AEA GISE

641 installs
ratings
AEA GISE icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 85 keywords for AEA GISE in Google Play

Developer: Araneum Group srl Italy Category: medical

AEA GISE tracks 85 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 85 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 43.6.

patient antithrombotic therapy elderly acute coronary syndrome gise tolove

Tracked keywords

85

0  ranked •  85  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.9

Top keyword: age

Avg difficulty

43.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • age

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,318

    68.4
  • often

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 755

    68.1
  • practical

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —

    Competitors: 764

    69.3
  • term

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 782

    67.2
  • expert

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,553

    70.2

Unranked opportunities

  • age

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 1,318

  • often

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 755

  • practical

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 764

  • term

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 782

  • expert

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Competitors: 1,553

High competition keywords

  • every

    Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3

  • without

    Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1

  • various

    Total apps: 74,125 • Major competitors: 9,464

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7

  • including

    Total apps: 66,643 • Major competitors: 8,693

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.4

  • provide

    Total apps: 61,536 • Major competitors: 5,453

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
single691005677

32,754 competing apps

Median installs: 37,118

Avg rating: 2.9

3,952

major competitor apps

order681005579

44,242 competing apps

Median installs: 25,117

Avg rating: 2.7

4,188

major competitor apps

management691005277

32,852 competing apps

Median installs: 18,996

Avg rating: 2.5

2,393

major competitor apps

treated691003249

731 competing apps

Median installs: 24,059

Avg rating: 2.7

45

major competitor apps

age731004868

10,050 competing apps

Median installs: 46,004

Avg rating: 2.9

1,318

major competitor apps

provide671005582

61,536 competing apps

Median installs: 28,348

Avg rating: 2.7

5,453

major competitor apps

rate701005075

24,148 competing apps

Median installs: 33,875

Avg rating: 2.7

2,128

major competitor apps

multiple671006282

58,884 competing apps

Median installs: 44,428

Avg rating: 3.0

8,314

major competitor apps

including671006482

66,643 competing apps

Median installs: 40,188

Avg rating: 3.0

8,693

major competitor apps

special681005880

49,271 competing apps

Median installs: 42,767

Avg rating: 3.0

6,785

major competitor apps

various671005883

74,125 competing apps

Median installs: 40,134

Avg rating: 2.8

9,464

major competitor apps

group711006373

19,138 competing apps

Median installs: 24,928

Avg rating: 2.7

1,759

major competitor apps

patients711003960

3,336 competing apps

Median installs: 19,052

Avg rating: 2.6

203

major competitor apps

related701005175

24,302 competing apps

Median installs: 26,107

Avg rating: 2.5

1,820

major competitor apps

patient711003861

3,718 competing apps

Median installs: 18,204

Avg rating: 2.6

190

major competitor apps

practical721004469

11,343 competing apps

Median installs: 21,950

Avg rating: 2.5

764

major competitor apps

presence711004062

4,089 competing apps

Median installs: 24,725

Avg rating: 2.5

288

major competitor apps

develop711005072

15,439 competing apps

Median installs: 38,317

Avg rating: 2.9

1,937

major competitor apps

without651006386

113,596 competing apps

Median installs: 37,274

Avg rating: 2.8

12,654

major competitor apps

every651006287

125,665 competing apps

Median installs: 38,364

Avg rating: 3.0

16,037

major competitor apps

clear691005578

34,357 competing apps

Median installs: 27,922

Avg rating: 2.9

3,323

major competitor apps

term721004567

8,523 competing apps

Median installs: 32,276

Avg rating: 2.7

782

major competitor apps

trials691004050

821 competing apps

Median installs: 51,451

Avg rating: 3.1

125

major competitor apps

expert721005170

12,855 competing apps

Median installs: 38,445

Avg rating: 2.8

1,553

major competitor apps

often731005068

9,688 competing apps

Median installs: 26,970

Avg rating: 2.8

755

major competitor apps

85 keywords
1 of 4

App Description

patient antithrombotic therapy elderly acute coronary syndrome gise tolove

With an aging population in the Western world, a growing proportion of patients treated in praticacardiologica is represented by the elders.
Although about a third of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is older than 75 years and the mortality rate in this age group has doubled compared to younger patients, this population is underrepresented in randomized controlled trials and, therefore, the guidelines often do not provide clear guidance for the management of elderly patients.
Therefore, there is need for clinical guidance regarding this subpopulation dipazienti with SCA growing rapidly, considering the fact claws decisions on the optimal antithrombotic therapy strategies in the elderly are often difficult and complex, also in relation to the presence of dysfunction d ' age-related organ, frequent comorbidity and multiple concomitant medications, and ultimately increase the risk of both ischemic stroke is hemorrhagic in elderly patients.
An expert panel of cardiologists rallied under the aegis of Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) to discuss the issue and develop a consensus document, in order to provide practical recommendations on the clinical cardiologist and interventionist on the optimal management of antithrombotic therapy in ACS patients over the age of 75 years.
In this position paper are presented and discussed various clinical scenarios of patients with acute myocardial infarction with or without elevation trattoST and unstable angina, including special cases (eg. Patients over equal 85anni, patients with kidney disease or with known cerebrovascular accident, patients requiring triple therapy or long-term antithrombotic therapy), providing the Panelper recommendations every single scenario.