Philips Health band
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 55 keywords for Philips Health band in Google Play
Philips Health band tracks 55 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 55 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 48.0.
Displays activity, cardio, and sleep metrics.
Tracked keywords
55
0 ranked • 55 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: upon
Avg difficulty
48.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.5
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 753
- 67.7
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 778
- 70.2
medical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 802
- 65.9
delivered
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 781
- 66.3
seconds
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 962
Unranked opportunities
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 753
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.2 • Competitors: 778
medical
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 802
delivered
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.7 • Competitors: 781
seconds
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.0 • Competitors: 962
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
real
Total apps: 74,834 • Major competitors: 11,689
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| health | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 23,713 competing apps Median installs: 25,526 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,845 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 72 | 81 52,389 competing apps Median installs: 37,519 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,390 major competitor apps |
| heart | 71 | 100 | 50 | 71 15,090 competing apps Median installs: 29,042 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,461 major competitor apps |
| medical | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 12,810 competing apps Median installs: 23,738 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 34,741 competing apps Median installs: 33,606 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,020 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 39,078 competing apps Median installs: 31,139 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,448 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| delivered | 72 | 100 | 49 | 66 7,157 competing apps Median installs: 26,645 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 781 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| patients | 71 | 100 | 39 | 60 3,336 competing apps Median installs: 19,052 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| seconds | 72 | 100 | 48 | 66 7,582 competing apps Median installs: 40,910 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 962 major competitor apps |
| patient | 71 | 100 | 38 | 61 3,718 competing apps Median installs: 18,204 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 8,881 competing apps Median installs: 28,496 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 753 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 64 | 83 74,834 competing apps Median installs: 53,568 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 11,689 major competitor apps |
| web | 71 | 100 | 61 | 72 16,914 competing apps Median installs: 27,890 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,758 major competitor apps |
| includes | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 33,489 competing apps Median installs: 30,818 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,100 major competitor apps |
| statistical | 70 | 100 | 33 | 53 1,215 competing apps Median installs: 23,310 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 75 major competitor apps |
| wake | 71 | 100 | 43 | 61 3,597 competing apps Median installs: 36,307 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 395 major competitor apps |
| real time | 72 | 100 | 60 | 69 11,090 competing apps Median installs: 26,316 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,131 major competitor apps |
| feedback | 70 | 100 | 61 | 75 24,640 competing apps Median installs: 34,787 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,404 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,589 major competitor apps |
| reported | 70 | 100 | 36 | 54 1,394 competing apps Median installs: 22,940 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
App Description
Displays activity, cardio, and sleep metrics.
The mobile app can be configured to enable data visibility for patient engagement or can be blinded for research purposes. Data is delivered to the Philips Actigraphy Server System (PASS) web application in real time (upon sync) for study team and/or clinician access and assessment. Data can be analyzed using aggregated statistical reports per participant or per study, 30 seconds epoch scored sleep/wake reports, 60 seconds epoch data list reports and participant scheduled and unprompted feedback reports.
