Perined
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 72 keywords for Perined in Google Play
Perined tracks 72 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 72 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 41.9.
Perined shows the birth weight of newly born babies.
Tracked keywords
72
0 ranked • 72 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: innovation
Avg difficulty
41.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 61.5
innovation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 170
- 64.3
scientific
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 303
- 62.5
corresponding
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 331
- 65.8
improved
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 764
- 60.3
birth
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 277
Unranked opportunities
innovation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Competitors: 170
scientific
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 303
corresponding
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 331
improved
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Competitors: 764
birth
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 277
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 370,270 • Major competitors: 21,630
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
information
Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
without
Total apps: 212,452 • Major competitors: 10,465
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
data
Total apps: 180,122 • Major competitors: 6,588
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
based
Total apps: 152,689 • Major competitors: 5,418
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 60 | 89 370,270 competing apps Median installs: 2,549 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 21,630 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 55,904 competing apps Median installs: 1,282 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,569 major competitor apps |
| innovation | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 7,289 competing apps Median installs: 558 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,571 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 58 | 81 130,211 competing apps Median installs: 2,014 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,589 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 42,825 competing apps Median installs: 1,463 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,673 major competitor apps |
| life | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 113,797 competing apps Median installs: 2,100 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,060 major competitor apps |
| de | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 17,749 competing apps Median installs: 1,394 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 663 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 56 | 81 129,574 competing apps Median installs: 2,394 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 8,197 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 140,205 competing apps Median installs: 2,629 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,888 major competitor apps |
| group | 70 | 100 | 54 | 75 47,986 competing apps Median installs: 1,199 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,768 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,274 competing apps Median installs: 1,693 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,707 major competitor apps |
| without | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 212,452 competing apps Median installs: 2,784 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 10,465 major competitor apps |
| differentiated | 71 | 100 | 30 | 47 949 competing apps Median installs: 2,162 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 29 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 64,956 competing apps Median installs: 2,853 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,079 major competitor apps |
| weight | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,619 competing apps Median installs: 1,329 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 752 major competitor apps |
| important | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 116,727 competing apps Median installs: 1,165 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 3,904 major competitor apps |
| professional | 69 | 100 | 51 | 79 84,964 competing apps Median installs: 962 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 3,660 major competitor apps |
| show | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 65,325 competing apps Median installs: 4,908 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,226 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 180,122 competing apps Median installs: 1,181 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 6,588 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 152,689 competing apps Median installs: 1,248 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,418 major competitor apps |
| position | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 17,941 competing apps Median installs: 2,123 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 865 major competitor apps |
| research | 73 | 100 | 48 | 67 16,325 competing apps Median installs: 1,511 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 583 major competitor apps |
| developed | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 51,727 competing apps Median installs: 1,103 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,255 major competitor apps |
| scientific | 74 | 100 | 43 | 64 10,870 competing apps Median installs: 1,285 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 303 major competitor apps |
App Description
Perined shows the birth weight of newly born babies.
These curves are based on data from the perinatal registration of newborns in the Netherlands. The curves are normative and therefore developed based on a low-risk population without known risk factors for fetal growth restriction. All multiple pregnancies, inductions, and primary cesarean sections were also excluded to approximate the optimal birth weight for each gestational age. More information can be found at www.perined.nl and in the following scientific publications:
Hoftiezer L et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2019) From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts. 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.023
Hoftiezer L et al. Eur J Pediatr. (2016) Defining small-for-gestational-age: prescriptive versus descriptive birthweight standards. 10.1007/s00431-016-2740-8
The curves were compiled by Liset Hoftiezer, guided by a working group consisting of representatives from various professional groups, birth care organizations, and researchers:
Joyce Dijs-Elsinga, Jeroen van Dillen, Michel Hof, Marije Hogeveen, Chantal Hukkelhoven, Karline van de Kamp, Richard van Lingen, Alieke de Roon-Immerzeel, Rosalinde Snijders, Viki Verfaille, Ger de Winter, and Koos Zwinderman. The research position was financially supported by the Isala Innovation & Science Fund and Nutricia Early Life Nutrition; there has been no interference with the content of the project.
© 2024 Perined
