Alalaf
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 104 keywords for Alalaf in Google Play
Alalaf tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.3, difficulty 45.5.
A feed marketing application to reduce the supply series to the Recipient.
Tracked keywords
104
0 ranked • 104 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: reduce
Avg difficulty
45.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.5
reduce
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 913
- 68.4
attention
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,209
- 68.5
natural
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,101
- 68.6
electronic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 875
- 67.5
technical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 694
Unranked opportunities
reduce
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 913
attention
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.9 • Competitors: 1,209
natural
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 1,101
electronic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 875
technical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 694
High competition keywords
best
Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
different
Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
right
Total apps: 68,533 • Major competitors: 8,317
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.5
quality
Total apps: 61,778 • Major competitors: 6,617
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 18,001 major competitor apps |
| feed | 72 | 100 | 66 | 64 5,791 competing apps Median installs: 43,509 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 897 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 66 | 83 68,533 competing apps Median installs: 35,866 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,317 major competitor apps |
| transparency | 71 | 100 | 38 | 59 2,706 competing apps Median installs: 25,046 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 231 major competitor apps |
| modern | 70 | 100 | 52 | 76 27,345 competing apps Median installs: 33,314 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,186 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| service | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 54,184 competing apps Median installs: 29,877 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 5,377 major competitor apps |
| offer | 69 | 100 | 57 | 77 34,258 competing apps Median installs: 30,128 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,586 major competitor apps |
| program | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 19,009 competing apps Median installs: 26,294 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,273 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,843 competing apps Median installs: 26,049 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 72 | 100 | 40 | 62 4,373 competing apps Median installs: 18,172 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 318 major competitor apps |
| services | 69 | 100 | 64 | 78 38,598 competing apps Median installs: 28,828 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,045 major competitor apps |
| consulting | 70 | 100 | 34 | 52 1,144 competing apps Median installs: 22,958 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 74 major competitor apps |
| products | 70 | 100 | 58 | 76 26,531 competing apps Median installs: 29,150 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,907 major competitor apps |
| supply | 71 | 100 | 39 | 59 2,775 competing apps Median installs: 25,252 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 234 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 24,961 competing apps Median installs: 32,987 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,750 major competitor apps |
| vision | 71 | 100 | 41 | 62 4,244 competing apps Median installs: 22,167 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 377 major competitor apps |
| helping | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 14,477 competing apps Median installs: 28,866 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,392 major competitor apps |
| series | 72 | 100 | 53 | 71 14,526 competing apps Median installs: 43,250 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,895 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,778 competing apps Median installs: 31,412 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,617 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 16,618 competing apps Median installs: 30,552 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,742 major competitor apps |
| offering | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 17,968 competing apps Median installs: 28,278 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,931 major competitor apps |
| reaching | 71 | 100 | 72 | 58 2,331 competing apps Median installs: 31,416 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 269 major competitor apps |
| continue | 71 | 100 | 56 | 72 15,832 competing apps Median installs: 38,380 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,661 major competitor apps |
| fruit | 71 | 100 | 43 | 60 3,101 competing apps Median installs: 34,843 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 432 major competitor apps |
App Description
A feed marketing application to reduce the supply series to the Recipient.
This application is considered the first fruit of this cooperation. This application is brought by the partnership of the public administration of the agricultural associations and the seed and feed cooperative in the Kingdom, and the right of usufruct of natural and processed feed.
A hint about the application:
Setting up a parallel body of agricultural products (public service markets) to offer its marketing servicesto all the parties and stages of the process of agricultural production and marketing, from production, supply series, marketing services to the consumer paying attention to the formal, spatial, and temporal benefits of these products according to the modern electronic systems (modern applications)
The scope of the application:
1. Helping farmers, especially the small ones, to be stable and to continue their production by offering them meaningful revenues.
2. Reducing the role of facilitators of the agricultural products and reaching consumers in a faster way.
3. Developing the agricultural marketing system by using electronic systems and the service of feed producers who have licenses from the feed WAQF program and marketing the products of the farmers
4.Transparency in marketing.
5. Contrib
