Anfíbios do Quadrilátero
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 96 keywords for Anfíbios do Quadrilátero in Google Play
Anfíbios do Quadrilátero tracks 96 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 96 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 46.8.
Identification keys for adults and tadpoles
Tracked keywords
96
0 ranked • 96 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: choosing
Avg difficulty
46.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.9
choosing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,133
- 68.1
largest
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,165
- 68.4
country
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 64.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,144
- 67.9
almost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,047
- 70.9
traditional
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,414
Unranked opportunities
choosing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 1,133
largest
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 1,165
country
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 64.1 • Competitors: 1,144
almost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Competitors: 1,047
traditional
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Competitors: 1,414
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
simple
Total apps: 106,353 • Major competitors: 11,187
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
information
Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
choose
Total apps: 100,655 • Major competitors: 14,766
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.1
many
Total apps: 96,753 • Major competitors: 12,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| top | 68 | 100 | 65 | 80 46,866 competing apps Median installs: 46,978 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,127 major competitor apps |
| follow | 69 | 100 | 58 | 77 33,026 competing apps Median installs: 35,928 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,898 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 44,242 competing apps Median installs: 25,117 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,188 major competitor apps |
| make | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,922 major competitor apps |
| choosing | 73 | 100 | 47 | 68 9,425 competing apps Median installs: 35,705 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,133 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 56 | 79 41,673 competing apps Median installs: 30,529 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,566 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| choose | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 100,655 competing apps Median installs: 46,844 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,766 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 72 | 100 | 47 | 71 14,045 competing apps Median installs: 28,059 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,414 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 57 | 79 40,681 competing apps Median installs: 35,653 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,828 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 16,594 competing apps Median installs: 15,694 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,185 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 68 | 80 47,754 competing apps Median installs: 40,524 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,815 major competitor apps |
| located | 72 | 100 | 41 | 63 5,156 competing apps Median installs: 17,624 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 324 major competitor apps |
| area | 72 | 100 | 54 | 71 13,871 competing apps Median installs: 28,178 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,388 major competitor apps |
| many | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,574 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 38,943 competing apps Median installs: 28,037 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,793 major competitor apps |
| center | 72 | 100 | 48 | 69 11,147 competing apps Median installs: 31,391 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,133 major competitor apps |
| easily | 66 | 100 | 65 | 85 96,583 competing apps Median installs: 32,526 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,194 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 106,353 competing apps Median installs: 32,331 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,187 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 31,519 competing apps Median installs: 30,635 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,488 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,325 competing apps Median installs: 25,959 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,926 major competitor apps |
| includes | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 33,489 competing apps Median installs: 30,818 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,100 major competitor apps |
| identify | 72 | 100 | 61 | 69 11,226 competing apps Median installs: 31,104 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,212 major competitor apps |
App Description
Identification keys for adults and tadpoles
Aiming to make the correct determination of species a more accessible task, we provide here an illustrated and interactive tool that enables the identification of species, in the adult and larval stages, of anurans of the Iron Quadrangle. Aided by an illustrated tutorial, specially developed for the species in the region, the user can choose which characteristics to use in the identification process, from those simple and easily visualized in the field, to the more detailed ones, visible only under a magnifying glass. Unlike traditional dichotomous keys in which you have to follow a predetermined order of steps, in many cases, choosing just a few characters is enough to identify a species.
Authors: Leite, F.S.F.; Santos, M.T.T.; Pinheiro, P.D.P.; Lacerda, J.V.; Leal, F.; Garcia, P.C.A.; Pezzuti, T.L.
Original source: This key is part of the Amphibians of the Iron Quadrangle project. More information available at http://saglab.ufv.br/aqf/
Powered by LucidMobile
