EXFO PON FMT
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 97 keywords for EXFO PON FMT in Google Play
EXFO PON FMT tracks 97 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 97 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 43.2.
EX1 GPON tester compliant with ZTV-43 PON-FMT
Tracked keywords
97
0 ranked • 97 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: difference
Avg difficulty
43.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.6
difference
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 478
- 64.5
loss
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 645
- 63.8
automated
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 284
- 64.0
certified
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 476
- 59.7
performed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 159
Unranked opportunities
difference
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 478
loss
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 645
automated
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 284
certified
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 476
performed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 159
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 282,619 • Major competitors: 11,197
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
designed
Total apps: 259,645 • Major competitors: 8,467
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
unique
Total apps: 169,864 • Major competitors: 12,825
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
phone
Total apps: 153,671 • Major competitors: 9,548
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.5
receive
Total apps: 143,747 • Major competitors: 4,675
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| level | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 111,266 competing apps Median installs: 2,227 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,018 major competitor apps |
| challenging | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 55,228 competing apps Median installs: 5,012 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,212 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 109,194 competing apps Median installs: 3,345 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 6,851 major competitor apps |
| phone | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 153,671 competing apps Median installs: 3,558 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9,548 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 115,591 competing apps Median installs: 1,831 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,539 major competitor apps |
| place | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 101,024 competing apps Median installs: 1,106 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,587 major competitor apps |
| contact | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 139,493 competing apps Median installs: 1,836 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6,378 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 102,272 competing apps Median installs: 1,538 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,028 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 259,645 competing apps Median installs: 855 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,467 major competitor apps |
| immediately | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,154 competing apps Median installs: 3,330 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 977 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 282,619 competing apps Median installs: 1,469 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 11,197 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 118,669 competing apps Median installs: 859 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,615 major competitor apps |
| special | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 109,583 competing apps Median installs: 2,472 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 7,125 major competitor apps |
| operation | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,561 competing apps Median installs: 2,531 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 754 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 127,533 competing apps Median installs: 1,022 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,416 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 98,340 competing apps Median installs: 2,182 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,385 major competitor apps |
| tests | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,787 competing apps Median installs: 1,859 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 643 major competitor apps |
| smart | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 125,112 competing apps Median installs: 1,772 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6,562 major competitor apps |
| power | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 68,314 competing apps Median installs: 2,304 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,158 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 122,962 competing apps Median installs: 1,904 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,315 major competitor apps |
| course | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 31,929 competing apps Median installs: 1,610 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 854 major competitor apps |
| receive | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 143,747 competing apps Median installs: 943 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,675 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 53 | 73 41,435 competing apps Median installs: 4,066 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 2,395 major competitor apps |
| full | 67 | 100 | 54 | 81 128,982 competing apps Median installs: 3,250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,476 major competitor apps |
| tasks | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 29,427 competing apps Median installs: 1,442 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,596 major competitor apps |
App Description
EX1 GPON tester compliant with ZTV-43 PON-FMT
This automated test and measurement procedure tests for permutation up to the OLT and Insertion loss measurement (OLT to Gf - AP), within the framework of NVt - Bvh (Vzk), which can only be performed after the OLT is connected.
- With the PON-FMT application and the EX1, acceptance measurement of the insertion loss is measured at the wavelength 1490 nm.
- The insertion loss is calculated from the difference in level between the transmit level of the OLT port (SFP module) and the receive level at the OneBox.
- In addition, the OLT port is identified by means of the PON ID (PON Identifier according to ITU-T G.984.3).
- The acceptance measurement takes place in the course of Gf - AP assembly. Immediately after the assembly of the Gf - AP is the same operation the PON-FMT is performed with a special level receiver.
The EX1 test solution does not need a screen; all manipulations are handled via the ultra-intuitive PON FMT application running on the field technician’s mobile smart device. All the required tasks are performed through this application: connection, setup and report generation.
The EX1 uses Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) technology which enables untethered testing capabilities – connecting directly to a smart phone or tablet. With its unique BLE capability, field technicians can be up to 100 ft. away from the EX1 tester, and not confined to challenging or harsh testing environments. EXFO’s EX1 takes full advantage of BLE by extending battery time, in turn allowing technicians to test more during their typical work day.
*All GPON testing requires an EXFO certified SFP GPON ONT stick, contact your EXFO representative for more details on this.
