WILCO

Developer: Flexapp.com

Category: Tools

340 installs

ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 33 keywords for WILCO in Google Play

Developer: Flexapp.com Category: tools

WILCO tracks 33 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 33 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 51.3.

Quality service meets technology.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 33 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.0

Top keyword: task

Avg difficulty

51.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

task

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 61.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,156
67.6
orders

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 900
68.0
field

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 677
68.7
navigation

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 58.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,141
70.1
managed

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 385
62.7

Unranked opportunities

task

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 61.2 • Competitors: 1,156
orders

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.3 • Competitors: 900
field

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
navigation

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 58.5 • Competitors: 1,141
managed

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 385

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
many

Total apps: 96,753 • Major competitors: 12,574

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.9
quality

Total apps: 61,778 • Major competitors: 6,617

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.8
receive

Total apps: 56,666 • Major competitors: 5,489

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
offline

Total apps: 54,787 • Major competitors: 6,486

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
offline	68	100	60	81 54,787 competing apps Median installs: 36,532 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,486 major competitor apps
navigation	72	100	58	70 12,601 competing apps Median installs: 27,732 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,141 major competitor apps
single	69	100	56	77 32,754 competing apps Median installs: 37,118 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,952 major competitor apps
via	68	100	58	81 54,601 competing apps Median installs: 29,805 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	5,243 major competitor apps
images	69	100	59	78 37,077 competing apps Median installs: 30,933 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,614 major competitor apps
service	68	100	59	81 54,184 competing apps Median installs: 29,877 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	5,377 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
task	73	100	61	68 9,006 competing apps Median installs: 39,110 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,156 major competitor apps
managed	72	100	43	63 4,652 competing apps Median installs: 25,508 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	385 major competitor apps
many	66	100	62	85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	12,574 major competitor apps
quality	67	100	61	82 61,778 competing apps Median installs: 31,412 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,617 major competitor apps
work	68	100	61	81 52,752 competing apps Median installs: 28,708 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,048 major competitor apps
devices	70	100	67	75 25,598 competing apps Median installs: 36,807 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	3,146 major competitor apps
orders	73	100	49	68 9,512 competing apps Median installs: 20,958 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	900 major competitor apps
receive	68	100	57	81 56,666 competing apps Median installs: 28,494 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,489 major competitor apps
field	73	100	45	69 10,538 competing apps Median installs: 19,519 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	677 major competitor apps
teams	72	100	64	65 6,297 competing apps Median installs: 31,734 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	734 major competitor apps
developed	70	100	48	74 21,997 competing apps Median installs: 22,751 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,467 major competitor apps
mobile devices	71	100	62	59 2,850 competing apps Median installs: 25,560 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	249 major competitor apps
transmit	70	100	49	52 1,161 competing apps Median installs: 21,429 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	110 major competitor apps
ability	70	100	51	75 25,091 competing apps Median installs: 29,517 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,202 major competitor apps
combined	72	100	46	63 4,658 competing apps Median installs: 36,939 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	523 major competitor apps
central	72	100	41	64 5,571 competing apps Median installs: 21,486 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	387 major competitor apps
assigned	71	100	41	58 2,576 competing apps Median installs: 19,084 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	210 major competitor apps
common	72	100	47	70 12,930 competing apps Median installs: 28,132 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	999 major competitor apps

App Description

Quality service meets technology.

With our mobile application developed for the use of all field teams, all processes in the field can be managed automatically. Teams who receive their task orders via mobile devices can transmit their work and images to the central system.

Jobs assigned to the person
Getting and completing work from the common pool
Reserve personnel entry
Automatic navigation to the work location
We combined the ability to work offline and many more technologies in a single application.