lexyvia
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 103 keywords for lexyvia in Google Play
lexyvia tracks 103 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 103 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 47.3.
Fill the gap! A sequence puzzle where one wrong choice ends the level.
Tracked keywords
103
0 ranked • 103 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: tests
Avg difficulty
47.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.7
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 733
- 68.5
steps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,066
- 63.9
lightweight
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 545
- 63.8
immediate
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 455
- 69.4
fill
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,609
Unranked opportunities
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Competitors: 733
steps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 1,066
lightweight
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.3 • Competitors: 545
immediate
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 455
fill
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Competitors: 1,609
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
like
Total apps: 150,415 • Major competitors: 21,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.5
help
Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
features
Total apps: 116,743 • Major competitors: 14,116
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| puzzle | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 28,003 competing apps Median installs: 41,023 Avg rating: 3.4 | — | — | 4,037 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,860 competing apps Median installs: 42,032 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,533 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 66 | 83 68,533 competing apps Median installs: 35,866 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,317 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 56 | 77 32,754 competing apps Median installs: 37,118 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,952 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 44,242 competing apps Median installs: 25,117 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,188 major competitor apps |
| make | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,922 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 31,345 competing apps Median installs: 35,708 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,571 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 52 | 72 16,253 competing apps Median installs: 32,717 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,542 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 16,094 competing apps Median installs: 32,556 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,779 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 66 | 87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,840 major competitor apps |
| smooth | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 30,186 competing apps Median installs: 46,589 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,070 major competitor apps |
| reading | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 26,120 competing apps Median installs: 28,202 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,913 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 24,961 competing apps Median installs: 32,987 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,750 major competitor apps |
| tests | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 10,438 competing apps Median installs: 21,778 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 733 major competitor apps |
| lightweight | 72 | 100 | 50 | 64 5,477 competing apps Median installs: 31,091 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 545 major competitor apps |
| stay | 68 | 100 | 67 | 81 51,579 competing apps Median installs: 26,352 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 5,332 major competitor apps |
| immediate | 72 | 100 | 42 | 64 5,437 competing apps Median installs: 26,421 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 455 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 73,791 competing apps Median installs: 37,773 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,679 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 106,353 competing apps Median installs: 32,331 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,187 major competitor apps |
| fill | 72 | 100 | 49 | 69 11,479 competing apps Median installs: 44,010 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,609 major competitor apps |
| current | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 37,523 competing apps Median installs: 28,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,434 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 25,324 competing apps Median installs: 37,985 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,782 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 68 | 88 150,415 competing apps Median installs: 46,503 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,531 major competitor apps |
| pure | 72 | 100 | 48 | 65 6,033 competing apps Median installs: 33,650 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 634 major competitor apps |
| without | 65 | 100 | 63 | 86 113,596 competing apps Median installs: 37,274 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 12,654 major competitor apps |
App Description
Fill the gap! A sequence puzzle where one wrong choice ends the level.
Gameplay is intentionally simple and focused. You’ll see number progressions, alphabet sequences, and straightforward mixed patterns. Examples include arithmetic steps like +1, +2, ×2, decreasing runs, A→B→C order, or repeating pairs. The current rule type is reflected in the level data, and subtle in-game cues help you stay oriented. When you tap a correct token, it fills the next empty slot; tap an incorrect one and you instantly fail, encouraging deliberate, confident choices.
Across thirty handcrafted levels, difficulty scales from gentle introductions to trickier multi-gap sequences with tighter token choices. Early stages teach the basics with obvious differences; later ones require closer reading of direction (increasing vs decreasing), step size, or alternating patterns. All levels are solvable without tricks or hidden rules.
Lexyvia features a polished neon theme, smooth feedback on correct taps, immediate shake-and-stop on mistakes, and lightweight progress tracking. A concise tutorial explains how to spot common rules, and an about screen clarifies the game’s “fill the gap” concept. There are no timers, lives, or distractions—just pure pattern-solving in short, satisfying sessions.
