NTRMEDNET
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 45 keywords for NTRMEDNET in Google Play
NTRMEDNET tracks 45 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 45 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.5, difficulty 50.0.
Secure off-campus access to NTR library resources, anytime, anywhere.
Tracked keywords
45
0 ranked • 45 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.5
Top keyword: library
Avg difficulty
50.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 70.7
library
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 64.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,491
- 64.4
university
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 164
- 70.2
powered
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 82.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,436
- 62.8
minimal
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 447
- 69.3
remote
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,098
Unranked opportunities
library
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 64.8 • Competitors: 1,491
university
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 164
powered
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 82.1 • Competitors: 1,436
minimal
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 447
remote
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Competitors: 1,098
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
designed
Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
based
Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
including
Total apps: 66,643 • Major competitors: 8,693
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.4
users
Total apps: 59,104 • Major competitors: 6,026
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| library | 72 | 100 | 65 | 71 13,762 competing apps Median installs: 29,536 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,491 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 42,168 competing apps Median installs: 26,988 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,209 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 19,185 competing apps Median installs: 30,368 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,887 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| secure | 69 | 100 | 66 | 78 35,889 competing apps Median installs: 30,578 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,055 major competitor apps |
| connectivity | 71 | 100 | 47 | 59 2,723 competing apps Median installs: 27,936 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 255 major competitor apps |
| campus | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,169 competing apps Median installs: 11,014 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 63 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 64 | 82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,693 major competitor apps |
| university | 72 | 100 | 41 | 64 5,845 competing apps Median installs: 14,036 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 164 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| powered | 72 | 100 | 82 | 70 12,785 competing apps Median installs: 29,315 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,436 major competitor apps |
| ensures | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 17,651 competing apps Median installs: 30,658 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,038 major competitor apps |
| hosted | 70 | 100 | 39 | 54 1,524 competing apps Median installs: 26,422 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| devices | 70 | 100 | 67 | 75 25,598 competing apps Median installs: 36,807 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,146 major competitor apps |
| map | 71 | 100 | 55 | 74 20,503 competing apps Median installs: 41,142 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,443 major competitor apps |
| offering | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 17,968 competing apps Median installs: 28,278 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,931 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 81 | 78 38,391 competing apps Median installs: 39,224 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 5,234 major competitor apps |
| minimal | 72 | 100 | 45 | 63 4,761 competing apps Median installs: 25,156 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 447 major competitor apps |
| solution | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 26,114 competing apps Median installs: 18,502 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,816 major competitor apps |
| remote | 72 | 100 | 51 | 69 11,381 competing apps Median installs: 30,710 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,098 major competitor apps |
| resources | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 13,299 competing apps Median installs: 25,415 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,193 major competitor apps |
| platform | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 38,205 competing apps Median installs: 18,669 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,769 major competitor apps |
| seamless access | 69 | 100 | 30 | 46 513 competing apps Median installs: 22,652 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 63 | 82 67,175 competing apps Median installs: 30,073 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,592 major competitor apps |
App Description
Secure off-campus access to NTR library resources, anytime, anywhere.
The app supports off-campus learning and research by offering seamless access to licensed e-resources, including scholarly databases, e-journals, and e-books. Compatible across smartphones, tablets, and laptops, NTRMEDNET ensures reliable connectivity through cloud-based hosting and minimal downtime.
Key Features:
Secure remote access to university library content
24/7 access from any location
Works across devices and platforms
Reliable, cloud-hosted architecture
Simple login and user-friendly interface
Ideal for students, researchers, and academic staff
NTRMEDNET is powered by MAPMyAccess, a remote access platform developed by MAP Systems.