,866 competing apps Median installs: 882 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,584 major competitor apps |
| rate | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 50,100 competing apps Median installs: 2,182 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,057 major competitor apps |
| account | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 93,529 competing apps Median installs: 1,752 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,671 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 42,371 competing apps Median installs: 2,871 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,099 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,274 competing apps Median installs: 1,693 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,707 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 96,461 competing apps Median installs: 2,011 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| test results | 71 | 100 | 37 | 50 1,343 competing apps Median installs: 1,950 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| easily | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 214,726 competing apps Median installs: 1,310 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 8,338 major competitor apps |
| apply | 70 | 100 | 52 | 74 43,968 competing apps Median installs: 4,506 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,985 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 178,133 competing apps Median installs: 1,935 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 11,974 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 54 | 84 178,103 competing apps Median installs: 1,251 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,820 major competitor apps |
| made | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 89,160 competing apps Median installs: 1,695 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,595 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 143,402 competing apps Median installs: 1,605 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,128 major competitor apps |
| threshold | 71 | 100 | 29 | 47 943 competing apps Median installs: 1,757 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| preparation | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,134 competing apps Median installs: 1,090 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 302 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 58,426 competing apps Median installs: 3,235 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,019 major competitor apps |
| equipped | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 12,336 competing apps Median installs: 1,807 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 514 major competitor apps |
| displayed | 72 | 100 | 46 | 69 21,272 competing apps Median installs: 1,884 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 738 major competitor apps |
| display | 70 | 100 | 52 | 76 56,007 competing apps Median installs: 1,297 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,181 major competitor apps |
App Description
Unconfined Compression Test App For the PLT-2W
All steps of test preparation can be easily read and transmitted to the application for ease-of-use. The operator can place a calibrated specimen in the cell of the Point Load Testing System for calibration of the crosshead position. The application uses a two-point calibration for the crosshead position.
Using this application, specimen measurements can be made with ease. By simply placing the specimen in the apparatus and applying a small load, the height of the specimen can be automatically measured. The user can continue to apply a load to the specimen, as the application will automatically begin the test once the height has been measured at the threshold load.
The application automatically records the load and the height of the specimen during the test and creates a graph of the data in real-time. The unconfined compressive strength of the specimen will be automatically calculated and displayed at the end of the test. The application calculates and records the stress and strain on the specimen during testing, and a graph of this data can also be viewed in real-time. It also automatically calculates the Tangent Modulus at 50% strength. A real time display of the loading rate helps the user apply loads at the appropriate rate.
After performing the test, the data can be emailed direction from the application as a CSV spreadsheet. Test results are also saved in the application for later viewing.
This application also makes automatic corrections to the data to account for the frame deformation compliance. This correction gives the frame a “Virtual Infinite Stiffness” and all results are presented with this correction already performed. This means that the results given are extremely accurate.
This application must connect once to a GCTS Wireless Point Load Testing System before it can be used. Once it has connected to a system, the application may be opened and data may be viewed from any location.