AN: Juno

Developer: Apollo Neuroscience, Inc.

Category: Health & Fitness

348 installs

Ratings not yet available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 62 keywords for AN: Juno in Google Play

Developer: Apollo Neuroscience, Inc. Category: health_and_fitness

AN: Juno tracks 62 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 62 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.7, difficulty 51.0.

App for participants in studies of the Apollo Wearable

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 62 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.7

Top keyword: collected

Avg difficulty

51.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

collected

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 688
68.1
needed

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 968
67.7
id

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,271
67.6
intended

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 786
67.7
limited

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,812
71.3

Unranked opportunities

collected

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 688
needed

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 968
id

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 1,271
intended

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.3 • Competitors: 786
limited

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Competitors: 1,812

High competition keywords

make

Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
access

Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
help

Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
designed

Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
allows

Total apps: 77,278 • Major competitors: 7,086

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
make	64	100	65	89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	21,922 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	57	85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	9,110 major competitor apps
limited	72	100	52	71 14,801 competing apps Median installs: 42,546 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	1,812 major competitor apps
connect	68	100	63	79 44,719 competing apps Median installs: 25,534 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	4,584 major competitor apps
help	65	100	66	87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	14,840 major competitor apps
special	68	100	58	80 49,271 competing apps Median installs: 42,767 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	6,785 major competitor apps
collected	73	100	47	68 9,686 competing apps Median installs: 25,493 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	688 major competitor apps
access	65	100	67	87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	11,667 major competitor apps
schedule	71	100	53	72 16,410 competing apps Median installs: 21,513 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,332 major competitor apps
track	67	100	57	81 58,055 competing apps Median installs: 25,840 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,673 major competitor apps
interact	72	100	61	67 8,765 competing apps Median installs: 30,335 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,078 major competitor apps
improve	68	100	56	80 46,984 competing apps Median installs: 36,014 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,304 major competitor apps
part	69	100	61	77 31,519 competing apps Median installs: 30,635 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	3,488 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	58	84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	7,086 major competitor apps
feature	68	100	60	79 40,911 competing apps Median installs: 39,110 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,125 major competitor apps
needed	73	100	50	68 9,174 competing apps Median installs: 30,870 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	968 major competitor apps
receive	68	100	57	81 56,666 competing apps Median installs: 28,494 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,489 major competitor apps
user	67	100	60	82 59,325 competing apps Median installs: 25,959 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	4,926 major competitor apps
subject	72	100	49	67 7,805 competing apps Median installs: 30,434 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	764 major competitor apps
routine	72	100	43	62 4,355 competing apps Median installs: 30,512 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	485 major competitor apps
documents	72	100	71	69 10,646 competing apps Median installs: 29,384 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,198 major competitor apps
data	67	100	65	83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,589 major competitor apps
requires	71	100	54	72 15,340 competing apps Median installs: 33,836 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,687 major competitor apps
build	69	100	59	78 34,364 competing apps Median installs: 53,600 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	5,706 major competitor apps

App Description

App for participants in studies of the Apollo Wearable

The Juno app is a special research app that allows study participants to interact with the study-versions of the Apollo wearable and is intended to be used for authorized research and evaluation use only. The app collects limited personally identifiable data and requires a subject ID to access it. Any data collected is described in the study documents you receive and are reviewed and approved by appropriate regulatory agencies, as needed.

The Juno app features:

Simplified subject ID based login and access control

Seven distinct modes of vibratory stimulation designed to help the user reach their goals

Ability to build a custom schedule to make Apollo part of a daily routine and improve adherence to study protocols

Ability to track Apollo usage

Ability to connect to Oura Cloud for biometric data collection, if needed as part of a study

The feature set you may be asked to evaluate or use as part of the study you are participating in will be defined in the study documents (viz., consent, study materials) you receive.