Stall Catchers
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 103 keywords for Stall Catchers in Google Play
Stall Catchers tracks 103 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 103 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.5, difficulty 48.3.
Anyone can play Stall Catchers to help speed up Alzheimer's research
Tracked keywords
103
0 ranked • 103 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.5
Top keyword: human
Avg difficulty
48.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.0
human
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 717
- 68.3
solutions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 727
- 70.2
section
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,080
- 70.7
menu
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 64.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,278
- 69.7
generate
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 55.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,206
Unranked opportunities
human
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 717
solutions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.9 • Competitors: 727
section
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 1,080
menu
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 64.5 • Competitors: 1,278
generate
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 55.6 • Competitors: 1,206
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 161,730 • Major competitors: 17,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.7
help
Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
experience
Total apps: 118,077 • Major competitors: 15,561
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.8
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
play
Total apps: 113,236 • Major competitors: 19,366
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 67.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| play | 65 | 100 | 67 | 86 113,236 competing apps Median installs: 62,750 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 19,366 major competitor apps |
| online | 66 | 100 | 61 | 84 80,029 competing apps Median installs: 33,297 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,770 major competitor apps |
| health | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 23,713 competing apps Median installs: 25,526 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,845 major competitor apps |
| try | 68 | 100 | 62 | 79 44,524 competing apps Median installs: 62,670 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 7,600 major competitor apps |
| easy | 64 | 100 | 62 | 89 161,730 competing apps Median installs: 33,636 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 17,537 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 37,225 competing apps Median installs: 32,979 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,354 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 118,077 competing apps Median installs: 39,819 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 15,561 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 64,313 competing apps Median installs: 33,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,746 major competitor apps |
| section | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 12,915 competing apps Median installs: 29,599 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 19,185 competing apps Median installs: 30,368 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,887 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 34,741 competing apps Median installs: 33,606 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,020 major competitor apps |
| institute | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,080 competing apps Median installs: 13,511 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 64 | 71 15,037 competing apps Median installs: 30,161 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,552 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 52 | 72 16,253 competing apps Median installs: 32,717 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,542 major competitor apps |
| menu | 72 | 100 | 65 | 71 13,685 competing apps Median installs: 28,103 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,278 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 66 | 87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,840 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 55 | 74 20,442 competing apps Median installs: 54,128 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,169 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 60 | 76 28,360 competing apps Median installs: 55,734 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,571 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 67 | 82 64,261 competing apps Median installs: 33,401 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,565 major competitor apps |
| patients | 71 | 100 | 39 | 60 3,336 competing apps Median installs: 19,052 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| community | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 25,102 competing apps Median installs: 24,182 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,517 major competitor apps |
| everyone | 70 | 100 | 58 | 74 21,680 competing apps Median installs: 38,976 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,646 major competitor apps |
| citizen | 70 | 100 | 37 | 55 1,715 competing apps Median installs: 38,057 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 185 major competitor apps |
App Description
Anyone can play Stall Catchers to help speed up Alzheimer's research
Stall Catchers is part of the EyesOnALZ project. The game was built on one of the oldest volunteer thinking projects: stardust@home, and is using the Virtual Microscope developed by their team. Who knew stardust and blood vessels could be so similar?
Currently, our catchers range from 6 to 88 years old. A large part of our community includes middle school students, seniors, caregivers and Alzheimer’s patients themselves.
The game is easy to grasp, and we walk you through in the beginning. Check out the 'How to' section in the main menu if you need help at any time. Don't worry about making mistakes - each blood vessel is analysed by multiple catchers, and we ensure we generate reliable crowd answers in the end.
EyesOnALZ is a citizen science project developed by the Human Computation Institute. The project enables everyone to contribute to Alzheimer’s disease research and speed up the search for a treatment. Our first citizen science game - Stall Catchers - was launched in October 2016 and now gathers thousands of volunteers.
The idea was born in 2015, when by a lucky coincidence, Pietro Michelucci met Chris Schaffer, whose lab was in need of citizen scientists’ help. The project was funded by the BrightFocus Foundation and officially began in early 2016.
EyesOnALZ includes collaborators from the Schaffer-Nishimura Lab at Cornell University, stardust@home team at U.C. Berkeley and SciStarter.com. Previous collaborators include Sebastian Seung’s Laboratory at Princeton University, WiredDifferently and others.
EyesOnALZ and Stall Catchers are being developed by the Human Computation Institute, and supported by a team of collaborators, advisors and volunteers from Cornell University, UC Berkeley, SciStarter, and elsewhere worldwide.
The EyesOnALZ Android app is being developed for Human Computation Institute in partnership with Games For Health Europe by Game Solutions Lab.
EyesOnALZ is supported by the BrightFocus foundation and its generous donors. Learn more about their Alzheimer's Disease Research Program.