Field Service Management(FSM)

Developer: Epicor Software Corporation

Category: Business

Add App to Comparison

527 installs

Ratings not yet available

63 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +4.00

Declining

Monthly +17

Declining

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 51 keywords for Field Service Management(FSM) in Google Play

Developer: Epicor Software Corporation Category: business

Field Service Management(FSM) tracks 51 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 51 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 44.8.

Epicor Field Service Management Mobile FSM

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 51 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.2

Top keyword: completion

Avg difficulty

44.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

completion

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 156
61.1
performing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 354
60.9
assigned

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 181
62.6
processes

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 187
64.2
equipment

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 982
68.3

Unranked opportunities

completion

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Competitors: 156
performing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 354
assigned

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 181
processes

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 187
equipment

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Competitors: 982

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 280,780 • Major competitors: 10,258

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
using

Total apps: 222,015 • Major competitors: 10,980

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
view

Total apps: 183,814 • Major competitors: 5,712

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
based

Total apps: 152,123 • Major competitors: 5,367

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
user

Total apps: 144,493 • Major competitors: 5,148

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
follow	69	100	53	78 82,706 competing apps Median installs: 1,488 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,124 major competitor apps
software	71	100	49	72 31,509 competing apps Median installs: 1,379 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,040 major competitor apps
users	67	100	54	82 136,108 competing apps Median installs: 1,208 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,826 major competitor apps
management	68	100	50	80 111,279 competing apps Median installs: 491 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	2,437 major competitor apps
working	70	100	51	74 43,002 competing apps Median installs: 1,430 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,671 major competitor apps
using	66	100	58	85 222,015 competing apps Median installs: 2,293 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	10,980 major competitor apps
service	67	100	55	82 134,154 competing apps Median installs: 1,200 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,363 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	56	87 280,780 competing apps Median installs: 1,235 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	10,258 major competitor apps
update	70	100	57	75 52,159 competing apps Median installs: 1,381 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,407 major competitor apps
validation	72	100	33	53 2,267 competing apps Median installs: 802 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	46 major competitor apps
view	66	100	56	84 183,814 competing apps Median installs: 786 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,712 major competitor apps
open	68	100	56	79 96,321 competing apps Median installs: 3,208 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	6,631 major competitor apps
business	68	100	51	79 92,160 competing apps Median installs: 642 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	2,873 major competitor apps
work	68	100	56	81 122,002 competing apps Median installs: 1,547 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,895 major competitor apps
map	71	100	51	74 41,712 competing apps Median installs: 2,691 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	2,370 major competitor apps
location	69	100	54	77 69,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,302 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,982 major competitor apps
user	67	100	56	82 144,493 competing apps Median installs: 1,565 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,148 major competitor apps
solution	69	100	48	78 78,709 competing apps Median installs: 762 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	1,743 major competitor apps
documents	72	100	53	70 26,261 competing apps Median installs: 854 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	964 major competitor apps
field	72	100	44	71 28,202 competing apps Median installs: 996 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	645 major competitor apps
based	67	100	56	83 152,123 competing apps Median installs: 1,246 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,367 major competitor apps
report	71	100	46	72 35,210 competing apps Median installs: 1,115 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,058 major competitor apps
completion	74	100	38	61 6,863 competing apps Median installs: 501 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	156 major competitor apps
upload	71	100	54	73 35,967 competing apps Median installs: 1,448 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,592 major competitor apps
custom	69	100	58	76 62,307 competing apps Median installs: 1,564 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	3,515 major competitor apps

App Description

Epicor Field Service Management Mobile FSM

Epicor Field Service Management (FSM) is an end-to-end cloud-based field service software solution that automates business processes in the office and in the field. Epicor FSM Mobile app users require Field Service Management user licenses.
Designed as an offline-first app, FSM Mobile supports service technicians working in the field. Technicians can view their assigned open service reports, including:
• Summary
• Work Location and map integration
• Contact details
• Project information
• Symptoms
While performing field service, using FSM Mobile a technician can:
• Select and follow configurable service checklists
• Take pictures and upload documents against the service report
• Record parts and labor against the equipment being serviced
• View and update custom service report fields
• Report service issue resolution
• Capture signatures and work completion validation