Taxonomía de Plantas Matsés
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 59 keywords for Taxonomía de Plantas Matsés in Google Play
Taxonomía de Plantas Matsés tracks 59 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 59 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.6, difficulty 43.6.
Taxonomy of Matsés plants illustrated with names in Matsés and regional dialect
Tracked keywords
59
0 ranked • 59 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.6
Top keyword: artist
Avg difficulty
43.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.2
artist
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 55.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 561
- 60.4
plant
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 295
- 60.1
sophisticated
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 270
- 62.0
men
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 524
- 62.8
recognize
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 57.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 449
Unranked opportunities
artist
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 55.5 • Competitors: 561
plant
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 295
sophisticated
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 270
men
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 524
recognize
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 57.7 • Competitors: 449
High competition keywords
features
Total apps: 253,887 • Major competitors: 13,784
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.3
based
Total apps: 152,098 • Major competitors: 5,361
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
including
Total apps: 129,573 • Major competitors: 6,950
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
high
Total apps: 108,460 • Major competitors: 6,461
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
first
Total apps: 105,932 • Major competitors: 4,952
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| page | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 28,299 competing apps Median installs: 2,819 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,479 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 103,569 competing apps Median installs: 2,224 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,286 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,012 competing apps Median installs: 2,136 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,289 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 36,002 competing apps Median installs: 1,324 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,409 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 129,573 competing apps Median installs: 2,109 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,950 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 73 | 100 | 45 | 57 3,862 competing apps Median installs: 1,698 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| knowledge | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 59,748 competing apps Median installs: 1,119 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,263 major competitor apps |
| useful | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 53,446 competing apps Median installs: 2,940 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,424 major competitor apps |
| incredible | 73 | 100 | 52 | 66 14,689 competing apps Median installs: 6,162 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,528 major competitor apps |
| features | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 253,887 competing apps Median installs: 2,163 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 13,784 major competitor apps |
| provided | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 46,281 competing apps Median installs: 2,014 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,450 major competitor apps |
| artist | 74 | 100 | 56 | 64 10,765 competing apps Median installs: 3,734 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 561 major competitor apps |
| present | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 26,438 competing apps Median installs: 2,626 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 916 major competitor apps |
| main | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 68,493 competing apps Median installs: 2,338 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,233 major competitor apps |
| field | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 28,203 competing apps Median installs: 996 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 645 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 152,098 competing apps Median installs: 1,244 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,361 major competitor apps |
| helpful | 73 | 100 | 61 | 68 19,725 competing apps Median installs: 3,101 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,060 major competitor apps |
| research | 73 | 100 | 48 | 67 16,394 competing apps Median installs: 1,495 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 583 major competitor apps |
| along | 71 | 100 | 50 | 74 42,109 competing apps Median installs: 2,073 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,234 major competitor apps |
| plant | 74 | 100 | 43 | 60 6,195 competing apps Median installs: 1,736 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 295 major competitor apps |
| taken | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 16,019 competing apps Median installs: 2,131 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| categories | 71 | 100 | 47 | 71 30,281 competing apps Median installs: 1,920 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,266 major competitor apps |
| since | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 25,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,764 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 826 major competitor apps |
| first | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 105,932 competing apps Median installs: 2,460 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,952 major competitor apps |
| high | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 108,460 competing apps Median installs: 3,213 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,461 major competitor apps |
App Description
Taxonomy of Matsés plants illustrated with names in Matsés and regional dialect
This 122-page application is the first of its kind. It illustrates the amazingly high plant diversity found Western Amazonia along with the sophisticated traditional plant knowledge of the Matses people with drawings of 361 species of plants drawn by Matsés artist Guillermo Nëcca Pëmen Mënquë. The plants illustrated include trees, lianas, palms, understory shrubs, epiphytes, herbs and cultivated plants. It illustrates plants in all the major categories of plants present in the Matsés territory, including angiosperms (dicotyledons and monocotyledons), gymnosperms, ferns, and mosses. 101 plant families are represented. For most species, drawings of fruits, flowers and / or other diagnostic features helpful for recognizing the species are provided. Drawings are based primarily on photographs taken in the field while accompanied by Matsés elders and identified by Dr. David w. Fleck, biologist and linguist who has been living with the Matses and conducting biological, linguistic, ethnographic, and ethnobiological research with them since 1994.
