Key to the Cassinia group
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 146 keywords for Key to the Cassinia group in Google Play
Key to the Cassinia group tracks 146 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 146 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 42.6.
Lucid key to the shrubby daisies Cassinia, Ozothamnus and their close relatives.
Tracked keywords
146
0 ranked • 146 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: regardless
Avg difficulty
42.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.6
regardless
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 446
- 63.7
refer
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 370
- 63.2
transparency
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 279
- 62.9
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 421
- 62.6
bit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 753
Unranked opportunities
regardless
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 446
refer
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 370
transparency
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 279
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 421
bit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 753
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 340,665 • Major competitors: 12,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
find
Total apps: 308,533 • Major competitors: 17,760
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.4
mobile
Total apps: 281,675 • Major competitors: 11,156
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
information
Total apps: 268,463 • Major competitors: 8,219
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
using
Total apps: 221,253 • Major competitors: 12,091
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| character | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 24,383 competing apps Median installs: 8,258 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,303 major competitor apps |
| whether | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 191,932 competing apps Median installs: 992 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,669 major competitor apps |
| particularly | 73 | 100 | 36 | 58 4,446 competing apps Median installs: 1,922 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| scientist | 70 | 100 | 32 | 45 639 competing apps Median installs: 3,570 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 268,463 competing apps Median installs: 1,201 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,219 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 115,888 competing apps Median installs: 3,156 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,095 major competitor apps |
| transparency | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 9,275 competing apps Median installs: 596 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 55,659 competing apps Median installs: 1,993 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,180 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 82,854 competing apps Median installs: 2,555 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,582 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 221,253 competing apps Median installs: 2,895 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 12,091 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 308,533 competing apps Median installs: 2,782 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 17,760 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 58 | 84 200,888 competing apps Median installs: 2,598 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 10,487 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 281,675 competing apps Median installs: 1,458 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 11,156 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 122,251 competing apps Median installs: 1,373 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,893 major competitor apps |
| note | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,060 competing apps Median installs: 4,207 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,692 major competitor apps |
| de | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 17,873 competing apps Median installs: 1,575 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 713 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 53,634 competing apps Median installs: 2,153 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,972 major competitor apps |
| group | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 48,417 competing apps Median installs: 1,402 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,898 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,933 competing apps Median installs: 2,160 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,940 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 340,665 competing apps Median installs: 1,167 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 12,547 major competitor apps |
| helping | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 35,919 competing apps Median installs: 1,018 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,213 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 68 | 100 | 57 | 81 115,947 competing apps Median installs: 1,461 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,135 major competitor apps |
| moment | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 31,579 competing apps Median installs: 1,938 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,647 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 165,260 competing apps Median installs: 1,454 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,567 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 67,526 competing apps Median installs: 1,848 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,175 major competitor apps |
App Description
Lucid key to the shrubby daisies Cassinia, Ozothamnus and their close relatives.
The key does not cover two hybrids; Cassinia x adunca is considered to be a hybrid of and intermediate between C. complanata and C. tegulata, and Ozothamnus x expansifolius is a name for any presumed hybrid of O. hookeri regardless of the other parent and thus not a natural unit. Also not covered at this moment are the three informal phrase name taxa Ozothamnus sp. Boonoo Boonoo, O. sp. Ebor Falls, and O. sp. Mt Tomah.
The key was produced by CSIRO scientist Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn and Kirsten Cowley at the Australian National Herbarium (CANB) through funding from the Bush Blitz Applied Taxonomy grant scheme. We would be grateful if mistakes or other feedback were communicated to the first author.
The following characters may be particularly useful for quickly narrowing down the possibilities during identification: capitulescence size, capitulescence structure, leaf dimensions, leaf shape, indumentum (hairs) of young leaves and stems, flowering head dimensions, whether involucral bracts are straight or radiating, and, in particular for smaller flowering heads, the number of flowers per head. (Note that leaf hairs refer to the surfaces, that is excepting hair types found only in the mid-rib groove on the upper side of young leaves.) Colour, texture or transparency of involucral bracts are somewhat more subjective and should be used with care, as their interpretation may differ a bit from person to person.
The key is deliberately written to minimise the use of technical terms. All morphological characters are illustrated, species are illustrated and have distribution maps, and the key provides species profiles and links to the Atlas of Living Australia. Below the character list the user will find options for taxonomic or geographic subselection, allowing for example to restrict the key to Tasmanian Ozothamnus, if so desired.
We are grateful to Anthony Orchard for lending his expertise on Cassinia to this project; Nunzio Knerr for helping with the generation of distribution maps; Miguel de Salas for helpful discussions on the distribution of several species in Tasmania; the herbaria AD, BRI, HO, NE, NSW, and PERTH for making available specimens for study; and Parks Australia for funding through the Bush Blitz Applied Taxonomy grant scheme. Bush Blitz is a partnership between the Australian Government, BHP Billiton Sustainable Communities and Earthwatch Institute.
This app was created using the Lucid Mobile platform, part of the Lucid suite of tools. If you are interested in creating a similar app, or for further information on creating interactive keys, please visit http://www.lucidcentral.org
