Calorie Intake
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 52 keywords for Calorie Intake in Google Play
Calorie Intake tracks 52 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 52 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 42.5.
Simplest kcal tracker
Tracked keywords
52
0 ranked • 52 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: prioritize
Avg difficulty
42.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 61.3
prioritize
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 176
- 63.5
logging
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 431
- 64.7
simplicity
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 334
- 59.8
counting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 289
- 64.8
prefer
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 688
Unranked opportunities
prioritize
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 176
logging
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 431
simplicity
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 334
counting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 289
prefer
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 688
High competition keywords
designed
Total apps: 260,960 • Major competitors: 7,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
view
Total apps: 183,815 • Major competitors: 5,710
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
allows
Total apps: 177,711 • Major competitors: 5,773
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
daily
Total apps: 170,087 • Major competitors: 7,784
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
provides
Total apps: 165,742 • Major competitors: 4,954
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,094 competing apps Median installs: 1,207 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,822 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,960 competing apps Median installs: 723 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,547 major competitor apps |
| prioritize | 74 | 100 | 38 | 61 7,037 competing apps Median installs: 568 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
| food | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 73,614 competing apps Median installs: 344 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,155 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 55 | 76 57,510 competing apps Median installs: 3,897 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,369 major competitor apps |
| tracking | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 68,818 competing apps Median installs: 363 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,561 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,813 competing apps Median installs: 598 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,167 major competitor apps |
| interface | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 113,683 competing apps Median installs: 1,032 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 3,277 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 28,546 competing apps Median installs: 1,092 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,050 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 183,815 competing apps Median installs: 786 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,710 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 165,742 competing apps Median installs: 1,224 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,954 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 177,711 competing apps Median installs: 1,248 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,773 major competitor apps |
| balance | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 31,564 competing apps Median installs: 2,187 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,793 major competitor apps |
| enter | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 51,929 competing apps Median installs: 2,328 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,441 major competitor apps |
| weight | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,750 competing apps Median installs: 1,290 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 753 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 73 | 100 | 37 | 59 5,141 competing apps Median installs: 2,429 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 187 major competitor apps |
| daily activity | 71 | 100 | 31 | 50 1,400 competing apps Median installs: 562 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 47 major competitor apps |
| platform | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 125,243 competing apps Median installs: 632 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 2,744 major competitor apps |
| select | 68 | 100 | 58 | 80 99,869 competing apps Median installs: 2,298 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,610 major competitor apps |
| daily | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 170,087 competing apps Median installs: 1,465 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,784 major competitor apps |
| logging | 74 | 100 | 40 | 64 9,741 competing apps Median installs: 1,643 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 431 major competitor apps |
| custom | 69 | 100 | 58 | 76 62,315 competing apps Median installs: 1,564 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,513 major competitor apps |
| tracker | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 17,530 competing apps Median installs: 1,520 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 962 major competitor apps |
| optimized | 72 | 100 | 47 | 71 27,665 competing apps Median installs: 1,406 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,235 major competitor apps |
| direct | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,707 competing apps Median installs: 1,077 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,366 major competitor apps |
App Description
Simplest kcal tracker
Fitpo is a calorie tracking application designed for users who are proficient in calorie counting and prefer direct input of calorie data.
Features:
Raw calorie input: Enter total calories consumed
Calorie burn logging: Input custom burn amounts or select daily activity levels
Daily calorie balance calculation
Weight logging functionality
Data visualization: View weight trends
App Functionality:
Fitpo allows users to bypass food searches and portion calculations. Users can input their independently calculated calorie totals directly. The app provides a platform for efficient logging and tracking of calorie intake, expenditure, and weight changes.
Fitpo is optimized for users who prioritize speed and simplicity in their calorie and weight tracking process. It provides a streamlined interface for logging and analyzing calorie balance and weight data.