Get Into Med School
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 104 keywords for Get Into Med School in Google Play
Get Into Med School tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 46.8.
Get Into Med School is a simple calculator app
Tracked keywords
104
0 ranked • 104 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: competitive
Avg difficulty
46.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.8
competitive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,091
- 68.5
reduce
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 913
- 68.3
certain
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,225
- 68.3
tell
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,072
- 67.9
similar
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 65.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,267
Unranked opportunities
competitive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 1,091
reduce
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 913
certain
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,225
tell
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Competitors: 1,072
similar
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 65.4 • Competitors: 1,267
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
easy
Total apps: 161,730 • Major competitors: 17,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.7
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
simple
Total apps: 106,353 • Major competitors: 11,187
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
different
Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| level | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,860 competing apps Median installs: 42,032 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,533 major competitor apps |
| competitive | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 9,306 competing apps Median installs: 32,378 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,091 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 56 | 77 32,754 competing apps Median installs: 37,118 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,952 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 44,242 competing apps Median installs: 25,117 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,188 major competitor apps |
| easy | 64 | 100 | 62 | 89 161,730 competing apps Median installs: 33,636 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 17,537 major competitor apps |
| make | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,922 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,596 major competitor apps |
| medical | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 12,810 competing apps Median installs: 23,738 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| profile | 72 | 100 | 60 | 71 14,433 competing apps Median installs: 33,182 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,629 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 51 | 76 26,487 competing apps Median installs: 29,378 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,330 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 39,078 competing apps Median installs: 31,139 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,448 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 61 | 85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,854 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| account | 68 | 100 | 60 | 79 41,533 competing apps Median installs: 33,567 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,686 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 52 | 72 16,635 competing apps Median installs: 29,493 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,927 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 24,961 competing apps Median installs: 32,987 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,750 major competitor apps |
| helping | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 14,477 competing apps Median installs: 28,866 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,392 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 19,904 competing apps Median installs: 36,597 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,266 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 69 | 85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 13,574 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 106,353 competing apps Median installs: 32,331 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,187 major competitor apps |
| contain | 72 | 100 | 56 | 65 6,736 competing apps Median installs: 34,474 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 630 major competitor apps |
| apply | 70 | 100 | 55 | 75 24,305 competing apps Median installs: 42,318 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,025 major competitor apps |
| become | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 59,069 competing apps Median installs: 60,770 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,342 major competitor apps |
| much | 68 | 100 | 57 | 81 52,113 competing apps Median installs: 34,180 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,352 major competitor apps |
App Description
Get Into Med School is a simple calculator app
This system was originally created as a supplement to, not a replacement for, the already widely-utilized LizzyM scoring system. As a reference, the LizzyM score is defined as (GPA*10)+MCAT and may contain a +1 or -1 modifier in certain situations. The applicant's LizzyM score is then compared to the LizzyM score for a school to determine whether or not the applicant is statistically competitive for that school. However, the inherent simplicity of the LizzyM score, while making it quick and easy to generate and apply, also creates problems endemic to systems that reduce and generalize. The two major simplifications are the reduction of an entire application to two (already numerical) metrics and the assumption that the LizzyM score accounts for the majority of, if not all of, the variability attributed to selectivity.
While there is merit to these assumptions, which is why the LizzyM score is so widely used, there are also deficiencies that need to be addressed in order to create a more accurate system for assessing an application. One of these deficiencies is that certain schools with similar LizzyM schools may be in very different levels of competitiveness. For example, although UVA and Duke have identical LizzyM scores, it is clear that Duke is a much more selective school than UVA. Additionally, small differences in LizzyM score become significant when using this metric to assess competitiveness for two similar schools. For example, Duke has a LizzyM score of 75, while Yale has a LizzyM score of 76; both schools are similarly selective, but someone might (very mistakenly) advise a applicant with a 3.9/36 that they are more competitive for Duke than they are for Yale. Finally, the LizzyM score is used as a way to tell if someone is statistically competitive for a single school and is significantly less useful for helping an applicant come up with a list of schools.
The Applicant Rating System - Overview
The WedgeDawg Applicant Rating System (ARS) was created to address these deficiencies. It takes into account most of the factors that make up an application to medical school, gives an applicant a separate score for each one, and then gives an applicant a numerical rating. This numerical rating is then translated to a category level and a profile of schools to apply to is created based on that category.
King of the Curve do
