Chickeen Road
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 114 keywords for Chickeen Road in Google Play
Chickeen Road tracks 114 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 114 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.3, difficulty 47.8.
Strategic tile-merging challenge on a dynamic 4×4 board.
Tracked keywords
114
0 ranked • 114 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: becomes
Avg difficulty
47.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.7
becomes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 954
- 68.4
rules
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,327
- 70.1
board
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,560
- 65.0
merge
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 53.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,141
- 71.3
limited
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,812
Unranked opportunities
becomes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 954
rules
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Competitors: 1,327
board
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Competitors: 1,560
merge
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 53.4 • Competitors: 1,141
limited
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Competitors: 1,812
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
every
Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3
experience
Total apps: 118,077 • Major competitors: 15,561
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.8
create
Total apps: 93,845 • Major competitors: 13,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 69.1
allows
Total apps: 77,278 • Major competitors: 7,086
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| action | 71 | 100 | 64 | 73 19,490 competing apps Median installs: 64,156 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,588 major competitor apps |
| board | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 12,703 competing apps Median installs: 36,549 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,560 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,860 competing apps Median installs: 42,032 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,533 major competitor apps |
| challenge | 69 | 100 | 58 | 77 34,053 competing apps Median installs: 50,836 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 5,578 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 118,077 competing apps Median installs: 39,819 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 15,561 major competitor apps |
| merge | 72 | 100 | 53 | 65 6,331 competing apps Median installs: 56,228 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 1,141 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 45,953 competing apps Median installs: 29,549 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,617 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 56,251 competing apps Median installs: 34,640 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,945 major competitor apps |
| limited | 72 | 100 | 52 | 71 14,801 competing apps Median installs: 42,546 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,812 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 64 | 71 15,037 competing apps Median installs: 30,161 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,552 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| move | 70 | 100 | 59 | 75 25,275 competing apps Median installs: 43,577 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,641 major competitor apps |
| dynamic | 71 | 100 | 54 | 73 18,485 competing apps Median installs: 37,329 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,447 major competitor apps |
| effective | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 14,246 competing apps Median installs: 26,024 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,180 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 16,594 competing apps Median installs: 15,694 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,185 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 68 | 80 47,754 competing apps Median installs: 40,524 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,815 major competitor apps |
| structured | 71 | 100 | 38 | 60 3,208 competing apps Median installs: 20,618 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 198 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 69 | 85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 13,574 major competitor apps |
| moves | 72 | 100 | 54 | 65 6,488 competing apps Median installs: 43,496 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 993 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,669 competing apps Median installs: 50,678 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,748 major competitor apps |
| strategic | 72 | 100 | 49 | 70 12,011 competing apps Median installs: 40,962 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,652 major competitor apps |
| ensures | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 17,651 competing apps Median installs: 30,658 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,038 major competitor apps |
| players | 69 | 100 | 58 | 77 34,244 competing apps Median installs: 55,055 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 5,693 major competitor apps |
| develop | 71 | 100 | 50 | 72 15,439 competing apps Median installs: 38,317 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,937 major competitor apps |
App Description
Strategic tile-merging challenge on a dynamic 4×4 board.
The progression of Chickeen Road focuses on controlled expansion within limited space. Each decision affects the shape of future combinations, requiring the player to assess risks and anticipate consequences several moves ahead. The structure of the board allows for multiple approaches: building long value chains, preserving open paths for movement, or focusing on compact, efficient formations. Careful positioning becomes essential, as the game ends once no valid moves remain.
A core element of the experience is the pursuit of larger tile values, culminating in reaching 2048 or maximizing the score. Each merge contributes to the final result, which is recorded at the end of a session. This creates a loop of gradual improvement, encouraging players to refine their strategies, analyze previous attempts, and develop more effective methods of tile coordination.
Chickeen Road emphasizes clarity, balance, and thoughtful decision-making. The predictable rules create a stable foundation, while the constant arrival of new tiles ensures variability across sessions. The player’s objective is to maintain control over expanding numbers and preserve mobility on the board for as long as possible. The result is a focused and methodical experience built around planning, adaptation, and mastering spatial constraints.
