FACEPASS - Apollo HR
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 136 keywords for FACEPASS - Apollo HR in Google Play
FACEPASS - Apollo HR tracks 136 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 136 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 43.9.
Apollo HR access control attendance has evolved again, and facial recognition is convenient and fast.
Tracked keywords
136
0 ranked • 136 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: pressure
Avg difficulty
43.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
pressure
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 530
- 61.5
innovation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 170
- 66.1
integration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 360
- 60.3
transformation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 304
- 59.5
recognized
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 162
Unranked opportunities
pressure
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 530
innovation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Competitors: 170
integration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Competitors: 360
transformation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 304
recognized
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 162
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 368,929 • Major competitors: 21,444
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
access
Total apps: 339,043 • Major competitors: 11,559
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.5
mobile
Total apps: 280,792 • Major competitors: 10,253
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
enjoy
Total apps: 279,708 • Major competitors: 18,165
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
simple
Total apps: 256,476 • Major competitors: 11,035
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 60 | 89 368,929 competing apps Median installs: 2,547 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 21,444 major competitor apps |
| card | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 69,472 competing apps Median installs: 3,540 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 4,664 major competitor apps |
| changes | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 27,783 competing apps Median installs: 1,238 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,013 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 75,078 competing apps Median installs: 1,819 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,979 major competitor apps |
| enjoy | 65 | 100 | 59 | 87 279,708 competing apps Median installs: 2,956 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 18,165 major competitor apps |
| collect | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 77,599 competing apps Median installs: 3,435 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,807 major competitor apps |
| images | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 72,113 competing apps Median installs: 2,506 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,919 major competitor apps |
| range | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 90,340 competing apps Median installs: 1,278 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,149 major competitor apps |
| sensing | 70 | 100 | 26 | 44 540 competing apps Median installs: 1,032 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| contact | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 138,467 competing apps Median installs: 1,503 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,795 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 102,786 competing apps Median installs: 1,281 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,681 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 124,534 competing apps Median installs: 778 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,271 major competitor apps |
| innovation | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 7,319 competing apps Median installs: 534 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| management | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 111,277 competing apps Median installs: 490 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 2,440 major competitor apps |
| control | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 135,996 competing apps Median installs: 1,524 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,843 major competitor apps |
| needs | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,411 competing apps Median installs: 1,108 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,316 major competitor apps |
| choose | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 195,566 competing apps Median installs: 2,302 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 12,116 major competitor apps |
| immediately | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,277 competing apps Median installs: 2,481 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 870 major competitor apps |
| convenient | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 75,566 competing apps Median installs: 1,289 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,064 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,792 competing apps Median installs: 1,234 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,253 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 136,849 competing apps Median installs: 1,367 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,403 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,551 competing apps Median installs: 2,326 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 8,222 major competitor apps |
| combine | 73 | 100 | 46 | 67 15,755 competing apps Median installs: 4,142 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,206 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 37,188 competing apps Median installs: 2,988 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
App Description
Apollo HR access control attendance has evolved again, and facial recognition is convenient and fast.
In terms of attendance management, companies generally choose to combine access control with employee attendance punching. However, the commonly used card-based access control cannot prevent the possibility of non-employees punching in on their behalf, except that the card is easily stolen and lost. . However, with the continuous innovation and breakthrough of technology in recent years, enterprises also have more choices for digital transformation and application.
Unlike fingerprint recognition, which requires electronic pressure sensing to collect fingerprints, facial recognition only needs to be within a certain range of visibility, and it can be automatically recognized without direct contact with the device. With the continuous improvement over time, facial recognition technology has become more accurate, and new-generation mobile phones such as airport rapid customs clearance, surveillance systems, mobile payment, and iPhone have been fully introduced, and MAYO has also implemented this advanced technology in the HR field.
Enterprises adopting facial recognition as a tool for attendance management will have the following five advantages:
1. Thoroughly implement anti-counterfeiting punch-in – eliminate the problems of human tampering, punching in and forgetting to bring the card, and provide accurate attendance management information.
2. Comprehensive integration of a single system – Integrate facial recognition punch-in and cloud human resources system, and enjoy all-round human resources solutions such as attendance management and salary settlement at one time.
3. High-accuracy recognition function – the daily punch-in images are automatically stored, and the independent database can identify them accurately, and the punch-in will no longer be queued.
4. Low cost of construction - no additional wiring is required, low hardware cost (just use general mobile devices), and high CP value.
5. Simple and fast system deployment – personnel changes in multiple stores/offices can be updated synchronously, and new personnel can punch in immediately through simple settings.