Get Into Med School

48 installs
ratings
Get Into Med School icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 104 keywords for Get Into Med School in Google Play

Developer: King of the Curve (KOTC) Category: medical

Get Into Med School tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 43.2.

Get Into Med School is a simple calculator app

Tracked keywords

104

0  ranked •  104  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.8

Top keyword: contain

Avg difficulty

43.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • contain

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Rank —

    Competitors: 583

    64.8
  • scoring

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —

    Competitors: 261

    60.2
  • rating

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 608

    65.7
  • schools

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 145

    64.0
  • determine

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

    Competitors: 577

    65.8

Unranked opportunities

  • contain

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Competitors: 583

  • scoring

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 261

  • rating

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 608

  • schools

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Competitors: 145

  • determine

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 577

High competition keywords

  • easy

    Total apps: 331,281 • Major competitors: 16,423

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5

  • make

    Total apps: 330,586 • Major competitors: 20,510

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9

  • simple

    Total apps: 249,726 • Major competitors: 12,059

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1

  • using

    Total apps: 224,667 • Major competitors: 12,360

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0

  • way

    Total apps: 203,300 • Major competitors: 11,331

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
level681005480

104,955 competing apps

Median installs: 2,535

Avg rating: 2.5

6,877

major competitor apps

competitive721004670

24,069 competing apps

Median installs: 1,320

Avg rating: 2.3

1,195

major competitor apps

single691005178

73,270 competing apps

Median installs: 2,368

Avg rating: 2.5

4,213

major competitor apps

order671005282

140,112 competing apps

Median installs: 557

Avg rating: 2.3

4,296

major competitor apps

easy651005688

331,281 competing apps

Median installs: 2,450

Avg rating: 2.4

16,423

major competitor apps

make651005888

330,586 competing apps

Median installs: 2,478

Avg rating: 2.5

20,510

major competitor apps

whether661005384

195,157 competing apps

Median installs: 953

Avg rating: 2.3

7,857

major competitor apps

medical711004472

33,255 competing apps

Median installs: 1,248

Avg rating: 2.1

882

major competitor apps

used681005581

117,242 competing apps

Median installs: 3,096

Avg rating: 2.4

5,234

major competitor apps

profile711005173

38,221 competing apps

Median installs: 1,033

Avg rating: 2.3

1,730

major competitor apps

created701004876

56,431 competing apps

Median installs: 1,948

Avg rating: 2.4

2,203

major competitor apps

list691005278

81,768 competing apps

Median installs: 2,565

Avg rating: 2.4

3,557

major competitor apps

way661005685

203,300 competing apps

Median installs: 1,967

Avg rating: 2.5

11,331

major competitor apps

using661005785

224,667 competing apps

Median installs: 2,837

Avg rating: 2.5

12,360

major competitor apps

account681005479

92,466 competing apps

Median installs: 2,093

Avg rating: 2.6

4,915

major competitor apps

score711004874

41,369 competing apps

Median installs: 1,563

Avg rating: 2.5

2,016

major competitor apps

small701004976

56,434 competing apps

Median installs: 2,176

Avg rating: 2.4

2,887

major competitor apps

helping711004573

36,548 competing apps

Median installs: 984

Avg rating: 2.3

1,240

major competitor apps

accurate701004875

50,895 competing apps

Median installs: 1,434

Avg rating: 2.4

2,486

major competitor apps

create661006084

197,691 competing apps

Median installs: 3,071

Avg rating: 2.6

14,326

major competitor apps

simple661005586

249,726 competing apps

Median installs: 2,085

Avg rating: 2.4

12,059

major competitor apps

contain741004965

11,637 competing apps

Median installs: 4,880

Avg rating: 2.4

583

major competitor apps

apply701005074

43,531 competing apps

Median installs: 6,270

Avg rating: 2.7

3,233

major competitor apps

become681005480

103,841 competing apps

Median installs: 5,321

Avg rating: 2.6

9,771

major competitor apps

much681005281

113,033 competing apps

Median installs: 1,776

Avg rating: 2.5

5,873

major competitor apps

104 keywords
1 of 5

App Description

Get Into Med School is a simple calculator app

The LizzyM System

This system was originally created as a supplement to, not a replacement for, the already widely-utilized LizzyM scoring system. As a reference, the LizzyM score is defined as (GPA*10)+MCAT and may contain a +1 or -1 modifier in certain situations. The applicant's LizzyM score is then compared to the LizzyM score for a school to determine whether or not the applicant is statistically competitive for that school. However, the inherent simplicity of the LizzyM score, while making it quick and easy to generate and apply, also creates problems endemic to systems that reduce and generalize. The two major simplifications are the reduction of an entire application to two (already numerical) metrics and the assumption that the LizzyM score accounts for the majority of, if not all of, the variability attributed to selectivity.

While there is merit to these assumptions, which is why the LizzyM score is so widely used, there are also deficiencies that need to be addressed in order to create a more accurate system for assessing an application. One of these deficiencies is that certain schools with similar LizzyM schools may be in very different levels of competitiveness. For example, although UVA and Duke have identical LizzyM scores, it is clear that Duke is a much more selective school than UVA. Additionally, small differences in LizzyM score become significant when using this metric to assess competitiveness for two similar schools. For example, Duke has a LizzyM score of 75, while Yale has a LizzyM score of 76; both schools are similarly selective, but someone might (very mistakenly) advise a applicant with a 3.9/36 that they are more competitive for Duke than they are for Yale. Finally, the LizzyM score is used as a way to tell if someone is statistically competitive for a single school and is significantly less useful for helping an applicant come up with a list of schools.

The Applicant Rating System - Overview

The WedgeDawg Applicant Rating System (ARS) was created to address these deficiencies. It takes into account most of the factors that make up an application to medical school, gives an applicant a separate score for each one, and then gives an applicant a numerical rating. This numerical rating is then translated to a category level and a profile of schools to apply to is created based on that category.

King of the Curve do