Philips Health band

Developer: Koninklijke Philips N.V.

Category: Health & Fitness

Add App to Comparison

4.2K installs

Ratings not yet available

124 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Monthly +14

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 55 keywords for Philips Health band in Google Play

Developer: Koninklijke Philips N.V. Category: health_and_fitness

Philips Health band tracks 55 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 55 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 43.7.

Displays activity, cardio, and sleep metrics.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 55 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.8

Top keyword: patients

Avg difficulty

43.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

patients

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 195
63.5
patient

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 202
64.8
wake

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 438
61.4
engagement

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 204
63.0
server

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 858
65.1

Unranked opportunities

patients

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 195
patient

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 202
wake

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 438
engagement

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 204
server

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Competitors: 858

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 383,308 • Major competitors: 17,750

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
access

Total apps: 340,622 • Major competitors: 12,539

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
mobile

Total apps: 281,665 • Major competitors: 11,158

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
using

Total apps: 221,317 • Major competitors: 12,105

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7
real

Total apps: 183,218 • Major competitors: 13,240

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
health	69	100	49	77 69,932 competing apps Median installs: 770 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,973 major competitor apps
device	68	100	60	80 108,544 competing apps Median installs: 3,347 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	6,821 major competitor apps
heart	71	100	47	74 42,816 competing apps Median installs: 1,011 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,616 major competitor apps
medical	71	100	44	72 34,074 competing apps Median installs: 1,240 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	909 major competitor apps
team	69	100	52	79 86,012 competing apps Median installs: 1,462 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4,231 major competitor apps
list	69	100	52	78 82,848 competing apps Median installs: 2,554 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	3,579 major competitor apps
using	66	100	57	85 221,317 competing apps Median installs: 2,899 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	12,105 major competitor apps
delivered	72	100	44	69 22,823 competing apps Median installs: 481 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	652 major competitor apps
time	64	100	58	89 383,308 competing apps Median installs: 1,497 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	17,750 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	56	87 281,665 competing apps Median installs: 1,458 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	11,158 major competitor apps
provide	67	100	52	82 136,537 competing apps Median installs: 1,648 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4,950 major competitor apps
access	65	100	59	88 340,622 competing apps Median installs: 1,166 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	12,539 major competitor apps
patients	74	100	39	63 9,669 competing apps Median installs: 749 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	195 major competitor apps
seconds	73	100	44	67 15,549 competing apps Median installs: 2,330 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	853 major competitor apps
patient	74	100	39	65 11,729 competing apps Median installs: 605 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	202 major competitor apps
upon	73	100	42	67 16,939 competing apps Median installs: 3,160 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	648 major competitor apps
real	66	100	57	84 183,218 competing apps Median installs: 2,374 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	13,240 major competitor apps
web	71	100	52	74 41,969 competing apps Median installs: 1,366 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,854 major competitor apps
includes	69	100	49	77 66,190 competing apps Median installs: 2,578 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,806 major competitor apps
statistical	73	100	34	55 2,884 competing apps Median installs: 1,894 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	75 major competitor apps
wake	74	100	41	61 7,186 competing apps Median installs: 3,971 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	438 major competitor apps
real time	70	100	51	74 46,142 competing apps Median installs: 884 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,141 major competitor apps
feedback	70	100	53	75 51,714 competing apps Median installs: 3,087 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,628 major competitor apps
data	66	100	57	84 182,594 competing apps Median installs: 1,338 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	7,201 major competitor apps
reported	73	100	35	55 2,874 competing apps Median installs: 2,188 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	89 major competitor apps

App Description

Displays activity, cardio, and sleep metrics.

The Philips Health band (PHB) mobile application displays Bluetooth data acquisition from the PHB wrist-worn wearable medical device. Data includes energy expenditure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and sleep metrics. Patients wearing the device may provide feedback through the application’s patient reported outcomes (PRO) feature.
The mobile app can be configured to enable data visibility for patient engagement or can be blinded for research purposes. Data is delivered to the Philips Actigraphy Server System (PASS) web application in real time (upon sync) for study team and/or clinician access and assessment. Data can be analyzed using aggregated statistical reports per participant or per study, 30 seconds epoch scored sleep/wake reports, 60 seconds epoch data list reports and participant scheduled and unprompted feedback reports.