AEA GISE
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 85 keywords for AEA GISE in Google Play
AEA GISE tracks 85 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 85 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 43.6.
patient antithrombotic therapy elderly acute coronary syndrome gise tolove
Tracked keywords
85
0 ranked • 85 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: age
Avg difficulty
43.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.4
age
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,318
- 68.1
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 755
- 69.3
practical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 764
- 67.2
term
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 782
- 70.2
expert
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,553
Unranked opportunities
age
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 1,318
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 755
practical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 764
term
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 782
expert
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Competitors: 1,553
High competition keywords
every
Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
various
Total apps: 74,125 • Major competitors: 9,464
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
including
Total apps: 66,643 • Major competitors: 8,693
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.4
provide
Total apps: 61,536 • Major competitors: 5,453
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| single | 69 | 100 | 56 | 77 32,754 competing apps Median installs: 37,118 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,952 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 44,242 competing apps Median installs: 25,117 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,188 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 32,852 competing apps Median installs: 18,996 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,393 major competitor apps |
| treated | 69 | 100 | 32 | 49 731 competing apps Median installs: 24,059 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| age | 73 | 100 | 48 | 68 10,050 competing apps Median installs: 46,004 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,318 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| rate | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 24,148 competing apps Median installs: 33,875 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,128 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 64 | 82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,693 major competitor apps |
| special | 68 | 100 | 58 | 80 49,271 competing apps Median installs: 42,767 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,785 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| group | 71 | 100 | 63 | 73 19,138 competing apps Median installs: 24,928 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,759 major competitor apps |
| patients | 71 | 100 | 39 | 60 3,336 competing apps Median installs: 19,052 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 24,302 competing apps Median installs: 26,107 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,820 major competitor apps |
| patient | 71 | 100 | 38 | 61 3,718 competing apps Median installs: 18,204 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| practical | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 11,343 competing apps Median installs: 21,950 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 764 major competitor apps |
| presence | 71 | 100 | 40 | 62 4,089 competing apps Median installs: 24,725 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 288 major competitor apps |
| develop | 71 | 100 | 50 | 72 15,439 competing apps Median installs: 38,317 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,937 major competitor apps |
| without | 65 | 100 | 63 | 86 113,596 competing apps Median installs: 37,274 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 12,654 major competitor apps |
| every | 65 | 100 | 62 | 87 125,665 competing apps Median installs: 38,364 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,037 major competitor apps |
| clear | 69 | 100 | 55 | 78 34,357 competing apps Median installs: 27,922 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,323 major competitor apps |
| term | 72 | 100 | 45 | 67 8,523 competing apps Median installs: 32,276 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 782 major competitor apps |
| trials | 69 | 100 | 40 | 50 821 competing apps Median installs: 51,451 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 125 major competitor apps |
| expert | 72 | 100 | 51 | 70 12,855 competing apps Median installs: 38,445 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,553 major competitor apps |
| often | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 9,688 competing apps Median installs: 26,970 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 755 major competitor apps |
App Description
patient antithrombotic therapy elderly acute coronary syndrome gise tolove
Although about a third of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is older than 75 years and the mortality rate in this age group has doubled compared to younger patients, this population is underrepresented in randomized controlled trials and, therefore, the guidelines often do not provide clear guidance for the management of elderly patients.
Therefore, there is need for clinical guidance regarding this subpopulation dipazienti with SCA growing rapidly, considering the fact claws decisions on the optimal antithrombotic therapy strategies in the elderly are often difficult and complex, also in relation to the presence of dysfunction d ' age-related organ, frequent comorbidity and multiple concomitant medications, and ultimately increase the risk of both ischemic stroke is hemorrhagic in elderly patients.
An expert panel of cardiologists rallied under the aegis of Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) to discuss the issue and develop a consensus document, in order to provide practical recommendations on the clinical cardiologist and interventionist on the optimal management of antithrombotic therapy in ACS patients over the age of 75 years.
In this position paper are presented and discussed various clinical scenarios of patients with acute myocardial infarction with or without elevation trattoST and unstable angina, including special cases (eg. Patients over equal 85anni, patients with kidney disease or with known cerebrovascular accident, patients requiring triple therapy or long-term antithrombotic therapy), providing the Panelper recommendations every single scenario.
