Mzadcom
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 86 keywords for Mzadcom in Google Play
Mzadcom tracks 86 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 86 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 47.3.
An Online Platform exclusively for Online Bidding
Tracked keywords
86
0 ranked • 86 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: field
Avg difficulty
47.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.7
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 677
- 68.7
cost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 980
- 68.5
organized
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 763
- 68.3
solutions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 727
- 67.9
sell
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,283
Unranked opportunities
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
cost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 980
organized
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Competitors: 763
solutions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.9 • Competitors: 727
sell
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.4 • Competitors: 1,283
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
create
Total apps: 93,845 • Major competitors: 13,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 69.1
available
Total apps: 92,463 • Major competitors: 9,952
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.4
online
Total apps: 80,029 • Major competitors: 9,770
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.8
whether
Total apps: 76,585 • Major competitors: 8,596
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| online | 66 | 100 | 61 | 84 80,029 competing apps Median installs: 33,297 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,770 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 44,242 competing apps Median installs: 25,117 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,188 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 58 | 81 54,601 competing apps Median installs: 29,805 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,243 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,596 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,371 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| place | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 37,575 competing apps Median installs: 32,284 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,364 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 37,225 competing apps Median installs: 32,979 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,354 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 75,490 competing apps Median installs: 41,387 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 9,726 major competitor apps |
| service | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 54,184 competing apps Median installs: 29,877 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 5,377 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 72 | 100 | 47 | 71 14,045 competing apps Median installs: 28,059 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,414 major competitor apps |
| wide range | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 18,925 competing apps Median installs: 33,783 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,261 major competitor apps |
| serve | 72 | 100 | 45 | 66 7,540 competing apps Median installs: 28,996 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 858 major competitor apps |
| international | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 15,943 competing apps Median installs: 33,008 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,857 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| company | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 17,480 competing apps Median installs: 21,812 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,330 major competitor apps |
| sale | 72 | 100 | 45 | 63 4,564 competing apps Median installs: 30,527 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 495 major competitor apps |
| products | 70 | 100 | 58 | 76 26,531 competing apps Median installs: 29,150 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,907 major competitor apps |
| community | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 25,102 competing apps Median installs: 24,182 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,517 major competitor apps |
| smart | 68 | 100 | 63 | 80 46,851 competing apps Median installs: 34,670 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 5,609 major competitor apps |
| market | 71 | 100 | 49 | 71 15,034 competing apps Median installs: 24,689 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,338 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 69 | 85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 13,574 major competitor apps |
| obstacles | 72 | 100 | 53 | 67 8,244 competing apps Median installs: 48,386 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,363 major competitor apps |
App Description
An Online Platform exclusively for Online Bidding
We Mzadcom have our own developed Online Auction Website as well as mobile application in order to sale the materials via Online Auction.
The company studied and analyzed the local and international auction market and reached to innovative, Organized and smart solutions to serve both exhibitor and bidder in partnership with local companies and an Omani work team. Mzadcom electronic auction system seeks to overcome all obstacles and barriers in the field of auctions, provide the community with opportunity to benefit from auctions available in the local and international markets, save effort and money, support charitable organization, and create job opportunities.
Mzadcom website & the mobile application provides a service in which users or participants can sell or bid for products via the Internet. Item preview takes place in the exhibitions of the institutions, whether governmental or private. The websites aims to provide the auction opportunity for a wide range of society since it removes the limitations and setbacks that may prevents bidders from attending traditional auctions such geographical distance. It also decreases the cost of conducting traditional auctions for institutions.