Get Into Med School

48 installs
Ratings not yet available
2.00 monthly active users
Revenue not available
Get Into Med School icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 104 keywords for Get Into Med School in Google Play

Developer: King of the Curve (KOTC) Category: medical Rating: 2.84

Get Into Med School tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 44.0.

Get Into Med School is a simple calculator app

Tracked keywords

104

0  ranked •  104  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.8

Top keyword: contain

Avg difficulty

44.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • contain

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 506

    64.7
  • scoring

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —

    Competitors: 243

    60.4
  • rating

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.3 • Rank —

    Competitors: 589

    65.7
  • schools

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 138

    64.0
  • determine

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 512

    65.7

Unranked opportunities

  • contain

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Competitors: 506

  • scoring

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 243

  • rating

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.3 • Competitors: 589

  • schools

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 138

  • determine

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 512

High competition keywords

  • easy

    Total apps: 327,701 • Major competitors: 14,519

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3

  • make

    Total apps: 327,341 • Major competitors: 18,223

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8

  • simple

    Total apps: 256,476 • Major competitors: 11,035

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8

  • using

    Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9

  • way

    Total apps: 206,164 • Major competitors: 10,421

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
level681005580

109,650 competing apps

Median installs: 1,859

Avg rating: 2.1

6,423

major competitor apps

competitive721004770

24,602 competing apps

Median installs: 1,196

Avg rating: 1.9

1,146

major competitor apps

single691005278

75,078 competing apps

Median installs: 1,819

Avg rating: 2.0

3,979

major competitor apps

order671005282

142,080 competing apps

Median installs: 480

Avg rating: 1.8

4,028

major competitor apps

easy651005788

327,701 competing apps

Median installs: 1,985

Avg rating: 2.0

14,519

major competitor apps

make651005988

327,341 competing apps

Median installs: 2,047

Avg rating: 2.1

18,223

major competitor apps

whether661005484

192,632 competing apps

Median installs: 882

Avg rating: 1.9

6,833

major competitor apps

medical711004472

33,909 competing apps

Median installs: 1,039

Avg rating: 1.9

840

major competitor apps

used681005581

116,194 competing apps

Median installs: 2,383

Avg rating: 2.0

4,649

major competitor apps

profile711005273

38,936 competing apps

Median installs: 872

Avg rating: 1.9

1,600

major competitor apps

created701004876

55,816 competing apps

Median installs: 1,592

Avg rating: 2.0

1,989

major competitor apps

list691005378

82,573 competing apps

Median installs: 1,952

Avg rating: 2.0

3,303

major competitor apps

way661005785

206,164 competing apps

Median installs: 1,630

Avg rating: 2.1

10,421

major competitor apps

using661005885

221,966 competing apps

Median installs: 2,289

Avg rating: 2.0

10,965

major competitor apps

account681005579

93,969 competing apps

Median installs: 1,719

Avg rating: 2.1

4,674

major competitor apps

score711004974

42,475 competing apps

Median installs: 1,452

Avg rating: 1.9

1,898

major competitor apps

small701005076

57,588 competing apps

Median installs: 1,656

Avg rating: 2.0

2,714

major competitor apps

helping711004573

36,051 competing apps

Median installs: 878

Avg rating: 1.9

1,110

major competitor apps

accurate701004875

55,009 competing apps

Median installs: 876

Avg rating: 1.9

2,278

major competitor apps

create661006284

201,739 competing apps

Median installs: 2,495

Avg rating: 2.1

13,289

major competitor apps

simple661005686

256,476 competing apps

Median installs: 1,672

Avg rating: 1.9

11,035

major competitor apps

contain741005265

11,555 competing apps

Median installs: 3,664

Avg rating: 2.1

506

major competitor apps

apply701005274

44,079 competing apps

Median installs: 4,455

Avg rating: 2.2

2,984

major competitor apps

become681005580

102,830 competing apps

Median installs: 4,648

Avg rating: 2.2

8,739

major competitor apps

much681005280

111,742 competing apps

Median installs: 1,459

Avg rating: 2.0

5,278

major competitor apps

104 keywords
1 of 5

App Description

Get Into Med School is a simple calculator app

The LizzyM System

This system was originally created as a supplement to, not a replacement for, the already widely-utilized LizzyM scoring system. As a reference, the LizzyM score is defined as (GPA*10)+MCAT and may contain a +1 or -1 modifier in certain situations. The applicant's LizzyM score is then compared to the LizzyM score for a school to determine whether or not the applicant is statistically competitive for that school. However, the inherent simplicity of the LizzyM score, while making it quick and easy to generate and apply, also creates problems endemic to systems that reduce and generalize. The two major simplifications are the reduction of an entire application to two (already numerical) metrics and the assumption that the LizzyM score accounts for the majority of, if not all of, the variability attributed to selectivity.

While there is merit to these assumptions, which is why the LizzyM score is so widely used, there are also deficiencies that need to be addressed in order to create a more accurate system for assessing an application. One of these deficiencies is that certain schools with similar LizzyM schools may be in very different levels of competitiveness. For example, although UVA and Duke have identical LizzyM scores, it is clear that Duke is a much more selective school than UVA. Additionally, small differences in LizzyM score become significant when using this metric to assess competitiveness for two similar schools. For example, Duke has a LizzyM score of 75, while Yale has a LizzyM score of 76; both schools are similarly selective, but someone might (very mistakenly) advise a applicant with a 3.9/36 that they are more competitive for Duke than they are for Yale. Finally, the LizzyM score is used as a way to tell if someone is statistically competitive for a single school and is significantly less useful for helping an applicant come up with a list of schools.

The Applicant Rating System - Overview

The WedgeDawg Applicant Rating System (ARS) was created to address these deficiencies. It takes into account most of the factors that make up an application to medical school, gives an applicant a separate score for each one, and then gives an applicant a numerical rating. This numerical rating is then translated to a category level and a profile of schools to apply to is created based on that category.

King of the Curve do