UC Davis BRD Risk

Developer: University of California

Category: Productivity

48 installs

ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 113 keywords for UC Davis BRD Risk in Google Play

Developer: University of California Davis Category: productivity

UC Davis BRD Risk tracks 113 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 113 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.7, difficulty 45.3.

The California (CA) BRD scoring system was developed by researchers

Tracked keywords

113

0 ranked • 113 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.7

Top keyword: upon

Avg difficulty

45.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 753
67.5
random

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,316
68.3
stored

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,026
67.7
side

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,185
68.0
animal

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,425
67.5

Unranked opportunities

upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 753
random

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Competitors: 1,316
stored

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Competitors: 1,026
side

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Competitors: 1,185
animal

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Competitors: 1,425

High competition keywords

best

Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
using

Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
information

Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
us

Total apps: 96,924 • Major competitors: 10,444

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	65	100	63	87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	18,001 major competitor apps
health	70	100	52	75 23,713 competing apps Median installs: 25,526 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,845 major competitor apps
email	69	100	53	77 32,694 competing apps Median installs: 29,240 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,918 major competitor apps
version	69	100	61	77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	3,300 major competitor apps
device	68	100	72	81 52,389 competing apps Median installs: 37,519 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	6,390 major competitor apps
users	67	100	60	82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,026 major competitor apps
language	69	100	59	76 29,667 competing apps Median installs: 31,657 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,542 major competitor apps
contact	67	100	58	82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 30,986 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,729 major competitor apps
information	66	100	59	86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	7,805 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
control	68	100	59	81 56,251 competing apps Median installs: 34,640 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,945 major competitor apps
using	65	100	64	86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	13,323 major competitor apps
option	70	100	53	75 23,307 competing apps Median installs: 32,883 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,446 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
score	71	100	52	72 16,635 competing apps Median installs: 29,493 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,927 major competitor apps
university	72	100	41	64 5,845 competing apps Median installs: 14,036 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	164 major competitor apps
patient	71	100	38	61 3,718 competing apps Median installs: 18,204 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	190 major competitor apps
researchers	69	100	31	48 646 competing apps Median installs: 17,784 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	35 major competitor apps
upon	73	100	44	67 8,881 competing apps Median installs: 28,496 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	753 major competitor apps
culture	72	100	41	64 5,695 competing apps Median installs: 20,931 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	360 major competitor apps
aid	71	100	40	61 3,804 competing apps Median installs: 29,020 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	360 major competitor apps
producer	68	100	37	45 413 competing apps Median installs: 29,694 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	53 major competitor apps
love	67	100	62	82 60,143 competing apps Median installs: 47,097 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	8,442 major competitor apps
following	69	100	58	77 33,448 competing apps Median installs: 32,090 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	3,198 major competitor apps
school	71	100	49	73 19,501 competing apps Median installs: 27,456 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,851 major competitor apps

App Description

The California (CA) BRD scoring system was developed by researchers

The California (CA) BRD scoring system was developed by researchers at the University of California (UC) Davis’s School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Science and UC Agriculture and Natural Resources. This calf-side system relies on the binary classification of significant predictors of BRD in preweaned dairy calves based on a statistical model of over 2000 preweaned dairy calves. The system was also validated using data from over 500 preweaned dairy calves in California.

The app can be used as an aid to the herd veterinarian and producer in the prevention and control of pneumonia in pre-weaned dairy calves under the Veterinary Client Patient Relationship. Calves can be scored to determine their CA BRD score status and results stored in a searchable database on the user’s mobile device.
Users can also estimate the prevalence of BRD in a herd of calves by scoring a random sample of calves that the app identifies upon providing the herd size and the required inputs for a sample size formula or accepting the defaults for a best guess prevalence estimate (25%) and how tight of a 95% confidence interval is desired (10% bound).
Similarly, the Spanish version is accessible once the device language is switched.
Under settings, users can switch between Celsius and Fahrenheit temperature input and elect to email questions and results to the Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, UC Davis if that option is selected.

The CA BRD scoring system for preweaned dairy calves is based on the following research and referenced methods:

1 – Agreement between bovine respiratory disease scoring systems for pre-weaned dairy calves. Aly SS, Love WJ, Williams DR, Lehenbauer TW, Van Eenennaam A, Drake C, Kass PH, Farver TB. Anim Health Res Rev. 2014; 15:148-50.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424381

2 – Development of a novel clinical scoring system for on-farm diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in pre-weaned dairy calves. Love WJ, Lehenbauer TW, Kass PH, Van Eenennaam AL, Aly SS. PeerJ. 2014; 2;2:e238.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24482759

3– Sensitivity and specificity of on-farm scoring systems and nasal culture to detect bovine respiratory disease complex in preweaned dairy calves. Love WJ, Lehenbauer TW, Van Eenennaam AL, Drake CM, Kass PH, Farver TB, Aly SS. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2016; 28:119-28.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26796957

4 - Scheaffer, R. L., W. Mendenhall, and R. L. Ott. 1995. Elementary Survey Sampling. 5th ed. Duxbury Press, Belmont, MA.

For more information contact us at: brd@vmtrc.ucdavis.edu