InspectionScope
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 87 keywords for InspectionScope in Google Play
InspectionScope tracks 87 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 87 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 46.0.
Inspect fiber end-faces via WiFi camera and analyze defects using OpenCV.
Tracked keywords
87
0 ranked • 87 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: faces
Avg difficulty
46.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
faces
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 353
- 65.4
release
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 758
- 64.4
responsive
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 442
- 62.6
initial
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 290
- 63.5
enabled
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 398
Unranked opportunities
faces
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 353
release
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.3 • Competitors: 758
responsive
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 442
initial
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 290
enabled
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 398
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,338 • Major competitors: 16,191
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
mobile
Total apps: 280,792 • Major competitors: 10,253
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
designed
Total apps: 260,960 • Major competitors: 7,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
using
Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
different
Total apps: 187,624 • Major competitors: 13,693
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| video streaming | 71 | 100 | 40 | 50 1,301 competing apps Median installs: 7,052 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 75,078 competing apps Median installs: 1,819 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,979 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 63 | 80 107,978 competing apps Median installs: 2,602 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,164 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 116,161 competing apps Median installs: 1,484 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,252 major competitor apps |
| handle | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 18,072 competing apps Median installs: 1,235 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,002 major competitor apps |
| images | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 72,113 competing apps Median installs: 2,506 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,919 major competitor apps |
| live | 67 | 100 | 57 | 82 143,239 competing apps Median installs: 1,368 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,365 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,960 competing apps Median installs: 723 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,547 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 51 | 76 55,896 competing apps Median installs: 2,636 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,935 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 59 | 83 156,908 competing apps Median installs: 2,697 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 9,506 major competitor apps |
| storage | 72 | 100 | 59 | 70 24,796 competing apps Median installs: 3,098 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,732 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 43,001 competing apps Median installs: 1,428 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,671 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,965 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,263 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,191 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,792 competing apps Median installs: 1,234 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,253 major competitor apps |
| customizable | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 40,926 competing apps Median installs: 1,100 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,084 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,551 competing apps Median installs: 2,326 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 8,222 major competitor apps |
| video | 69 | 100 | 60 | 79 86,295 competing apps Median installs: 3,943 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,110 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 129,573 competing apps Median installs: 2,109 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,950 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 53 | 81 128,193 competing apps Median installs: 867 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,054 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 73 | 100 | 45 | 57 3,862 competing apps Median installs: 1,698 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 96,985 competing apps Median installs: 1,974 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,882 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 183,815 competing apps Median installs: 786 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,710 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 101,554 competing apps Median installs: 1,112 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,592 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 99,541 competing apps Median installs: 1,635 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,467 major competitor apps |
App Description
Inspect fiber end-faces via WiFi camera and analyze defects using OpenCV.
Users can adjust testing parameters to suit different inspection standards, view results in real time, and save high-resolution images for documentation or review. InspectionScope supports multiple device types including phones, tablets, and Chrome OS, and is optimized for field technicians and QA engineers working in fiber deployment and maintenance.
This initial release includes:
– Real-time video streaming from WiFi camera handle
– One-tap defect analysis using OpenCV
– Customizable test parameters
– Image capture and storage
– Clean, responsive UI for mobile and tablet use
InspectionScope helps streamline fiber inspection workflows, reduce manual errors, and improve diagnostic accuracy in the field.