Stall Catchers
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 103 keywords for Stall Catchers in Google Play
Stall Catchers tracks 103 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 103 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 44.5.
Anyone can play Stall Catchers to help speed up Alzheimer's research
Tracked keywords
103
0 ranked • 103 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: walk
Avg difficulty
44.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.6
walk
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 560
- 61.8
institute
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 67
- 63.5
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 183
- 64.5
idea
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 518
- 63.2
contribute
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 202
Unranked opportunities
walk
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 560
institute
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 67
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 183
idea
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 518
contribute
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 202
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 327,470 • Major competitors: 14,496
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
experience
Total apps: 291,062 • Major competitors: 15,372
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
help
Total apps: 282,201 • Major competitors: 14,391
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
using
Total apps: 221,778 • Major competitors: 10,937
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
play
Total apps: 206,993 • Major competitors: 18,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| play | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 206,993 competing apps Median installs: 6,220 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 18,537 major competitor apps |
| online | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 196,118 competing apps Median installs: 1,362 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 9,442 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 69,687 competing apps Median installs: 649 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,827 major competitor apps |
| try | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 79,784 competing apps Median installs: 5,731 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 7,160 major competitor apps |
| easy | 65 | 100 | 57 | 88 327,470 competing apps Median installs: 1,976 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 14,496 major competitor apps |
| range | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 90,345 competing apps Median installs: 1,279 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,152 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 291,062 competing apps Median installs: 1,458 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 15,372 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 143,743 competing apps Median installs: 1,914 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,602 major competitor apps |
| section | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 32,684 competing apps Median installs: 1,041 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,051 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 60,431 competing apps Median installs: 799 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,082 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 53 | 79 85,630 competing apps Median installs: 1,274 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,957 major competitor apps |
| institute | 74 | 100 | 37 | 62 7,578 competing apps Median installs: 501 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,778 competing apps Median installs: 2,281 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,937 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 53 | 74 41,387 competing apps Median installs: 647 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,297 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 31,984 competing apps Median installs: 2,126 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,287 major competitor apps |
| menu | 71 | 100 | 54 | 73 40,587 competing apps Median installs: 612 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,229 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 60 | 87 282,201 competing apps Median installs: 1,657 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 14,391 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,581 competing apps Median installs: 2,328 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 8,230 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 42,552 competing apps Median installs: 2,843 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,096 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 55 | 76 57,523 competing apps Median installs: 3,902 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,371 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 131,355 competing apps Median installs: 2,556 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,362 major competitor apps |
| patients | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 9,685 competing apps Median installs: 668 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 183 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 85,098 competing apps Median installs: 513 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,549 major competitor apps |
| everyone | 71 | 100 | 52 | 73 40,973 competing apps Median installs: 2,487 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,185 major competitor apps |
| citizen | 73 | 100 | 37 | 57 3,818 competing apps Median installs: 1,658 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 198 major competitor apps |
App Description
Anyone can play Stall Catchers to help speed up Alzheimer's research
Stall Catchers is part of the EyesOnALZ project. The game was built on one of the oldest volunteer thinking projects: stardust@home, and is using the Virtual Microscope developed by their team. Who knew stardust and blood vessels could be so similar?
Currently, our catchers range from 6 to 88 years old. A large part of our community includes middle school students, seniors, caregivers and Alzheimer’s patients themselves.
The game is easy to grasp, and we walk you through in the beginning. Check out the 'How to' section in the main menu if you need help at any time. Don't worry about making mistakes - each blood vessel is analysed by multiple catchers, and we ensure we generate reliable crowd answers in the end.
EyesOnALZ is a citizen science project developed by the Human Computation Institute. The project enables everyone to contribute to Alzheimer’s disease research and speed up the search for a treatment. Our first citizen science game - Stall Catchers - was launched in October 2016 and now gathers thousands of volunteers.
The idea was born in 2015, when by a lucky coincidence, Pietro Michelucci met Chris Schaffer, whose lab was in need of citizen scientists’ help. The project was funded by the BrightFocus Foundation and officially began in early 2016.
EyesOnALZ includes collaborators from the Schaffer-Nishimura Lab at Cornell University, stardust@home team at U.C. Berkeley and SciStarter.com. Previous collaborators include Sebastian Seung’s Laboratory at Princeton University, WiredDifferently and others.
EyesOnALZ and Stall Catchers are being developed by the Human Computation Institute, and supported by a team of collaborators, advisors and volunteers from Cornell University, UC Berkeley, SciStarter, and elsewhere worldwide.
The EyesOnALZ Android app is being developed for Human Computation Institute in partnership with Games For Health Europe by Game Solutions Lab.
EyesOnALZ is supported by the BrightFocus foundation and its generous donors. Learn more about their Alzheimer's Disease Research Program.