Lepidopteran Families

Developer: LucidMobile

Category: Books & Reference

347 installs

Ratings not yet available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 109 keywords for Lepidopteran Families in Google Play

Developer: LucidMobile Category: books_and_reference

Lepidopteran Families tracks 109 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 109 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 67.9, difficulty 46.3.

Interactive key to Lepidopteran Families of Biosecurity Concern

Tracked keywords

109

0 ranked • 109 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

67.9

Top keyword: existing

Avg difficulty

46.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

existing

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 926
68.5
prepared

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 964
67.5
strategy

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 2,300
70.9
curated

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 874
67.0
would like

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 623
64.4

Unranked opportunities

existing

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.0 • Competitors: 926
prepared

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.2 • Competitors: 964
strategy

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.6 • Competitors: 2,300
curated

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Competitors: 874
would like

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Competitors: 623

High competition keywords

like

Total apps: 150,415 • Major competitors: 21,531

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.5
features

Total apps: 116,743 • Major competitors: 14,116

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
using

Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
information

Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
strategy	72	100	53	71 14,192 competing apps Median installs: 55,073 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	2,300 major competitor apps
health	70	100	52	75 23,713 competing apps Median installs: 25,526 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,845 major competitor apps
single	69	100	56	77 32,754 competing apps Median installs: 37,118 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,952 major competitor apps
version	69	100	61	77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	3,300 major competitor apps
sheet	70	100	39	56 1,932 competing apps Median installs: 29,158 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	143 major competitor apps
images	69	100	59	78 37,077 competing apps Median installs: 30,933 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,614 major competitor apps
range	69	100	53	78 37,225 competing apps Median installs: 32,979 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	4,354 major competitor apps
curated	72	100	57	67 8,327 competing apps Median installs: 27,737 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	874 major competitor apps
digital	68	100	55	79 42,168 competing apps Median installs: 26,988 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	4,209 major competitor apps
information	66	100	59	86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	7,805 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
manage	67	100	62	82 61,484 competing apps Median installs: 27,358 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,560 major competitor apps
created	70	100	51	76 26,487 competing apps Median installs: 29,378 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,330 major competitor apps
avoid	71	100	61	72 16,708 competing apps Median installs: 44,275 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,344 major competitor apps
using	65	100	64	86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	13,323 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
key	68	100	57	79 40,681 competing apps Median installs: 35,653 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,828 major competitor apps
diagnostic	70	100	53	55 1,622 competing apps Median installs: 19,557 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	105 major competitor apps
create	66	100	69	85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	13,574 major competitor apps
many	66	100	62	85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	12,574 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	60	83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,088 major competitor apps
tools	69	100	62	76 29,774 competing apps Median installs: 35,852 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	3,872 major competitor apps
quality	67	100	61	82 61,778 competing apps Median installs: 31,412 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,617 major competitor apps
would like	72	100	46	64 5,883 competing apps Median installs: 36,886 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	623 major competitor apps
easily	66	100	65	85 96,583 competing apps Median installs: 32,526 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,194 major competitor apps

App Description

Interactive key to Lepidopteran Families of Biosecurity Concern

An interactive lucid key is presented to assist in recognising families of targeted Lepidoptera of biosecurity concern using morphological characters of the adult. Many existing keys to adult Lepidoptera lack good illustrations of the important characters and this key provides high quality photographs of all the characters used. Easily identifiable features that are visible on set specimens using a stereomicroscope have been chosen in an attempt to avoid where possible, the type of characters requiring manipulation or dissection of the specimen for example, wing venation, apodemes and genitalia.

The range of families included in the key encompasses those exotic species identified by Plant Health Australia (2012), Department of Agriculture (Northern Australia Quarantine Strategy) (2013) and the National Plant Biosecurity Strategy Diagnostic Network (2013). The key has been adapted from Nielsen et al. (1991), Kristensen (1999) and Holloway et al. (1987). Diagnoses were evaluated using data from Bradley (1986), Common (1990), Holloway (2011), Kyrki (1984), Landry (2003), Miller (1991), Nielsen et al. (1996), Solis (2007) and Zborowski et al. (2007).

Diagnostic images were taken by S. Anderson and Y. Luo, and were prepared from curated specimens, using LEICA DC300 digital camera and Leica DC Twain® version 5.1.10 software. Numerous photographs of each specimen were taken at differing focal planes and these were montaged using Automontage Essentials® 5.020096 ES to produce a single image. Images were taken at 2592 x 1944 resolution and saved in TIFF format.

The authors would like to thank Ted Edwards for his extensive lepidopteran expertise, Matt Taylor, James Walker, John Nielsen, Len Willan, David Britton, Thomas Wallenius, You Ning Su, and Luke Halling.

How to cite this key

Anderson SJ, Luo YY & Bellis GA (2017). Lepidopteran Families of Biosecurity Concern. Interactive Lucid Key. Northern Australian Quarantine Strategy, Department of Agriculture

Software used

Lucid v3.6 was used to construct and manage the identification key.

Fact Sheet Fusion v2 was used to manage the images and data and create fact sheets for both the web and mobile application.

The app was created using the Lucid Mobile Platform.

For more information on these tools please visit: http://www.lucidcentral.org