AppGoblinHigh Potential Risk Management
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 79 keywords for High Potential Risk Management in Google Play
High Potential Risk Management tracks 79 keywords (2 keywords rank; 77 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.8, difficulty 48.1, best rank 16.
HiPo is a software platform supporting risk management apps provided by DNV GL.
Tracked keywords
79
2 ranked • 77 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 16 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: human
Avg difficulty
48.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.0
human
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 717
- 68.1
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 737
- 68.8
potential
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank 114
Competitors: 1,050
- 68.8
potential
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank 16
Competitors: 1,050
- 70.1
board
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,560
Unranked opportunities
human
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 717
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 737
board
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Competitors: 1,560
software
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 55.1 • Competitors: 1,054
applied
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 470
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 150,415 • Major competitors: 21,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.5
experience
Total apps: 118,077 • Major competitors: 15,561
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.8
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
available
Total apps: 92,463 • Major competitors: 9,952
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.4
based
Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| potential | 72 | 100 | 48 | 69 10,688 competing apps Median installs: 27,318 Avg rating: 2.9 | 114 | 16 | 1,050 major competitor apps |
| potential | 72 | 100 | 48 | 69 10,688 competing apps Median installs: 27,318 Avg rating: 2.9 | 16 | 16 | 1,050 major competitor apps |
| board | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 12,703 competing apps Median installs: 36,549 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,560 major competitor apps |
| software | 72 | 100 | 55 | 70 13,182 competing apps Median installs: 24,654 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,054 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 31,345 competing apps Median installs: 35,708 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,571 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 37,225 competing apps Median installs: 32,979 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,354 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 118,077 competing apps Median installs: 39,819 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 15,561 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 64,313 competing apps Median installs: 33,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,746 major competitor apps |
| events | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 26,075 competing apps Median installs: 21,064 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,499 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 32,852 competing apps Median installs: 18,996 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,393 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,843 competing apps Median installs: 26,049 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| technique | 70 | 100 | 35 | 55 1,653 competing apps Median installs: 32,169 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 145 major competitor apps |
| tools | 69 | 100 | 62 | 76 29,774 competing apps Median installs: 35,852 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,872 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,778 competing apps Median installs: 31,412 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,617 major competitor apps |
| suitable | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 20,163 competing apps Median installs: 33,595 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,141 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 68 | 88 150,415 competing apps Median installs: 46,503 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,531 major competitor apps |
| applied | 72 | 100 | 46 | 64 5,675 competing apps Median installs: 30,682 Avg rating: 3.4 | — | — | 470 major competitor apps |
| tablet | 72 | 100 | 66 | 71 13,402 competing apps Median installs: 35,189 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,478 major competitor apps |
| identify | 72 | 100 | 61 | 69 11,226 competing apps Median installs: 31,104 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,212 major competitor apps |
| root | 71 | 100 | 44 | 58 2,401 competing apps Median installs: 69,366 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 409 major competitor apps |
| provided | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 23,750 competing apps Median installs: 29,607 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,862 major competitor apps |
| long | 70 | 100 | 57 | 76 27,835 competing apps Median installs: 36,639 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,307 major competitor apps |
| global | 71 | 100 | 59 | 74 20,081 competing apps Median installs: 42,215 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,796 major competitor apps |
App Description
HiPo is a software platform supporting risk management apps provided by DNV GL.
SYSTEMATIC CAUSE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE (SCAT)
Systematic Cause Analysis Technique which helps you and your organisation learn from accidents and other high potential events to prevent further human injury, environmental damage, quality and other losses. Events with high potential for loss need to be assessed using root cause analysis and improvement actions identified, so these events are not repeated. The app incorporates 50 years of experience in incident investigation with step-by-step instructions and tried and tested analysis tools available in 30 languages.
MARINE SYSTEMATIC CAUSE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE (MSCAT)
Marine Systematic Cause Analysis Technique helps you and your shipping organisation learn from accidents and other high potential events on board ships. It is based on the long established SCAT system but adapted to marine accidents and incidents.
BARRIER-BASED SYSTEMATIC CAUSE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE (BSCAT)
BSCAT is a root cause analysis method suitable for more complex process safety accidents like fires and explosions. The accident first assessed to determine all the barriers that failed contributing to the accident. The SCAT method this then applied to each failed barrier to identify the underlying management system failures.