RudPro
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 53 keywords for RudPro in Google Play
RudPro tracks 53 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 53 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 46.6.
This is a stock growth quality analysis application.
Tracked keywords
53
0 ranked • 53 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: competitive
Avg difficulty
46.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.8
competitive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,091
- 68.7
cost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 980
- 67.8
viewing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,146
- 68.1
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 737
- 68.3
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 830
Unranked opportunities
competitive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 1,091
cost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 980
viewing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 1,146
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 737
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Competitors: 830
High competition keywords
whether
Total apps: 76,585 • Major competitors: 8,596
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
provides
Total apps: 71,787 • Major competitors: 6,088
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
including
Total apps: 66,643 • Major competitors: 8,693
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.4
quality
Total apps: 61,778 • Major competitors: 6,617
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.8
users
Total apps: 59,104 • Major competitors: 6,026
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| competitive | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 9,306 competing apps Median installs: 32,378 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,091 major competitor apps |
| health | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 23,713 competing apps Median installs: 25,526 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,845 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,596 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 31,345 competing apps Median installs: 35,708 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,571 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 57 | 79 40,681 competing apps Median installs: 35,653 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,828 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 64 | 82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,693 major competitor apps |
| helping | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 14,477 competing apps Median installs: 28,866 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,392 major competitor apps |
| cash | 72 | 100 | 51 | 71 14,479 competing apps Median installs: 51,664 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,206 major competitor apps |
| financial | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 18,632 competing apps Median installs: 30,680 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,790 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 27,977 competing apps Median installs: 22,814 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,001 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,088 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,778 competing apps Median installs: 31,412 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,617 major competitor apps |
| network | 70 | 100 | 56 | 75 24,379 competing apps Median installs: 36,741 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,898 major competitor apps |
| trend | 71 | 100 | 75 | 59 2,691 competing apps Median installs: 41,102 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 332 major competitor apps |
| statistical | 70 | 100 | 33 | 53 1,215 competing apps Median installs: 23,310 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 75 major competitor apps |
| identify | 72 | 100 | 61 | 69 11,226 competing apps Median installs: 31,104 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,212 major competitor apps |
| cost | 73 | 100 | 48 | 69 10,513 competing apps Median installs: 29,271 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 980 major competitor apps |
| historical | 72 | 100 | 44 | 65 6,493 competing apps Median installs: 22,508 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 511 major competitor apps |
| brand | 72 | 100 | 52 | 71 13,743 competing apps Median installs: 53,257 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,021 major competitor apps |
| growth | 72 | 100 | 42 | 65 6,526 competing apps Median installs: 26,706 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| records | 72 | 100 | 45 | 66 7,385 competing apps Median installs: 26,103 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 628 major competitor apps |
| values | 72 | 100 | 41 | 65 6,209 competing apps Median installs: 23,707 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 428 major competitor apps |
| stock | 72 | 100 | 45 | 67 8,084 competing apps Median installs: 28,216 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 793 major competitor apps |
| viewing | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 9,285 competing apps Median installs: 39,321 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,146 major competitor apps |
App Description
This is a stock growth quality analysis application.
Main Features:
1. After users input a stock name, the app conducts a three-step analysis: competitive moat (brand power, cost advantage, network effects, switching costs), financial health (revenue growth, profit margin, debt ratio, cash flow, ROE), and growth quality (consistency, organic growth, sustainability). After comprehensive calculation, it determines whether the growth is "genuine" or "questionable" and generates trend prediction charts and conclusions.
2. The app saves all analysis records and provides historical viewing and statistical analysis, including growth quality distribution, trend changes, and average values of key metrics, helping users identify quality stocks with sustainable competitive advantages and healthy financial conditions, avoiding the risks of false growth.