LMoCA
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 35 keywords for LMoCA in Google Play
LMoCA tracks 35 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 35 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 43.7.
Latvian Museum of Contemporary Art's Augmented Reality Application
Tracked keywords
35
0 ranked • 35 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: object
Avg difficulty
43.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.7
object
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 669
- 64.9
mobile device
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 598
- 63.5
landscape
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 615
- 64.4
reality
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 591
- 63.7
scale
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 523
Unranked opportunities
object
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 669
mobile device
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 598
landscape
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 615
reality
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Competitors: 591
scale
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 523
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 280,368 • Major competitors: 11,033
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
allows
Total apps: 179,058 • Major competitors: 6,594
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
see
Total apps: 166,657 • Major competitors: 8,370
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
users
Total apps: 137,673 • Major competitors: 5,543
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
device
Total apps: 106,281 • Major competitors: 6,742
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| navigation | 71 | 100 | 50 | 71 30,377 competing apps Median installs: 1,807 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,239 major competitor apps |
| augmented reality | 73 | 100 | 42 | 59 5,162 competing apps Median installs: 641 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 149 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 106,281 competing apps Median installs: 3,370 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 6,742 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 137,673 competing apps Median installs: 1,375 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,543 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,368 competing apps Median installs: 1,392 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 11,033 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,933 competing apps Median installs: 4,216 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,982 major competitor apps |
| meet | 70 | 100 | 55 | 76 57,154 competing apps Median installs: 1,926 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 3,795 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 179,058 competing apps Median installs: 1,434 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 6,594 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 166,657 competing apps Median installs: 1,963 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 8,370 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 58,463 competing apps Median installs: 3,421 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 3,315 major competitor apps |
| possible | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 49,789 competing apps Median installs: 2,406 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,363 major competitor apps |
| object | 74 | 100 | 42 | 63 8,600 competing apps Median installs: 8,080 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 669 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 45,864 competing apps Median installs: 4,393 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,127 major competitor apps |
| mobile device | 74 | 100 | 44 | 65 11,725 competing apps Median installs: 3,022 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 598 major competitor apps |
| show | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 65,864 competing apps Median installs: 6,314 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,864 major competitor apps |
| landscape | 74 | 100 | 42 | 63 9,624 competing apps Median installs: 5,019 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 615 major competitor apps |
| building | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,435 competing apps Median installs: 1,472 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,220 major competitor apps |
| reality | 74 | 100 | 44 | 64 11,033 competing apps Median installs: 1,483 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 591 major competitor apps |
| scale | 74 | 100 | 42 | 64 9,932 competing apps Median installs: 1,600 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 523 major competitor apps |
| placed | 74 | 100 | 39 | 62 7,934 competing apps Median installs: 2,519 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 368 major competitor apps |
| gps | 72 | 100 | 49 | 71 27,477 competing apps Median installs: 1,636 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,203 major competitor apps |
| augmented | 74 | 100 | 42 | 61 6,653 competing apps Median installs: 704 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| museum | 73 | 100 | 34 | 55 2,840 competing apps Median installs: 950 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 59 major competitor apps |
| away | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 24,024 competing apps Median installs: 2,890 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,605 major competitor apps |
| far | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 15,569 competing apps Median installs: 2,076 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 887 major competitor apps |
App Description
Latvian Museum of Contemporary Art's Augmented Reality Application
There are two possible reasons why the augmented reality function of the application does not work:
1. The mobile device does not meet the requirements of augmented reality technology;
2. The mobile device is too far away from the GPS coordinates of the object being viewed. In this case, the application will show navigation to the object.
