HOJO
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 82 keywords for HOJO in Google Play
HOJO tracks 82 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 82 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.4, difficulty 48.8.
HOJO is an application for recording the growth of crops.
Tracked keywords
82
0 ranked • 82 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.4
Top keyword: field
Avg difficulty
48.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.7
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 677
- 68.1
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 737
- 69.9
changes
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,225
- 62.7
managed
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 385
- 64.8
accuracy
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 591
Unranked opportunities
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 737
changes
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 1,225
managed
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 385
accuracy
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 591
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
want
Total apps: 103,224 • Major competitors: 12,476
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
information
Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
create
Total apps: 93,845 • Major competitors: 13,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 69.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| changes | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 12,399 competing apps Median installs: 32,219 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,225 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,371 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 60 | 77 31,688 competing apps Median installs: 26,732 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,809 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 32,852 competing apps Median installs: 18,996 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,393 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| directly | 68 | 100 | 58 | 80 50,750 competing apps Median installs: 28,866 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,021 major competitor apps |
| take | 66 | 100 | 63 | 85 93,453 competing apps Median installs: 41,741 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,676 major competitor apps |
| track | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 58,055 competing apps Median installs: 25,840 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 5,673 major competitor apps |
| managed | 72 | 100 | 43 | 63 4,652 competing apps Median installs: 25,508 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 385 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 69 | 85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 13,574 major competitor apps |
| ai | 71 | 100 | 72 | 73 19,033 competing apps Median installs: 39,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,628 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 25,324 competing apps Median installs: 37,985 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,782 major competitor apps |
| want | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 103,224 competing apps Median installs: 39,982 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,476 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 61 | 81 52,752 competing apps Median installs: 28,708 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,048 major competitor apps |
| become | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 59,069 competing apps Median installs: 60,770 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,342 major competitor apps |
| crops | 70 | 100 | 45 | 53 1,193 competing apps Median installs: 82,995 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| output | 71 | 100 | 39 | 59 2,809 competing apps Median installs: 29,798 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 255 major competitor apps |
| location | 70 | 100 | 61 | 76 28,943 competing apps Median installs: 31,126 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,077 major competitor apps |
| accuracy | 72 | 100 | 44 | 65 6,215 competing apps Median installs: 31,033 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 591 major competitor apps |
| equipped | 72 | 100 | 44 | 65 5,966 competing apps Median installs: 33,766 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 605 major competitor apps |
| possible | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 23,344 competing apps Median installs: 31,057 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,330 major competitor apps |
App Description
HOJO is an application for recording the growth of crops.
Since images, date and time, and location information can be linked and managed, it can support the work of users who want to take growth profiles in large-scale fields and field workers who want to investigate differences between fields in various regions.
○ Growth record
・Let's record the growth of crops as an image. Since location information and date and time can be linked and managed, it is possible to track chronological changes in growth in specific fields.
・You can customize the measurement items according to your interests. Let's set it separately for the date type such as the date of sowing and the date of transplanting, and the numerical type such as the amount of fertilizer applied. You can skip entering each time by entering a default value.
○ Management in folders
・Sampling records can be managed by dividing them into folders. Create a folder for each fieldwork survey site, or for each experimental plot.
○ Data output
・The data saved in the folder can be output as a CSV file.
- More detailed analysis can be performed using the output CSC data.
○ Estimation of yield and biomass (rice only)
・Equipped with RiceScouter, which estimates rice yield and biomass only from images.
・RiceScouter is a technology that uses AI to estimate the yield or biomass of rice only from images. Use RiceScouter for yield to estimate the yield of the field before harvest, and RiceScouter for biomass to estimate the biomass during growth. Also, when using it, it is possible to estimate with high accuracy by shooting from 80 to 90 cm directly above the colony. (Accuracy may become unstable depending on shooting conditions.)