MUST

Developer: ETT S.p.A.

Category: Travel & Local

302 installs

ratings

+7 weekly installs

trend steady

+22 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 63 keywords for MUST in Google Play

Developer: ETT S.p.A. Category: travel_and_local

MUST tracks 63 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 62 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.9, difficulty 47.8, best rank 2.

MUST is an App for reporting failures of the built system.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 62 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

100%

Best rank 2 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.9

Top keyword: side

Avg difficulty

47.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

side

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,185
68.0
interact

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 60.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,078
67.4
area

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,388
70.8
project

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 506
66.0
waste

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 428
62.8

Unranked opportunities

side

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Competitors: 1,185
interact

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 60.8 • Competitors: 1,078
area

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.1 • Competitors: 1,388
project

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 506
waste

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 428

High competition keywords

different

Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
way

Total apps: 89,339 • Major competitors: 10,854

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.0
real

Total apps: 74,834 • Major competitors: 11,689

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
support

Total apps: 68,575 • Major competitors: 7,371

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
users

Total apps: 59,104 • Major competitors: 6,026

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
must	69	100	52	77 31,973 competing apps Median installs: 36,460 Avg rating: 2.9	2	2	3,575 major competitor apps
support	67	100	60	83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	7,371 major competitor apps
users	67	100	60	82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,026 major competitor apps
management	69	100	52	77 32,852 competing apps Median installs: 18,996 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	2,393 major competitor apps
control	68	100	59	81 56,251 competing apps Median installs: 34,640 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,945 major competitor apps
needs	70	100	52	75 24,331 competing apps Median installs: 30,717 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,732 major competitor apps
way	66	100	61	85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	10,854 major competitor apps
built	71	100	64	71 15,037 competing apps Median installs: 30,161 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,552 major competitor apps
service	68	100	59	81 54,184 competing apps Median installs: 29,877 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	5,377 major competitor apps
monitor	71	100	48	73 19,087 competing apps Median installs: 23,470 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,617 major competitor apps
interact	72	100	61	67 8,765 competing apps Median installs: 30,335 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,078 major competitor apps
area	72	100	54	71 13,871 competing apps Median installs: 28,178 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,388 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	53	78 38,943 competing apps Median installs: 28,037 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,793 major competitor apps
improve	68	100	56	80 46,984 competing apps Median installs: 36,014 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,304 major competitor apps
real	67	100	64	83 74,834 competing apps Median installs: 53,568 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	11,689 major competitor apps
performance	70	100	50	74 20,995 competing apps Median installs: 19,402 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,705 major competitor apps
meet	70	100	65	75 24,878 competing apps Median installs: 46,672 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,573 major competitor apps
por	67	100	49	38 173 competing apps Median installs: 30,868 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	38 major competitor apps
project	72	100	45	66 7,329 competing apps Median installs: 21,428 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	506 major competitor apps
detected	70	100	56	52 1,083 competing apps Median installs: 47,914 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	146 major competitor apps
different	66	100	62	85 100,748 competing apps Median installs: 49,942 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	14,575 major competitor apps
waste	72	100	42	63 4,758 competing apps Median installs: 25,012 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	428 major competitor apps
maintenance	72	100	39	62 4,305 competing apps Median installs: 16,270 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	274 major competitor apps
faults	68	100	26	42 287 competing apps Median installs: 22,693 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	16 major competitor apps
alert	72	100	47	65 6,260 competing apps Median installs: 33,700 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	689 major competitor apps

App Description

MUST is an App for reporting failures of the built system.

The Maintenance Urban Sharing Tool (MUST) App is a participatory service for maintenance and management of the built heritage. The aim is to support on the one side the users in identifying faults and anomalies in their neighborhood/building, on the other side the area manager to have a constantly updated database of faults processes. Moreover, the alert received by MUST helps the operator to improve the scheduling of inspections and interventions, avoiding the waste of resources.
Users can report failures and performance anomalies detected on building facades, different urban systems, and urban furniture elements. In this way they are able to reach, in real time, the maintenance service manager and interact with technicians.
Use of MUST enables the area manager to monitor the evolution of failure processes, and thus control the state of conservation of the asset. Moreover, he can efficiently and promptly reschedule inspections and interventions, and in this way meet the needs expressed by users.
MUST is a project co-funded by POR FESR 2014-2021 Regione Campania, Priority Axis 1 ""Research and Innovation"" funds.