OpenEvidence
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for OpenEvidence in Google Play
OpenEvidence tracks 76 keywords (2 keywords rank; 74 need traction). Key metrics: 50% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.8, difficulty 44.5, best rank 1.
OpenEvidence provides accurate answers at the point of care (NPI REQUIRED)
Tracked keywords
76
2 ranked • 74 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
50%
Best rank 1 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: patient
Avg difficulty
44.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 65.3
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 348
- 64.9
decision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 545
- 65.5
verified
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 542
- 65.2
united
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 617
Unranked opportunities
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 195
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 348
decision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 545
verified
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Competitors: 542
united
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 617
High competition keywords
find
Total apps: 307,165 • Major competitors: 16,288
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
like
Total apps: 289,444 • Major competitors: 20,631
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
information
Total apps: 267,617 • Major competitors: 7,567
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
best
Total apps: 255,713 • Major competitors: 16,877
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
available
Total apps: 199,899 • Major competitors: 9,729
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| evidence | 73 | 100 | 35 | 56 3,528 competing apps Median installs: 1,477 Avg rating: 1.9 | 1 | 1 | 84 major competitor apps |
| opened | 73 | 100 | 38 | 58 4,463 competing apps Median installs: 2,815 Avg rating: 2.1 | 23 | 23 | 212 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 255,713 competing apps Median installs: 3,150 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 16,877 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 109,650 competing apps Median installs: 1,859 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,423 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 69,675 competing apps Median installs: 648 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,824 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 56,144 competing apps Median installs: 1,254 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,569 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 170,973 competing apps Median installs: 1,240 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,327 major competitor apps |
| date | 68 | 100 | 53 | 79 93,268 competing apps Median installs: 699 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,736 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,909 competing apps Median installs: 1,039 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 840 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 267,617 competing apps Median installs: 1,023 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,567 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 53 | 79 85,638 competing apps Median installs: 1,274 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,959 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 58 | 81 130,776 competing apps Median installs: 1,982 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,602 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 60 | 87 307,165 competing apps Median installs: 2,265 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 16,288 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 199,899 competing apps Median installs: 2,015 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 9,729 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 131,336 competing apps Median installs: 2,553 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,363 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,262 competing apps Median installs: 658 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 314 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 55,009 competing apps Median installs: 876 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,278 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 85,069 competing apps Median installs: 512 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,549 major competitor apps |
| power | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 67,486 competing apps Median installs: 1,961 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,797 major competitor apps |
| partner | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 27,437 competing apps Median installs: 961 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,066 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,704 competing apps Median installs: 528 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| ai | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 51,846 competing apps Median installs: 1,616 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,861 major competitor apps |
| official | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 110,629 competing apps Median installs: 766 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,476 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 289,444 competing apps Median installs: 3,592 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 20,631 major competitor apps |
| light | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 42,841 competing apps Median installs: 2,474 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,200 major competitor apps |
App Description
OpenEvidence provides accurate answers at the point of care (NPI REQUIRED)
OpenEvidence is trusted by hundreds of thousands of verified healthcare professionals to support high-stakes clinical decisions at the point of care with answers that are sourced, cited, and grounded in peer-reviewed medical literature.
OpenEvidence is the fastest-growing and most widely-used clinical decision support platform in the world–used daily, on average, by over 40% of physicians in the United States, spanning more than 10,000 hospitals and medical centers nationwide.
Now sourcing from over 300+ medical journals, as well as the FDA and CDC. OpenEvidence is an official AI partner of The New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of American Medical Association (and their 11 specialty journals), and has content agreements, partnerships and collaborations with:
• NCCN
• ACC
• ADA
• ACEP
• AAFP
• AAOS
• AAOHNS and more.
OpenEvidence is only available for health care professionals. Users must verify their health care professional status before using OpenEvidence.
TESTIMONIALS
“I've been using OpenEvidence for the last week - it has been amazing! Able to narrow down on results quickly and find information that I wasn't able to do with Google/PubMed searches on my own.” - Dr. John Lee, MD. Physician & Faculty Member, Harvard Medical School
“OpenEvidence can be the foundational technology to power all clinical decision tools.” - Dr. Antonio Jorge Forte, MD. Director of MayoExpert, Mayo Clinic
“OpenEvidence is more up-to-date than UpToDate. And more useful regardless, since it’s interactive, and you can ask it questions, and get very specific answers about specific medical fact patterns in a patient case. It’s like having a curbside consult with a team of expert physicians, but that you can carry around with you in your pocket.” - Dr. Ram Dandillaya, MD. Clinical Chief, Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
“I am in community practice and medical director of a community cancer center. OpenEvidence has been an incredible lifeline for daily practitioners.” - C.J., Oncologist
“OpenEvidence is absolutely fantastic. I use it a gazillion times a day.” - J.A., Neurologist
“OpenEvidence’s efforts to make medicine more evidence-based are invaluable. The shift from judgment to calculation can reduce the level of noise currently found in medicine.” - Daniel Kahneman, Nobel Prize Laureate (In Memoriam)
“It is light years ahead of the next best medical oriented AI I have used.” - R.E.., Oncologist