CICT தொல்காப்பியம்: சொல்
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 128 keywords for CICT தொல்காப்பியம்: சொல் in Google Play
CICT தொல்காப்பியம்: சொல் tracks 128 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 128 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.5, difficulty 41.9.
Tolkappiyam Solathikaram Phonetic App - Morphology, Syntax & Semantics
Tracked keywords
128
0 ranked • 128 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.5
Top keyword: presence
Avg difficulty
41.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
presence
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 294
- 63.7
refer
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 370
- 61.8
institute
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 73
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 180
- 62.9
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 421
Unranked opportunities
presence
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 294
refer
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 370
institute
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 73
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 180
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 421
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 326,434 • Major competitors: 20,160
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
best
Total apps: 256,612 • Major competitors: 18,517
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.4
features
Total apps: 255,162 • Major competitors: 15,210
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
share
Total apps: 217,604 • Major competitors: 11,957
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
without
Total apps: 210,878 • Major competitors: 11,400
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 57 | 86 256,612 competing apps Median installs: 3,975 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 18,517 major competitor apps |
| share | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 217,604 competing apps Median installs: 2,916 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 11,957 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 58 | 88 326,434 competing apps Median installs: 2,530 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 20,160 major competitor apps |
| phone | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 152,947 competing apps Median installs: 3,555 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9,505 major competitor apps |
| range | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 90,608 competing apps Median installs: 1,470 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,592 major competitor apps |
| words | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 46,475 competing apps Median installs: 4,876 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,979 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,249 competing apps Median installs: 1,420 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,147 major competitor apps |
| institute | 74 | 100 | 37 | 62 7,607 competing apps Median installs: 583 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 131,738 competing apps Median installs: 2,364 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 6,184 major competitor apps |
| modern | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 79,014 competing apps Median installs: 1,184 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,595 major competitor apps |
| call | 70 | 100 | 54 | 74 47,398 competing apps Median installs: 4,019 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,037 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 129,131 competing apps Median installs: 2,581 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,581 major competitor apps |
| michigan | 70 | 100 | 28 | 44 611 competing apps Median installs: 875 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,221 competing apps Median installs: 1,724 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 180 major competitor apps |
| services | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 104,062 competing apps Median installs: 1,038 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 4,306 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,845 competing apps Median installs: 2,786 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,945 major competitor apps |
| others | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 28,228 competing apps Median installs: 3,152 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,604 major competitor apps |
| series | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 26,500 competing apps Median installs: 6,081 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,964 major competitor apps |
| english | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 46,977 competing apps Median installs: 4,014 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,017 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 170,538 competing apps Median installs: 2,482 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 9,567 major competitor apps |
| contains | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 66,748 competing apps Median installs: 5,003 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,155 major competitor apps |
| cultural | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 17,488 competing apps Median installs: 937 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 326 major competitor apps |
| presence | 75 | 100 | 40 | 64 10,057 competing apps Median installs: 1,418 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 294 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 16,934 competing apps Median installs: 3,151 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 645 major competitor apps |
| without | 66 | 100 | 56 | 85 210,878 competing apps Median installs: 3,576 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 11,400 major competitor apps |
App Description
Tolkappiyam Solathikaram Phonetic App - Morphology, Syntax & Semantics
The first natural words 'claviyakam' refer to serial substitution. It is clearly seen that Tolkappiyar thought that grammar should be given to individual words only after explaining the norms that make up the series, starting with the series. In the Klaviat, he elaborates on linear series and gives the following three properties about differential series. They are Heterogeneous, Heterogeneous Anesthesiology, and Heterogeneity respectively. The following four chapters separately explain the grammatical elements of the four types of Tamil words namely noun, verb, inter, and uri respectively. 'Final lexicalism' deals with grammars that are common to what has been said before, rather than by name.
Tolkāppiyam in Tamil, dated not later than the third century before the advent of the Common Era, is, arguably, the earliest complete work of linguistics in the ancient classical traditions of the world. It is complete in the sense that it encompasses both the written and the spoken languages, and it is a grammar of graphology, phonology, syntax, semantics, poetics, prosody and rhetoric. As such, it marks a sui generis, towering presence without a comparable work in any of the primary classical languages of the world in range and perspective. This apart, Tolkāppiyam contains several concepts and ideas that are futuristic in content and spirit and several others that are pragmatic in character. It also embodies features which are in the nature of pioneering later developments in other languages and literatures, both classical and modern. It is no wonder then that Prof. A.L. Becker of the University of Michigan comments thus: “Tolkāppiyar was someone whose bust they should be putting in American university libraries”. Equally revealing is the observation of Prof. A.K. Ramanujan of the University of Chicago: “He is very close to what you would call a linguistics' ultimate guru”. The Central Institute of Classical Tamil has, therefore, taken upon the translation of Tolkāppiyam into English and other principal languages of the world including the scheduled languages of India among its primary academic projects, first because Tolkāppiyam has a lot to share with the other linguistic traditions. of the world, secondly because it foreshadows several contemporary linguistic and applied linguistic principles, and thirdly because it is crying to be placed among the finest and the best of the books of the world. Again, Tolkāppiyar's insights into cultural linguistics, lexicography, semantics, case system, TG Grammar and so forth are capable of being juxtaposed with modern conceptualizations in these spheres of scholarship.
Important Phone setup
Text-to-speech output
Preferred engine Speech services by Google
Language Tamil (India)
