OpenEvidence
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 143 keywords for OpenEvidence in Google Play
OpenEvidence tracks 143 keywords (7 keywords rank; 136 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.5, difficulty 47.1, best rank 31.
OpenEvidence provides accurate answers at the point of care (NPI REQUIRED)
Tracked keywords
143
7 ranked • 136 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 31 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.5
Top keyword: reduce
Avg difficulty
47.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.5
reduce
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 913
- 68.3
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 877
- 68.0
featuring
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,297
- 68.7
keeps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 55.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,239
- 66.9
professionals
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank 78
Competitors: 466
Unranked opportunities
reduce
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 913
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Competitors: 877
featuring
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.4 • Competitors: 1,297
keeps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 55.6 • Competitors: 1,239
medical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 802
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
make
Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
like
Total apps: 150,415 • Major competitors: 21,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.5
find
Total apps: 143,808 • Major competitors: 16,874
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.1
best
Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| specific | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 26,226 competing apps Median installs: 27,691 Avg rating: 2.9 | 36 | 31 | 2,394 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 19,904 competing apps Median installs: 36,597 Avg rating: 2.9 | 60 | 60 | 2,266 major competitor apps |
| useful | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 27,683 competing apps Median installs: 33,574 Avg rating: 2.8 | 61 | 61 | 2,561 major competitor apps |
| professionals | 72 | 100 | 43 | 67 8,269 competing apps Median installs: 17,969 Avg rating: 2.5 | 78 | 78 | 466 major competitor apps |
| leading | 72 | 100 | 52 | 70 13,188 competing apps Median installs: 28,999 Avg rating: 2.7 | 85 | 85 | 1,326 major competitor apps |
| able | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 35,901 competing apps Median installs: 32,096 Avg rating: 2.8 | 98 | 88 | 3,585 major competitor apps |
| ask | 71 | 100 | 74 | 71 15,110 competing apps Median installs: 26,594 Avg rating: 2.7 | 170 | 170 | 1,363 major competitor apps |
| best | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 18,001 major competitor apps |
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,860 competing apps Median installs: 42,032 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,533 major competitor apps |
| health | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 23,713 competing apps Median installs: 25,526 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,845 major competitor apps |
| make | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,922 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 54 | 74 22,840 competing apps Median installs: 33,782 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,611 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,371 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 60 | 77 31,688 competing apps Median installs: 26,732 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,809 major competitor apps |
| medical | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 12,810 competing apps Median installs: 23,738 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 34,741 competing apps Median installs: 33,606 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,020 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 65 | 88 143,808 competing apps Median installs: 36,002 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,874 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 69 | 100 | 56 | 79 39,579 competing apps Median installs: 28,449 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,140 major competitor apps |
| discover | 68 | 100 | 63 | 81 52,912 competing apps Median installs: 37,326 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,947 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 67 | 82 64,261 competing apps Median installs: 33,401 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,565 major competitor apps |
App Description
OpenEvidence provides accurate answers at the point of care (NPI REQUIRED)
OpenEvidence is the world’s leading medical information platform for health care professionals, providing accurate and efficient answers at the point of care. Every answer on OpenEvidence is always sourced, cited, and grounded in the peer-reviewed medical literature.
Now featuring New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published content, NEJM multimedia content, and NEJM invited review articles authored by the world’s leading clinical experts.
• 160 medical specialties
• 1,000+ diseases and therapeutic areas
• 1m+ medical topics
Trusted by medical professionals at 10,000+ care centers across the United States.
OpenEvidence is only available for health care professionals. Users must verify their health care professional status before using OpenEvidence.
AS SEEN IN
Forbes: “OpenEvidence Keeps Doctors Up To Date On The Latest Science”
TESTIMONIALS
“I've been using OpenEvidence for the last week - it has been amazing! Able to narrow down on results quickly and find information that I wasn't able to do with Google/PubMed searches on my own.” - Dr. John Lee, MD. Physician & Faculty Member, Harvard Medical School
“OpenEvidence can be the foundational technology to power all clinical decision tools.” - Dr. Antonio Jorge Forte, MD. Director of MayoExpert, Mayo Clinic
“OpenEvidence is more up-to-date than UpToDate. And more useful regardless, since it’s interactive, and you can ask it questions, and get very specific answers about specific medical fact patterns in a patient case. It’s like having a curbside consult with a team of expert physicians, but that you can carry around with you in your pocket.” - Dr. Ram Dandillaya, MD. Clinical Chief, Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
“I am in community practice and medical director of a community cancer center. OpenEvidence has been an incredible lifeline for daily practitioners.” - C.J., Oncologist
“OpenEvidence is absolutely fantastic. I use it a gazillion times a day.” - J.A., Neurologist
“OpenEvidence’s efforts to make medicine more evidence-based are invaluable. The shift from judgment to calculation can reduce the level of noise currently found in medicine.” - Daniel Kahneman, Nobel Prize Laureate (In Memoriam)
“It is light years ahead of the next best medical oriented AI I have used.” - R.E.., Oncologist
STAY SHARP & UP-TO-DATE
• Find what you need, when you need it on a mobile-native platform.
• The world’s most powerful medical search engine at your fingertips.
• Discover and find exactly what you are looking for with deep search and a highly intuitive user interface that understands you and what you are asking.