Accreditation Survey

Developer: QUAD A

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

101 installs

Ratings not yet available

5.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 48 keywords for Accreditation Survey in Google Play

Developer: QUAD A Category: medical

Accreditation Survey tracks 48 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 47 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.0, difficulty 43.6, best rank 7.

Surveyors can use a digital manual to score the standards and record results.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 47 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

100%

Best rank 7 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.0

Top keyword: consistent

Avg difficulty

43.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

consistent

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 371
65.1
processing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 547
65.1
speech

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 621
65.4
manner

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 124
66.1
shipping

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 409
64.1

Unranked opportunities

consistent

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 371
processing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Competitors: 547
speech

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Competitors: 621
manner

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 124
shipping

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 409

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 282,188 • Major competitors: 14,387

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
using

Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
data

Total apps: 181,410 • Major competitors: 6,597

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
support

Total apps: 170,973 • Major competitors: 7,327

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
platform

Total apps: 125,243 • Major competitors: 2,744

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
accredited	72	100	32	51 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 1,376 Avg rating: 1.8	7	7	57 major competitor apps
focus	70	100	52	76 59,847 competing apps Median installs: 762 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,845 major competitor apps
support	67	100	55	83 170,973 competing apps Median installs: 1,240 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	7,327 major competitor apps
digital	68	100	52	81 124,534 competing apps Median installs: 778 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	4,271 major competitor apps
using	66	100	58	85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	10,965 major competitor apps
help	65	100	60	87 282,188 competing apps Median installs: 1,657 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	14,387 major competitor apps
intuitive	68	100	52	81 117,141 competing apps Median installs: 740 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	4,121 major competitor apps
process	70	100	48	76 56,683 competing apps Median installs: 852 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,737 major competitor apps
score	71	100	49	74 42,475 competing apps Median installs: 1,452 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,898 major competitor apps
efficiency	73	100	41	67 16,510 competing apps Median installs: 374 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	314 major competitor apps
text	69	100	59	78 77,552 competing apps Median installs: 3,276 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	4,281 major competitor apps
improve	68	100	52	80 99,541 competing apps Median installs: 1,635 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,467 major competitor apps
manual	72	100	47	69 20,891 competing apps Median installs: 1,014 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	753 major competitor apps
accuracy	73	100	43	67 16,009 competing apps Median installs: 1,306 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	609 major competitor apps
professional	69	100	51	79 85,834 competing apps Median installs: 921 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	3,673 major competitor apps
reduce	72	100	47	70 24,741 competing apps Median installs: 909 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	750 major competitor apps
data	67	100	58	84 181,410 competing apps Median installs: 1,151 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	6,597 major competitor apps
allow	70	100	50	75 48,165 competing apps Median installs: 2,088 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,164 major competitor apps
streamline	73	100	41	68 17,968 competing apps Median installs: 168 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	159 major competitor apps
platform	68	100	51	81 125,243 competing apps Median installs: 632 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	2,744 major competitor apps
specialists	73	100	35	57 3,795 competing apps Median installs: 1,134 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	97 major competitor apps
consistent	74	100	41	65 12,270 competing apps Median installs: 423 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	371 major competitor apps
record	70	100	52	76 56,442 competing apps Median installs: 1,083 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	2,213 major competitor apps
developed	70	100	46	75 51,614 competing apps Median installs: 1,099 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,245 major competitor apps
results	70	100	47	74 45,276 competing apps Median installs: 1,427 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,378 major competitor apps

App Description

Surveyors can use a digital manual to score the standards and record results.

In an effort to streamline the survey process and documentation, QUAD- A has developed this app to help surveyors mitigate their work. Surveyors can now survey facilities using a digital manual to score standards and record survey results in a manner that is intuitive and consistent with existing professional competencies. At the end of the process, survey data will be transmitted to QUAD-A platform for processing.

The app aims to improve efficiency and accuracy using speech to text and photography, reduce shipping costs, and allow accreditation specialists to concentrate on assisting facilities and focus toward identified goals and objectives in an effort to support continual accreditation rather than processing paper.