iReadMore
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 87 keywords for iReadMore in Google Play
iReadMore tracks 87 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 87 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 46.4.
A clinically-proven therapy for people with alexia (acquired reading impairment)
Tracked keywords
87
0 ranked • 87 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: collected
Avg difficulty
46.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.1
collected
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 688
- 68.7
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 733
- 68.4
started
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,064
- 68.5
relevant
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 790
- 70.2
medical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 802
Unranked opportunities
collected
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 688
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Competitors: 733
started
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Competitors: 1,064
relevant
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Competitors: 790
medical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 802
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
free
Total apps: 173,844 • Major competitors: 23,343
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.4
help
Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
information
Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
us
Total apps: 96,924 • Major competitors: 10,444
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 64 | 100 | 64 | 90 173,844 competing apps Median installs: 46,597 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 23,343 major competitor apps |
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| word | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 25,674 competing apps Median installs: 33,070 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,254 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 32,694 competing apps Median installs: 29,240 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,918 major competitor apps | |
| single | 69 | 100 | 56 | 77 32,754 competing apps Median installs: 37,118 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,952 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 57 | 79 39,640 competing apps Median installs: 36,260 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,807 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| scientists | 69 | 100 | 34 | 47 580 competing apps Median installs: 26,946 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| medical | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 12,810 competing apps Median installs: 23,738 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 34,741 competing apps Median installs: 33,606 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,020 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 56,251 competing apps Median installs: 34,640 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,945 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 49,228 competing apps Median installs: 35,592 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,524 major competitor apps |
| london | 69 | 100 | 36 | 50 899 competing apps Median installs: 30,574 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 66 | 87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,840 major competitor apps |
| university | 72 | 100 | 41 | 64 5,845 competing apps Median installs: 14,036 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 164 major competitor apps |
| collected | 73 | 100 | 47 | 68 9,686 competing apps Median installs: 25,493 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 688 major competitor apps |
| reading | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 26,120 competing apps Median installs: 28,202 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,913 major competitor apps |
| driven | 72 | 100 | 44 | 64 5,330 competing apps Median installs: 23,790 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 491 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 12,473 competing apps Median installs: 19,042 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 678 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 41,781 competing apps Median installs: 34,406 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,928 major competitor apps |
| effective | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 14,246 competing apps Median installs: 26,024 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,180 major competitor apps |
| tests | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 10,438 competing apps Median installs: 21,778 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 733 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 73,791 competing apps Median installs: 37,773 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,679 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 46,984 competing apps Median installs: 36,014 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 5,304 major competitor apps |
App Description
A clinically-proven therapy for people with alexia (acquired reading impairment)
It is for people with an acquired reading disorder (alexia) or aphasia due to a stroke, brain injury or dementia.
Start your 7 day free trial now!
iReadMore Features:
Adaptive Algorithm - iReadMore adapts to your abilities, keeping the therapy relevant and challenging.
Self-led Therapy - iReadMore allows you to be in control of your own therapy with unlimited access.
Science-Driven and Clinically-Proven Results - All of our rehabilitation therapies are developed through years of dedicated research at University College London by a team of scientists and clinicians.
Integrated Feedback - Complete reading tests and see your own progress.
iReadMore Research Summary:
- iReadMore therapy has been tested in two clinical trials. It was shown to improve reading ability in people with pure alexia (Woodhead et al., 2013) and central alexia (Woodhead et al., 2018)
- In the clinical trial of iReadMore for central alexia (the most common form of acquired reading disorder), the average improvement in reading accuracy was 8.7% for trained words. Three months after finishing the therapy, users still had significantly better reading ability than before they started.
- Anonymised results from the app will be collected to test how effective the app is and to improve our understanding of reading rehabilitation.
For more information and help getting started with iReadMore, please visit: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/icn/research/research-groups/neurotherapeutics/therapy-apps/ireadmore-app
If you have any other questions, please email us at ireadmore@ucl.ac.uk
iReadMore is a Class I CE marked medical device.