Soil Structure Assessment

Developer: Landwirtschaftsverlag Münster

Category: Business

7.8K installs

ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 30 keywords for Soil Structure Assessment in Google Play

Developer: Landwirtschaftsverlag Münster Category: business

Soil Structure Assessment tracks 30 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 30 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 45.2.

Guidelines for a simple assessment of soil structure.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 30 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.2

Top keyword: field

Avg difficulty

45.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

field

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 677
68.7
draw

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,624
68.2
activity

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 56.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 980
68.8
site

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 689
67.1
base

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 761
64.2

Unranked opportunities

field

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
draw

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 1,624
activity

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 56.7 • Competitors: 980
site

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Competitors: 689
base

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 761

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
simple

Total apps: 106,353 • Major competitors: 11,187

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
tool

Total apps: 38,943 • Major competitors: 3,793

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
current

Total apps: 37,523 • Major competitors: 3,434

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
match

Total apps: 33,130 • Major competitors: 4,751

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
help	65	100	66	87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	14,840 major competitor apps
activity	72	100	57	69 10,591 competing apps Median installs: 28,338 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	980 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	53	78 38,943 competing apps Median installs: 28,037 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,793 major competitor apps
simple	66	100	59	86 106,353 competing apps Median installs: 32,331 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	11,187 major competitor apps
match	69	100	57	77 33,130 competing apps Median installs: 45,070 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	4,751 major competitor apps
current	69	100	54	78 37,523 competing apps Median installs: 28,093 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	3,434 major competitor apps
structure	71	100	38	60 3,147 competing apps Median installs: 25,310 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	225 major competitor apps
root	71	100	44	58 2,401 competing apps Median installs: 69,366 Avg rating: 3.3	—	—	409 major competitor apps
assessment	71	100	37	58 2,496 competing apps Median installs: 19,000 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	120 major competitor apps
field	73	100	45	69 10,538 competing apps Median installs: 19,519 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	677 major competitor apps
status	70	100	54	75 23,009 competing apps Median installs: 26,299 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	2,197 major competitor apps
specific	70	100	56	76 26,226 competing apps Median installs: 27,691 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,394 major competitor apps
draw	73	100	52	68 9,765 competing apps Median installs: 62,178 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	1,624 major competitor apps
site	72	100	46	67 8,500 competing apps Median installs: 25,324 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	689 major competitor apps
base	72	100	45	64 5,734 competing apps Median installs: 39,050 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	761 major competitor apps
regarding	72	100	49	66 7,308 competing apps Median installs: 26,292 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	609 major competitor apps
enables	72	100	57	71 13,596 competing apps Median installs: 24,298 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,073 major competitor apps
soil	69	100	35	47 584 competing apps Median installs: 24,392 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	46 major competitor apps
current status	69	100	30	46 499 competing apps Median installs: 17,724 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	43 major competitor apps
organic	70	100	36	53 1,260 competing apps Median installs: 29,410 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	112 major competitor apps
adapted	71	100	40	59 2,941 competing apps Median installs: 27,430 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	228 major competitor apps
looked	69	100	46	48 662 competing apps Median installs: 51,076 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	95 major competitor apps
areas	72	100	46	69 10,964 competing apps Median installs: 25,730 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,024 major competitor apps
machines	71	100	48	60 3,147 competing apps Median installs: 73,032 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	634 major competitor apps
closer	72	100	46	67 8,576 competing apps Median installs: 32,737 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	901 major competitor apps

App Description

Guidelines for a simple assessment of soil structure.

These guidelines for a simple assessment of soil structure should help to draw conclusions on the current status of the soil structure for the implementation of conservation tillage and adapted field traffic.
For this the soil areas surface, tilled topsoil, topsoil base and adjacent subsoil are closer looked at regarding their structure, root penetration of the soil, earthworm activity and incorporation of organic residues. This tool enables you to match the machines to the site specific compaction sensitiveness.