HeatX
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 101 keywords for HeatX in Google Play
HeatX tracks 101 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 101 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 44.8.
HeatX analyzes performance in a Shell & Tube heat exchanger with U-coefficient.
Tracked keywords
101
0 ranked • 101 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: definition
Avg difficulty
44.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
definition
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 609
- 64.4
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 367
- 63.6
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 530
- 61.8
descriptions
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 126
- 60.9
vary
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 71.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 468
Unranked opportunities
definition
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Competitors: 609
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 367
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 530
descriptions
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 126
vary
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 71.0 • Competitors: 468
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 385,850 • Major competitors: 16,372
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
using
Total apps: 222,760 • Major competitors: 11,093
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
create
Total apps: 200,665 • Major competitors: 13,287
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
choose
Total apps: 196,321 • Major competitors: 12,236
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
different
Total apps: 187,171 • Major competitors: 13,720
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| change | 68 | 100 | 53 | 79 90,292 competing apps Median installs: 3,556 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,880 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,213 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 99,020 competing apps Median installs: 1,651 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,526 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,709 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 59 | 83 156,061 competing apps Median installs: 2,758 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 9,506 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 60 | 71 28,900 competing apps Median installs: 4,450 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,184 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 82,336 competing apps Median installs: 1,975 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,302 major competitor apps |
| choose | 66 | 100 | 57 | 84 196,321 competing apps Median installs: 2,313 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 12,236 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 222,760 competing apps Median installs: 2,297 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 11,093 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 59 | 89 385,850 competing apps Median installs: 1,264 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 16,372 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 137,173 competing apps Median installs: 1,374 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,451 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 118,372 competing apps Median installs: 1,169 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,344 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 56 | 81 129,574 competing apps Median installs: 2,394 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 8,197 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,430 competing apps Median installs: 381 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 314 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 116,979 competing apps Median installs: 1,204 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,642 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 62 | 84 200,665 competing apps Median installs: 2,550 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 13,287 major competitor apps |
| area | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,876 competing apps Median installs: 1,426 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,311 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 101,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,136 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,601 major competitor apps |
| tube | 72 | 100 | 36 | 52 1,780 competing apps Median installs: 4,874 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 155 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 49,269 competing apps Median installs: 3,115 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,620 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 17,051 competing apps Median installs: 2,389 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 596 major competitor apps |
| performance | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 65,394 competing apps Median installs: 882 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 1,826 major competitor apps |
| needed | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 19,239 competing apps Median installs: 1,721 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 821 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 64,956 competing apps Median installs: 2,853 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,079 major competitor apps |
| unit | 74 | 100 | 43 | 64 10,969 competing apps Median installs: 1,276 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 367 major competitor apps |
App Description
HeatX analyzes performance in a Shell & Tube heat exchanger with U-coefficient.
Manufacturers generally provide design specification data such as heat transfer Area, U-coefficient, effectiveness for a given capacity performance. However, these values tend to vary over a period of time and often it is necessary to evaluate and compare design specification data with actual performance. This app serves as a tool for different maintenance personnel, energy and application engineers in monitoring performance and energy efficiency in a shell and tube heat exchanger.
Fluid Properties:
Users can quickly select different fluids for both shell side and tube side application from a list of most common fluids used in industrial applications. The key property data such as density and heat capacity is evaluated based on given temperature and pressure for the given fluid. For fluids that are not in the list, users can create a custom fluid with known property data. Data can be edited in both SI and USCS unit standards.
Heat Exchanger Data:
One can choose heat exchanger depending upon type of application as well as flows. Both inside and outside heat transfer area can be computed using the tube side dimensional data for verification purpose as shown in the following screen shot.
Performance Summary
The over all heat transfer coefficient is computed and presented in the main screen. The additional result gives different key performance characteristics of a heat exchanger. App notes has all the definition and brief descriptions of different key parameters presented in the summary.
