LubePM
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 55 keywords for LubePM in Google Play
LubePM tracks 55 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 55 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.4, difficulty 52.3.
Manage your lubrication, daily inspection & condition-based maintenance routes.
Tracked keywords
55
0 ranked • 55 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.4
Top keyword: task
Avg difficulty
52.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.6
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 61.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,156
- 68.7
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 677
- 66.9
route
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 833
- 62.1
maintenance
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 274
- 65.6
database
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 482
Unranked opportunities
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 61.2 • Competitors: 1,156
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
route
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Competitors: 833
maintenance
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 274
database
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 482
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
download
Total apps: 139,812 • Major competitors: 15,046
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
us
Total apps: 96,924 • Major competitors: 10,444
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| download | 65 | 100 | 60 | 88 139,812 competing apps Median installs: 34,022 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 15,046 major competitor apps |
| make | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,922 major competitor apps |
| contact | 67 | 100 | 58 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 30,986 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,729 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 19,185 competing apps Median installs: 30,368 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,887 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 27,195 competing apps Median installs: 35,290 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,073 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 32,852 competing apps Median installs: 18,996 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,393 major competitor apps |
| manage | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 61,484 competing apps Median installs: 27,358 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,560 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 39,078 competing apps Median installs: 31,139 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,448 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| account | 68 | 100 | 60 | 79 41,533 competing apps Median installs: 33,567 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,686 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 64 | 82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,693 major competitor apps |
| task | 73 | 100 | 61 | 68 9,006 competing apps Median installs: 39,110 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,156 major competitor apps |
| tracking | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 17,753 competing apps Median installs: 21,637 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,519 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| track | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 58,055 competing apps Median installs: 25,840 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 5,673 major competitor apps |
| easier | 70 | 100 | 62 | 75 25,194 competing apps Median installs: 31,651 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,581 major competitor apps |
| please | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 75,311 competing apps Median installs: 36,602 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,632 major competitor apps |
| web | 71 | 100 | 61 | 72 16,914 competing apps Median installs: 27,890 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,758 major competitor apps |
| required | 70 | 100 | 61 | 75 23,390 competing apps Median installs: 41,967 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,770 major competitor apps |
| route | 72 | 100 | 60 | 67 8,234 competing apps Median installs: 28,913 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 833 major competitor apps |
| maintenance | 72 | 100 | 39 | 62 4,305 competing apps Median installs: 16,270 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,589 major competitor apps |
| field | 73 | 100 | 45 | 69 10,538 competing apps Median installs: 19,519 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 677 major competitor apps |
App Description
Manage your lubrication, daily inspection & condition-based maintenance routes.
We make reliable lubrication easier with in-field routing capabilities for your lubrication routes, daily inspections, top-ups, and overall condition-based maintenance. Routes created/assigned by your LubePM scheduler (using the LubePM web platform) are available for download and use offline. Once the routes are completed, they can be submitted for route tracking and task compliance. Additionally, you will have direct access to your facility's lubrication point data, including lubricants, hardware, operating requirements and procedures.
FEATURES
• Route Execution Tools
• Lubrication Inspection Walk-Throughs with Reference Images
• Track Completion, Provide Inspection Feedback, Add Notes and Photos
• Lubrication Asset Data and Image Database Access
• Plant-wide Lubrication List
• Application List Per Lubricant
A Noria account is required to use this app. Please contact us for more information.
