Idemat
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 185 keywords for Idemat in Google Play
Idemat tracks 185 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 184 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.1, difficulty 43.0, best rank 12.
Sustainability at your fingertips. Inspiring materials selection for designers
Tracked keywords
185
1 ranked • 184 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 12 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: university
Avg difficulty
43.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
- 62.2
error
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 354
- 61.2
sorted
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 179
- 64.4
waste
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 411
- 61.2
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 118
Unranked opportunities
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 169
error
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 354
sorted
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 179
waste
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 411
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Competitors: 118
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,338 • Major competitors: 16,191
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
easy
Total apps: 327,701 • Major competitors: 14,519
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
make
Total apps: 327,341 • Major competitors: 18,223
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
information
Total apps: 267,617 • Major competitors: 7,567
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
features
Total apps: 253,887 • Major competitors: 13,784
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sustainability | 72 | 100 | 32 | 53 2,250 competing apps Median installs: 307 Avg rating: 1.7 | 13 | 12 | 30 major competitor apps |
| challenging | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 54,416 competing apps Median installs: 4,970 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 4,695 major competitor apps |
| navigation | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 31,042 competing apps Median installs: 1,579 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,136 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 159,331 competing apps Median installs: 1,585 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 8,091 major competitor apps |
| easy | 65 | 100 | 57 | 88 327,701 competing apps Median installs: 1,985 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 14,519 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 327,341 competing apps Median installs: 2,047 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 18,223 major competitor apps |
| choosing | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 18,970 competing apps Median installs: 2,931 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,091 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 83,940 competing apps Median installs: 1,246 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,809 major competitor apps |
| external | 73 | 100 | 48 | 67 16,756 competing apps Median installs: 1,170 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 170,973 competing apps Median installs: 1,240 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,327 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 102,786 competing apps Median installs: 1,281 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,681 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,138 competing apps Median installs: 1,239 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,070 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 99,532 competing apps Median installs: 1,618 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,519 major competitor apps |
| product | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 52,620 competing apps Median installs: 1,062 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,087 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 60,399 competing apps Median installs: 797 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,080 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 267,617 competing apps Median installs: 1,023 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,567 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 59 | 83 156,908 competing apps Median installs: 2,697 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 9,506 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 82,573 competing apps Median installs: 1,952 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,303 major competitor apps |
| life | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 114,267 competing apps Median installs: 2,067 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,060 major competitor apps |
| favourite | 72 | 100 | 48 | 69 21,016 competing apps Median installs: 3,038 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,418 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,263 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,191 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 52 | 74 41,664 competing apps Median installs: 3,560 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,348 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,683 competing apps Median installs: 852 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,737 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 42,475 competing apps Median installs: 1,452 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,898 major competitor apps |
App Description
Sustainability at your fingertips. Inspiring materials selection for designers
Sustainable design plays an increasingly important role in society and product design. However, industrial designers often struggle with choosing the right materials, think the process is too time consuming or lack the necessary support and inspiration to perform the task ahead. The IDEMAT app provides the solution and brings life cycle assessment closer to the start of the design process – an area where more significant environmental gains can be realized.
IDEMAT features two impact indicators to express environmental burden: eco-costs - a prevention based indicator for external costs - and carbon footprint. Choosing either one allows for the selection of one of three scenarios (landfill, waste treatment, and closed loop recycling for the circular economy), which are explained in detail in the app.
The end of life of a material can have a significant contribution to its overall environmental impact. By integrating the so called end-of-life scenarios at the start of the selection process, a complex and error prone step is greatly simplified.
A coherent categorization of materials allows for easy navigation and comparison. To compare materials from different categories a favourite list can be created. The over 480 unique LCI’s relate to categories such as metals and plastics, woods and textiles up to electronics, transport, derived processes and many more.
Materials within a category are visually represented as bars, sorted by score or alphabet whichever personal preference dictates. Scores directly correspond to bar size, a larger bar indicating a larger environmental impact as compared to a smaller bar indicating a less significant impact.The bar’s primary colour relates to the chosen indicator, whereas its shade communicates the chosen end-of-life scenario. The end-of-life contribution on the score (if applicable) is visualized in the bar.
Each material has its own detail screen, featuring inspiring imagery and in-depth information. The eco-costs indicator is broken down in its individual components, inspiring and challenging designers further to reduce impact in these specific areas while also providing maximum transparency.
Besides this, an overview is given of how each end-of-life scenario impacts the score of both indicators. The detail screen also provides web links to relevant additional information and allows for entries to be added to a favourite list. An identifier ID added to the bottom of the screen corresponds to the full IDEMATapp database of the Delft University of Technology (at www.ecocostsvalue.com tab data), allowing for quick reference and a further LCA analyses.
For more information see www.idematapp.com .
This App was inspired by the Makers App of Nike MSI for designers. However, MSI is not LCA based, so cannot be used for scientific materials selection, neither cradle-to-gate nor cradle-to-cradle. If you want to see the differences, save the list of materials in your favourites and compare the ranking of them with MSI.
