Key to the Cassinia group
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 146 keywords for Key to the Cassinia group in Google Play
Key to the Cassinia group tracks 146 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 146 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 46.8.
Lucid key to the shrubby daisies Cassinia, Ozothamnus and their close relatives.
Tracked keywords
146
0 ranked • 146 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: interested
Avg difficulty
46.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.2
interested
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 909
- 68.3
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 877
- 67.8
helpful
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 73.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,013
- 68.0
side
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,185
- 68.5
natural
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,101
Unranked opportunities
interested
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 909
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Competitors: 877
helpful
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 73.7 • Competitors: 1,013
side
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Competitors: 1,185
natural
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 1,101
High competition keywords
find
Total apps: 143,808 • Major competitors: 16,874
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.1
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
information
Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| character | 72 | 100 | 52 | 70 13,287 competing apps Median installs: 65,694 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,166 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,596 major competitor apps |
| particularly | 71 | 100 | 37 | 57 2,113 competing apps Median installs: 23,500 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| scientist | 68 | 100 | 32 | 43 322 competing apps Median installs: 40,424 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| transparency | 71 | 100 | 38 | 59 2,706 competing apps Median installs: 25,046 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 231 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 51 | 76 26,487 competing apps Median installs: 29,378 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,330 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 39,078 competing apps Median installs: 31,139 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,448 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 65 | 88 143,808 competing apps Median installs: 36,002 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,874 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 57 | 79 40,681 competing apps Median installs: 35,653 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,828 major competitor apps |
| note | 71 | 100 | 53 | 72 16,600 competing apps Median installs: 34,914 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,579 major competitor apps |
| de | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 7,241 competing apps Median installs: 22,978 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 644 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 57 | 75 23,850 competing apps Median installs: 31,586 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,738 major competitor apps |
| group | 71 | 100 | 63 | 73 19,138 competing apps Median installs: 24,928 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,759 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 24,961 competing apps Median installs: 32,987 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,750 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| helping | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 14,477 competing apps Median installs: 28,866 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,392 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 68 | 100 | 69 | 80 51,305 competing apps Median installs: 33,814 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,661 major competitor apps |
| moment | 72 | 100 | 51 | 70 12,376 competing apps Median installs: 36,206 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,419 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,088 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 31,519 competing apps Median installs: 30,635 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,488 major competitor apps |
App Description
Lucid key to the shrubby daisies Cassinia, Ozothamnus and their close relatives.
The key does not cover two hybrids; Cassinia x adunca is considered to be a hybrid of and intermediate between C. complanata and C. tegulata, and Ozothamnus x expansifolius is a name for any presumed hybrid of O. hookeri regardless of the other parent and thus not a natural unit. Also not covered at this moment are the three informal phrase name taxa Ozothamnus sp. Boonoo Boonoo, O. sp. Ebor Falls, and O. sp. Mt Tomah.
The key was produced by CSIRO scientist Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn and Kirsten Cowley at the Australian National Herbarium (CANB) through funding from the Bush Blitz Applied Taxonomy grant scheme. We would be grateful if mistakes or other feedback were communicated to the first author.
The following characters may be particularly useful for quickly narrowing down the possibilities during identification: capitulescence size, capitulescence structure, leaf dimensions, leaf shape, indumentum (hairs) of young leaves and stems, flowering head dimensions, whether involucral bracts are straight or radiating, and, in particular for smaller flowering heads, the number of flowers per head. (Note that leaf hairs refer to the surfaces, that is excepting hair types found only in the mid-rib groove on the upper side of young leaves.) Colour, texture or transparency of involucral bracts are somewhat more subjective and should be used with care, as their interpretation may differ a bit from person to person.
The key is deliberately written to minimise the use of technical terms. All morphological characters are illustrated, species are illustrated and have distribution maps, and the key provides species profiles and links to the Atlas of Living Australia. Below the character list the user will find options for taxonomic or geographic subselection, allowing for example to restrict the key to Tasmanian Ozothamnus, if so desired.
We are grateful to Anthony Orchard for lending his expertise on Cassinia to this project; Nunzio Knerr for helping with the generation of distribution maps; Miguel de Salas for helpful discussions on the distribution of several species in Tasmania; the herbaria AD, BRI, HO, NE, NSW, and PERTH for making available specimens for study; and Parks Australia for funding through the Bush Blitz Applied Taxonomy grant scheme. Bush Blitz is a partnership between the Australian Government, BHP Billiton Sustainable Communities and Earthwatch Institute.
This app was created using the Lucid Mobile platform, part of the Lucid suite of tools. If you are interested in creating a similar app, or for further information on creating interactive keys, please visit http://www.lucidcentral.org
