Davis Lab and Diagnostic Tests
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 97 keywords for Davis Lab and Diagnostic Tests in Google Play
Davis Lab and Diagnostic Tests tracks 97 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 97 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 43.7.
Comprehensive Laboratory and Diagnostic Tests With Nursing Implications 11th Ed.
Tracked keywords
97
0 ranked • 97 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: normal
Avg difficulty
43.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
normal
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 624
- 63.5
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 185
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 64.4
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 367
- 62.9
units
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 397
Unranked opportunities
normal
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 624
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 185
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 195
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 367
units
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 397
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 280,152 • Major competitors: 10,258
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4
information
Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
allows
Total apps: 178,103 • Major competitors: 5,820
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
complete
Total apps: 168,210 • Major competitors: 8,769
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
unique
Total apps: 167,533 • Major competitors: 11,665
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| focus | 70 | 100 | 52 | 76 59,290 competing apps Median installs: 786 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,834 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 141,210 competing apps Median installs: 494 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,042 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 55,904 competing apps Median installs: 1,282 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,569 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 54 | 76 61,785 competing apps Median installs: 2,244 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,468 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 103,085 competing apps Median installs: 1,287 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,729 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,571 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,101 competing apps Median installs: 2,143 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,302 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,152 competing apps Median installs: 1,245 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 10,258 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 137,173 competing apps Median installs: 1,374 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,451 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,038 competing apps Median installs: 2,121 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,024 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 130,886 competing apps Median installs: 2,588 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,369 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 73 | 100 | 45 | 57 3,825 competing apps Median installs: 1,750 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 113 major competitor apps |
| patients | 74 | 100 | 39 | 64 9,712 competing apps Median installs: 671 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 185 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 96,461 competing apps Median installs: 2,011 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| tests | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,961 competing apps Median installs: 1,590 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 596 major competitor apps |
| tables | 73 | 100 | 40 | 59 5,017 competing apps Median installs: 2,642 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 244 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 168,210 competing apps Median installs: 2,143 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 8,769 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 57,245 competing apps Median installs: 1,508 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,782 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 84,168 competing apps Median installs: 685 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,970 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 57 | 83 165,971 competing apps Median installs: 4,240 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 10,598 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 143,952 competing apps Median installs: 1,681 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 6,411 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,651 competing apps Median installs: 540 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| social | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 119,647 competing apps Median installs: 2,301 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,167 major competitor apps |
| fast | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 131,219 competing apps Median installs: 2,112 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,780 major competitor apps |
| cultural | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 17,323 competing apps Median installs: 859 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 301 major competitor apps |
App Description
Comprehensive Laboratory and Diagnostic Tests With Nursing Implications 11th Ed.
Tests and procedures are listed in alphabetical order by their complete name for quick reference. The search feature allows fast searches by abbreviation, synonym, disease/disorder, specimen type, or test classification.
Key Features
• Fast Find: Lab and Dx—The complete Lab & Diagnostic Test database
• Searchable
• Mobile and tablet friendly
• “Potential Nursing Problems” tables within many studies that present problems, signs and symptoms, and interventions related to the study
• ‘Common Use’ for each study to provide an at-a-glance description of what the test is for, presented in everyday language that patients will understand
• Studies that focus on what you need to do before, during, and after each laboratory and diagnostic test, including…
• Patient Teaching
• Detailed coverage of patient safety
• “Sensitivity to Social and Cultural Issues” and “Nutritional Considerations,” where appropriate
• Diagnostic imaging studies with explanations of the reasons for the test result
• Pathophysiology information that explains why a lab test result is increased or decreased
• Reference Ranges that are expressed in both conventional and SI units (with the SI unit conversion factor) and include age- and gender-specific variations when indicated and normal variations due to cultural considerations
• Interfering Factors, including food, natural products, timing of test, handling of specimen, underlying patient conditions, and drugs that may interfere with the results of the test
• Unique coverage of laboratory and diagnostic tests for subspecialties, such as maternity, therapeutic drug monitoring, nutrition and sensory
