POST-PCI
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 46 keywords for POST-PCI in Google Play
POST-PCI tracks 46 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 46 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 42.5.
Follow-up of patients undergoing diagnostic coronary revascularization
Tracked keywords
46
0 ranked • 46 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: path
Avg difficulty
42.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.8
path
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,024
- 70.2
medical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 802
- 69.2
identify
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,212
- 68.8
inspired
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 57.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,378
- 66.7
recent
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 72.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 809
Unranked opportunities
path
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Competitors: 1,024
medical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 802
identify
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Competitors: 1,212
inspired
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 57.2 • Competitors: 1,378
recent
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 72.4 • Competitors: 809
High competition keywords
allows
Total apps: 77,278 • Major competitors: 7,086
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
based
Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
important
Total apps: 46,344 • Major competitors: 3,893
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.9
exclusive
Total apps: 34,168 • Major competitors: 4,554
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
created
Total apps: 26,487 • Major competitors: 2,330
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| exclusive | 69 | 100 | 62 | 77 34,168 competing apps Median installs: 36,550 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,554 major competitor apps |
| medical | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 12,810 competing apps Median installs: 23,738 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 51 | 76 26,487 competing apps Median installs: 29,378 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,330 major competitor apps |
| international | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 15,943 competing apps Median installs: 33,008 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,857 major competitor apps |
| ideal | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 20,411 competing apps Median installs: 31,781 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,128 major competitor apps |
| path | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 9,345 competing apps Median installs: 33,245 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,024 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 70 | 100 | 53 | 55 1,622 competing apps Median installs: 19,557 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| patients | 71 | 100 | 39 | 60 3,336 competing apps Median installs: 19,052 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| patient | 71 | 100 | 38 | 61 3,718 competing apps Median installs: 18,204 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 7,086 major competitor apps |
| literature | 70 | 100 | 35 | 56 1,898 competing apps Median installs: 23,216 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
| recognized | 71 | 100 | 43 | 58 2,582 competing apps Median installs: 24,430 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 209 major competitor apps |
| identify | 72 | 100 | 61 | 69 11,226 competing apps Median installs: 31,104 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,212 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 26,003 competing apps Median installs: 32,925 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,321 major competitor apps |
| important | 68 | 100 | 57 | 80 46,344 competing apps Median installs: 27,477 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,893 major competitor apps |
| hospital | 71 | 100 | 41 | 60 3,278 competing apps Median installs: 32,408 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 347 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 63 | 82 67,175 competing apps Median installs: 30,073 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,592 major competitor apps |
| italian | 71 | 100 | 39 | 60 3,236 competing apps Median installs: 26,234 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 280 major competitor apps |
| society | 71 | 100 | 36 | 58 2,374 competing apps Median installs: 16,518 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 116 major competitor apps |
| vary | 71 | 100 | 77 | 62 3,981 competing apps Median installs: 52,727 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 590 major competitor apps |
| inspired | 72 | 100 | 57 | 69 10,622 competing apps Median installs: 35,954 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,378 major competitor apps |
| recent | 72 | 100 | 72 | 67 8,009 competing apps Median installs: 27,095 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 809 major competitor apps |
| association | 71 | 100 | 38 | 59 2,785 competing apps Median installs: 14,012 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 154 major competitor apps |
| statement | 71 | 100 | 42 | 59 2,803 competing apps Median installs: 46,882 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 371 major competitor apps |
| general | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 14,334 competing apps Median installs: 27,289 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,038 major competitor apps |
App Description
Follow-up of patients undergoing diagnostic coronary revascularization
The diagnostic treatment proposed in this app is based on a protocol of follow-up with selective pathways vary according to clinical and angiographic characteristics recognized in the literature as important prognostic factors. This protocol is derived from a Consensus Statement intercompany involving the Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology (GISE), the National Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO), the Italian Society of Cardiac Rehabilitation (GIRC) and the Italian Society of Doctors of Medicine General (SIMMG) and is inspired by the most recent International Guidelines on the subject.
The application created by Roberta Rossini for GISE Lombardy is considered the exclusive use by medical personnel.