Intavia
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 100 keywords for Intavia in Google Play
Intavia tracks 100 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 100 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 48.3.
In/Tangible European Heritage
Tracked keywords
100
0 ranked • 100 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: excellent
Avg difficulty
48.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.7
excellent
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,176
- 68.2
interested
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 909
- 68.2
draw
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,624
- 68.5
existing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 926
- 68.5
organized
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 763
Unranked opportunities
excellent
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 1,176
interested
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 909
draw
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 1,624
existing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.0 • Competitors: 926
organized
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Competitors: 763
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
help
Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
information
Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
online
Total apps: 80,029 • Major competitors: 9,770
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| online | 66 | 100 | 61 | 84 80,029 competing apps Median installs: 33,297 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,770 major competitor apps |
| action | 71 | 100 | 64 | 73 19,490 competing apps Median installs: 64,156 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,588 major competitor apps |
| communication | 71 | 100 | 52 | 73 17,694 competing apps Median installs: 18,826 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,191 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 57 | 79 39,640 competing apps Median installs: 36,260 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,807 major competitor apps |
| environment | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 14,040 competing apps Median installs: 47,768 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,983 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 37,225 competing apps Median installs: 32,979 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,354 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 45,953 competing apps Median installs: 29,549 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,617 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 42,168 competing apps Median installs: 26,988 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,209 major competitor apps |
| innovation | 71 | 100 | 37 | 57 2,237 competing apps Median installs: 19,792 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 171 major competitor apps |
| scientists | 69 | 100 | 34 | 47 580 competing apps Median installs: 26,946 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 34,741 competing apps Median installs: 33,606 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,020 major competitor apps |
| call | 70 | 100 | 64 | 76 26,309 competing apps Median installs: 41,916 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,361 major competitor apps |
| excellent | 73 | 100 | 47 | 69 10,547 competing apps Median installs: 34,859 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,176 major competitor apps |
| wide range | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 18,925 competing apps Median installs: 33,783 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,261 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 66 | 87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,840 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| combination | 72 | 100 | 49 | 66 7,537 competing apps Median installs: 45,010 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,101 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 24,302 competing apps Median installs: 26,107 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,820 major competitor apps |
| promotion | 71 | 100 | 50 | 59 2,748 competing apps Median installs: 27,704 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| analytics | 71 | 100 | 44 | 59 2,680 competing apps Median installs: 21,297 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 210 major competitor apps |
| visual | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 16,581 competing apps Median installs: 36,393 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 2,003 major competitor apps |
App Description
In/Tangible European Heritage
ABSTRACT: Due to a wide range of digitization initiatives, cultural heritage databases have greatly enhanced access to cultural and historical data across Europe. On the one hand, tangible cultural objects from museums, archives, and libraries have become accessible online and aggregated transnationally by platforms such as Europeana. On the other hand, intangible assets—such as language-based accounts on the lives of artists—have been organized and shared as biographical databases on a national level. While these developments provide an excellent basis for the enhanced reception, utilization, and promotion of European cultural heritage, various restrictions prevent the exploitation of the existing data.
The InTaVia project aims to overcome some of these barriers with a deliberate combination of research and development objectives. Firstly, it will draw together tangible and intangible assets of European heritage to enable their mutual contextualization. Secondly, it will develop new means of data creation, curation, and transnational integration. Thirdly, it will develop a visual analytics environment to help cultural heritage experts to better access, analyze, and visually communicate cultural collections and related biographical and contextual knowledge to the interested public. Thereby, InTaVia will develop an information portal for the integration, visual analysis and communication of tangible and intangible cultural assets, supporting synoptic sensemaking and storytelling about European heritage with implications for research, pedagogy, journalism, cultural tourism, creative industries and heritage institutions.
The transdisciplinary project consortium extends existing work and collaborations in European research infrastructures and national digital humanities projects. The InTaVia team is composed of computer scientists specialized in visualization and computational linguists, digital humanists, HCI researchers, historians, and cultural heritage entrepreneurs.
AppGoblin