Sofa Score Calculator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 67 keywords for Sofa Score Calculator in Google Play
Sofa Score Calculator tracks 67 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 67 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 43.7.
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
Tracked keywords
67
0 ranked • 67 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: tracks
Avg difficulty
43.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.5
tracks
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 54.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,717
- 70.2
medical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 802
- 62.2
unit
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 360
- 63.1
regardless
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 494
- 65.4
determine
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 610
Unranked opportunities
tracks
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 54.7 • Competitors: 1,717
medical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 802
unit
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Competitors: 360
regardless
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 494
determine
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Competitors: 610
High competition keywords
every
Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
based
Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
manage
Total apps: 61,484 • Major competitors: 6,560
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
used
Total apps: 61,233 • Major competitors: 5,711
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| care | 70 | 100 | 54 | 74 22,840 competing apps Median installs: 33,782 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,611 major competitor apps |
| medical | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 12,810 competing apps Median installs: 23,738 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| manage | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 61,484 competing apps Median installs: 27,358 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,560 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| rate | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 24,148 competing apps Median installs: 33,875 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,128 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 52 | 72 16,635 competing apps Median installs: 29,493 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,927 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 19,612 competing apps Median installs: 35,316 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,942 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 19,087 competing apps Median installs: 23,470 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,617 major competitor apps |
| stay | 68 | 100 | 67 | 81 51,579 competing apps Median installs: 26,352 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 5,332 major competitor apps |
| every | 65 | 100 | 62 | 87 125,665 competing apps Median installs: 38,364 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,037 major competitor apps |
| unit | 72 | 100 | 45 | 62 4,386 competing apps Median installs: 26,646 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 360 major competitor apps |
| useful | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 27,683 competing apps Median installs: 33,574 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,561 major competitor apps |
| units | 71 | 100 | 43 | 62 4,147 competing apps Median installs: 31,383 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 477 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 26,003 competing apps Median installs: 32,925 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,321 major competitor apps |
| assessment | 71 | 100 | 37 | 58 2,496 competing apps Median installs: 19,000 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
| prior | 71 | 100 | 44 | 62 3,973 competing apps Median installs: 31,947 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 71 | 100 | 38 | 59 2,717 competing apps Median installs: 29,096 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 233 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 63 | 82 67,175 competing apps Median installs: 30,073 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,592 major competitor apps |
| hours | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 26,636 competing apps Median installs: 34,190 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,282 major competitor apps |
| status | 70 | 100 | 54 | 75 23,009 competing apps Median installs: 26,299 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,197 major competitor apps |
| scoring | 71 | 100 | 40 | 57 2,297 competing apps Median installs: 29,204 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 245 major competitor apps |
| predicting | 68 | 100 | 45 | 45 426 competing apps Median installs: 27,286 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
| specific | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 26,226 competing apps Median installs: 27,691 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,394 major competitor apps |
| regardless | 72 | 100 | 41 | 63 4,914 competing apps Median installs: 34,538 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 494 major competitor apps |
App Description
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
- It tracks a person's status during the stay in the ICU to determine the extent of a person's organ function or rate of failure.
- The SOFA scoring system is useful in predicting the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. According to an observational study at an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Belgium, the mortality rate is at least 50% when the score is increased, regardless of the initial score, in the first 96 hours of admission, 27% to 35% if the score remains unchanged, and less than 27% if the score is reduced. The score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.
- The SOFA scoring system is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems. The score is calculated on admission and every 24 hours until discharge using the worst parameters measured during the prior 24 hours.