Get Into Med School

Get Into Med School
Get Into Med School
Developer: King of the
Category: Medical
48 installs
ratings
Get Into Med School icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 104 keywords for Get Into Med School in Google Play

Developer: King of the Curve (KOTC) Category: medical

Get Into Med School tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 46.8.

Get Into Med School is a simple calculator app

Tracked keywords

104

0  ranked •  104  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.6

Top keyword: competitive

Avg difficulty

46.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • competitive

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,091

    67.8
  • reduce

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —

    Competitors: 913

    68.5
  • certain

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,225

    68.3
  • tell

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,072

    68.3
  • similar

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 65.4 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,267

    67.9

Unranked opportunities

  • competitive

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 1,091

  • reduce

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 913

  • certain

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,225

  • tell

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Competitors: 1,072

  • similar

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 65.4 • Competitors: 1,267

High competition keywords

  • make

    Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0

  • easy

    Total apps: 161,730 • Major competitors: 17,537

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.7

  • using

    Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0

  • simple

    Total apps: 106,353 • Major competitors: 11,187

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1

  • different

    Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
level681006080

47,860 competing apps

Median installs: 42,032

Avg rating: 3.1

6,533

major competitor apps

competitive731005068

9,306 competing apps

Median installs: 32,378

Avg rating: 2.7

1,091

major competitor apps

single691005677

32,754 competing apps

Median installs: 37,118

Avg rating: 2.9

3,952

major competitor apps

order681005579

44,242 competing apps

Median installs: 25,117

Avg rating: 2.7

4,188

major competitor apps

easy641006289

161,730 competing apps

Median installs: 33,636

Avg rating: 2.8

17,537

major competitor apps

make641006589

163,352 competing apps

Median installs: 42,108

Avg rating: 3.0

21,922

major competitor apps

whether671005883

76,585 competing apps

Median installs: 31,919

Avg rating: 2.9

8,596

major competitor apps

medical721004570

12,810 competing apps

Median installs: 23,738

Avg rating: 2.6

802

major competitor apps

used671006182

61,233 competing apps

Median installs: 32,225

Avg rating: 2.8

5,711

major competitor apps

profile721006071

14,433 competing apps

Median installs: 33,182

Avg rating: 2.7

1,629

major competitor apps

created701005176

26,487 competing apps

Median installs: 29,378

Avg rating: 2.8

2,330

major competitor apps

list691005778

39,078 competing apps

Median installs: 31,139

Avg rating: 2.8

3,448

major competitor apps

way661006185

89,339 competing apps

Median installs: 36,402

Avg rating: 3.0

10,854

major competitor apps

using651006486

114,758 competing apps

Median installs: 37,480

Avg rating: 2.8

13,323

major competitor apps

account681006079

41,533 competing apps

Median installs: 33,567

Avg rating: 3.0

4,686

major competitor apps

score711005272

16,635 competing apps

Median installs: 29,493

Avg rating: 3.0

1,927

major competitor apps

small701005175

24,961 competing apps

Median installs: 32,987

Avg rating: 2.9

2,750

major competitor apps

helping721004871

14,477 competing apps

Median installs: 28,866

Avg rating: 2.9

1,392

major competitor apps

accurate711005073

19,904 competing apps

Median installs: 36,597

Avg rating: 2.9

2,266

major competitor apps

create661006985

93,845 competing apps

Median installs: 45,191

Avg rating: 3.0

13,574

major competitor apps

simple661005986

106,353 competing apps

Median installs: 32,331

Avg rating: 2.8

11,187

major competitor apps

contain721005665

6,736 competing apps

Median installs: 34,474

Avg rating: 2.8

630

major competitor apps

apply701005575

24,305 competing apps

Median installs: 42,318

Avg rating: 3.0

3,025

major competitor apps

become671006182

59,069 competing apps

Median installs: 60,770

Avg rating: 3.0

10,342

major competitor apps

much681005781

52,113 competing apps

Median installs: 34,180

Avg rating: 2.9

6,352

major competitor apps

104 keywords
1 of 5

App Description

Get Into Med School is a simple calculator app

The LizzyM System

This system was originally created as a supplement to, not a replacement for, the already widely-utilized LizzyM scoring system. As a reference, the LizzyM score is defined as (GPA*10)+MCAT and may contain a +1 or -1 modifier in certain situations. The applicant's LizzyM score is then compared to the LizzyM score for a school to determine whether or not the applicant is statistically competitive for that school. However, the inherent simplicity of the LizzyM score, while making it quick and easy to generate and apply, also creates problems endemic to systems that reduce and generalize. The two major simplifications are the reduction of an entire application to two (already numerical) metrics and the assumption that the LizzyM score accounts for the majority of, if not all of, the variability attributed to selectivity.

While there is merit to these assumptions, which is why the LizzyM score is so widely used, there are also deficiencies that need to be addressed in order to create a more accurate system for assessing an application. One of these deficiencies is that certain schools with similar LizzyM schools may be in very different levels of competitiveness. For example, although UVA and Duke have identical LizzyM scores, it is clear that Duke is a much more selective school than UVA. Additionally, small differences in LizzyM score become significant when using this metric to assess competitiveness for two similar schools. For example, Duke has a LizzyM score of 75, while Yale has a LizzyM score of 76; both schools are similarly selective, but someone might (very mistakenly) advise a applicant with a 3.9/36 that they are more competitive for Duke than they are for Yale. Finally, the LizzyM score is used as a way to tell if someone is statistically competitive for a single school and is significantly less useful for helping an applicant come up with a list of schools.

The Applicant Rating System - Overview

The WedgeDawg Applicant Rating System (ARS) was created to address these deficiencies. It takes into account most of the factors that make up an application to medical school, gives an applicant a separate score for each one, and then gives an applicant a numerical rating. This numerical rating is then translated to a category level and a profile of schools to apply to is created based on that category.

King of the Curve do